Paid Leave and Sick Leave: A Major Advance for Employees with Work Accidents
Droit-immobilier

Paid Leave and Sick Leave: A Major Advance for Employees with Work Accidents

📅 Décision du 13 September 2023⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation, in a ruling of 13 September 2023, grants the right to paid leave for employees on sick leave due to a work accident or occupational disease, even beyond one year. A decision that overturns French labour law and better protects employees.

Reference decision: cc • No. 22-17.638 • 2023-09-13

Imagine: you are an employee in a company in Beaupréau-en-Mauges. One day, a work accident forces you to take several years off. When you return, your employer tells you that you are only entitled to a few days of paid leave, because only the first 12 months of leave are considered as actual work. Unfair, isn't it? Yet that was the rule until recently.

The question is simple: can an employee on long-term sick leave continue to accumulate paid leave? The answer, long negative in France, has just undergone a spectacular reversal.

On 13 September 2023, the Court of Cassation, aligning with European law, ruled that periods of leave due to a work accident or occupational disease, regardless of their duration, must be taken into account for the calculation of paid leave. A decision that changes the game for thousands of employees.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr Dupont, a maintenance technician in Chemillé-en-Anjou, suffered a serious work accident in 2018. His employment contract was suspended for 18 months. On his return, he requested payment of the paid leave accrued during this period. His employer refused, citing Article L. 3141-5 of the Labour Code, which limits the consideration of leave for work accidents to one year.

Mr Dupont brought the case before the Angers Employment Tribunal, which partially ruled in his favour: only the first 12 months were taken into account. He appealed, but the Court of Appeal upheld the judgment. Dissatisfied, he appealed to the Court of Cassation.

The Court of Cassation, after consulting the Court of Justice of the European Union, ruled in his favour. It partially set aside Article L. 3141-5 and directly applied European law, guaranteeing the right to annual paid leave to every worker, without any limit on the duration of leave.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on European Directive 2003/88/EC, which requires Member States to guarantee all workers at least four weeks of annual paid leave. This Directive makes no distinction between employees who have worked and those who were on sick leave.

It also invokes Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which enshrines the right to paid leave. However, French law, by limiting the period of leave taken into account to one year, is contrary to these texts.

The judges consider that the employer, even a private individual, must respect this fundamental right. They therefore disapply the contested part of Article L. 3141-5 of the Labour Code and apply Articles L. 3141-3 and L. 3141-9, which provide for the right to leave for all employees.

This is a reversal of case law: previously, the Court of Cassation considered that French law was compliant with European law. Now, it admits that it is not, and imposes a compliant interpretation, even if it means setting aside national law.

What this means for you — practically

For employees on leave due to a work accident or occupational disease: you are now entitled to paid leave for the entire duration of your leave, even beyond one year. Example: in Beaupréau-en-Mauges, an employee off work for 2 years can claim 5 weeks of leave per year (i.e. 10 weeks in total).

For employers, this means an additional financial burden. You must provision for leave for employees on long-term leave. If you are a private employer (e.g. childminder), you are also affected.

For real estate professionals (managing agents, landlords), if you employ staff, this decision requires you to revise your leave calculations.

Note: this decision only concerns work accidents and occupational diseases. Ordinary sick leave remains subject to the 12-month rule (subject to future developments).

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check your payslips: ensure that your paid leave is correctly calculated during your leave for work accidents. If there is an error, claim arrears within 3 years.
  • For employers: update your payroll software to include leave of any duration. A provision for paid leave must be made from the start of the leave.
  • Keep all medical documents: sick leave certificates, unfitness notices, etc. They are essential to prove the duration of the leave and the link to the work accident.
  • In case of dispute, act quickly: the limitation period is 3 years from the date the leave becomes payable. Bring the case to the employment tribunal without delay.

Further reading: related case law and developments

As early as 2018, the CJEU had ruled (Case C-684/16) that the right to annual leave could not be conditional on a period of actual work. France resisted, but the Court of Cassation has finally given way.

A ruling of 8 November 2023 (No. 22-19.388) confirmed this position for ordinary sick leave, but with nuances. The trend is clear: European law prevails, and French limitations are falling one by one.

In the future, we can expect the Court of Cassation to extend this principle to non-occupational illnesses. Employers must prepare for full harmonisation.

In practice: what to do

FAQ: Your frequently asked questions

1. Can I claim leave for a period of leave before 2023? Yes, if the limitation period (3 years) has not expired. For example, for a leave in 2020, you can still act until 2023.

2. What if my employer refuses to pay my leave? Send a recorded delivery letter with acknowledgement of receipt, then bring the case to the employment tribunal.

3. Is the leave accrued during leave taxable? Yes, the paid leave indemnity is subject to income tax and social security contributions.

4. Can my employer dismiss me for claiming my rights? No, that would be discriminatory dismissal. You are protected.

5. Does this decision apply to civil servants? Yes, European law applies to all employers, public and private.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je réclamer des congés pour une période d'arrêt antérieure à 2023 ?

Oui, si la prescription (3 ans) n'est pas acquise. Par exemple, pour un arrêt en 2020, vous pouvez encore agir jusqu'en 2023.

Que faire si mon employeur refuse de payer mes congés ?

Envoyez une lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception, puis saisissez le conseil de prud'hommes.

Les congés acquis pendant l'arrêt sont-ils imposables ?

Oui, l'indemnité de congés payés est soumise à l'impôt sur le revenu et aux cotisations sociales.

Mon employeur peut-il me licencier pour avoir réclamé mes droits ?

Non, ce serait un licenciement discriminatoire. Vous êtes protégé.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle aux fonctionnaires ?

Oui, le droit européen s'impose à tous les employeurs, publics comme privés.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-17.638
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 13 septembre 2023

Mots-clés

congés payésarrêt maladieaccident du travailCour de cassationdroit européen

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Employee on leave due to a work accident for 2 years

Mr Martin, a forklift driver in Beaupréau-en-Mauges, has been on leave due to a work accident for 2 years. His employer has not paid him any paid leave indemnity during this period.

Application pratique:

Mr Martin can claim 10 weeks of paid leave (5 weeks per year). He should send a recorded delivery letter to his employer, then bring the case to the employment tribunal if refused. The limitation period runs from the end of his leave.

2

Private employer of a childminder on sick leave

Mrs Dubois, a resident of Chemillé-en-Anjou, employs a childminder. The childminder has been on sick leave due to an occupational disease for 18 months.

Application pratique:

Mrs Dubois must provision for the paid leave of her employee for the entire duration of the leave. She must declare these leave days on the social declaration of salary. In case of doubt, a consultation with a lawyer is recommended.

3

Managing agent of a condominium employing a caretaker on leave

A condominium managing agent in Angers employs a caretaker who suffered a work accident. The leave lasts 3 years.

Application pratique:

The managing agent must include in the condominium budget the paid leave indemnities for the entire period of leave. He must also update the payslips. An annual provision of 10% of the gross salary is recommended.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide