Aller au contenu principal
Apprenticeship contract in Alsace-Moselle: writing and registration are mandatory
Droit-immobilier

Apprenticeship contract in Alsace-Moselle: writing and registration are mandatory

📅 Décision du 18 November 1970⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that in Alsace-Moselle, the apprenticeship contract must be in writing and registered with the Chamber of Trades or Commerce to be valid and to qualify for the social flat-rate scheme. Decision of 18 November 1970, still applicable.

Reference decision: cc • No. 69-11.464 • 1970-11-18 • View the decision →

You are a craftsman in Plouhinec, you hire an apprentice for your joinery workshop. Everything goes well, the young person learns the trade, you contribute on a flat-rate basis. Then one day, the social security fund demands additional contributions: your contract was never registered, it is void. A situation still faced by many employers in Alsace-Moselle today, where local law imposes strict formalities.

This decision of the Court of Cassation of 18 November 1970 (No. 69-11.464) is a cornerstone of Alsatian-Moselle local law. It reminds that, according to Article 126 of the Local Professions Code (law of 26 July 1900), the apprenticeship contract must not only be in writing but also registered in the register of the Chamber of Trades or the Chamber of Commerce. Only under these conditions is it valid and enforceable against social security bodies, allowing the employer to contribute on the reduced flat-rate basis for apprentices.

What does this obligation mean in practice? And above all, how should it be applied today to avoid penalties? Analysis of a judgment which, although over 50 years old, remains highly relevant for employers in Bas-Rhin, Haut-Rhin and Moselle.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr X, owner of a car garage in Châteaulin (but the case takes place in Strasbourg), hires a mechanic apprentice in 1967. He drafts an apprenticeship contract on plain paper, has it signed by the apprentice and his parents, and registers it on 3 October 1967 in the apprentice register of the Strasbourg Chamber of Commerce and Industry. So far, everything seems in order.

But the Primary Health Insurance Fund of Strasbourg challenges the validity of the contract. It argues that the employer cannot benefit from the reduced social flat-rate for apprentices because the contract was not registered in the manner required by local law. The fund demands payment of contributions based on the actual salary, much higher than the flat rate.

The case goes to court. The first judge rules in favour of the employer, but the Colmar Court of Appeal overturns this decision. Mr X appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation, in a clear judgment, confirms the position of the Court of Appeal: the apprenticeship contract, to be valid and entitle to the flat rate, must imperatively be in writing and registered in the register of the Chamber of Trades or the Chamber of Commerce. Failing this, the employer must contribute on the actual salary.

The judges specify that the registration carried out by Mr X was late or irregular, but the decision does not provide further details. The essential point is that the sanction is clear: no flat rate without prior registration.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The judges' reasoning is based on a very specific legal basis: Article 126 of the Local Professions Code, derived from the law of 26 July 1900 still in force in Alsace-Moselle. This text provides that the apprenticeship contract must be in writing and registered in the register of the Chamber of Trades or the Chamber of Commerce. Only from the completion of these mandatory formalities is the contract valid and enforceable against social security bodies.

In other words, Alsatian-Moselle local law is more demanding than common French law. Elsewhere in France, the apprenticeship contract may be verbal (even if writing is strongly recommended). But in Alsace-Moselle, writing and registration are conditions of validity on pain of nullity. The Court of Cassation firmly reminds: without these formalities, the employer cannot benefit from the reduced social flat-rate for apprentices.

The judges reject the employer's argument that late registration would suffice. They consider the date of registration to be decisive: only registration before or at the time of conclusion of the contract entitles the flat rate. In this case, Mr X had registered the contract on 3 October 1967, but the date of conclusion of the contract is not specified. It appears that registration took place after the start of the apprenticeship, which is insufficient.

This decision confirms a consistent line of case law of the Court of Cassation on local law. It is neither a reversal nor an evolution, but a strict application of the text. The judges remind that local law derogates from common law and that the employer must comply scrupulously.

What this changes for you — concretely

For Alsatian-Moselle employers, this decision is a warning: every apprenticeship contract must be in writing and registered before the start of the training. Failing this, the employer risks a demand for additional contributions based on the actual salary, which can amount to several thousand euros per apprentice.

Let's take a numerical example: you hire an apprentice in Châteaulin (in Moselle) with a flat-rate salary of €800 per month. If the contract is not registered, the social security fund may demand contributions on an actual salary of €1,500, i.e. an additional cost of €200 to €300 per month. Over two years of apprenticeship, the back payment can reach €5,000 to €7,000, including penalties.

For apprentices and their families, the decision also has an impact: without a registered contract, the apprentice is not covered by social security for the apprenticeship, which can cause problems in the event of an accident at work or occupational illness. The employer bears liability.

If you are in this situation, you must check that your apprenticeship contract has been registered with the Chamber of Trades (for craftsmen) or the Chamber of Commerce (for traders). Registration must be done before the start of the apprenticeship, or at the latest within 15 days of concluding the contract (according to custom).

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Draft a proper written contract: Do not rely on a verbal agreement or a simple email exchange. Use the standard model provided by the Chamber of Trades or the Chamber of Commerce. Include names, dates, duration, hours, remuneration and place of work.
  • Register the contract before the start of the apprenticeship: Deposit the contract in the apprentice register of the competent chamber as soon as it is signed. Registration is free or almost free. Keep a receipt.
  • Check local deadlines: Some chambers require registration within 15 days of conclusion. Check with your chamber to avoid any delay.
  • Keep all supporting documents carefully: Signed contract, registration receipt, any amendments. In the event of an inspection, you will need to prove that you have complied with the formalities.

The Court of Cassation has handed down several judgments to the same effect, including:
- Cass. civ. 2e, 5 November 1969: same solution for an unregistered contract.
- Cass. soc., 14 January 1971: confirmation that registration is a condition of validity of the apprenticeship contract in Alsace-Moselle.

The trend of the courts is consistent: local law is interpreted strictly, with no possibility of retroactive regularisation. The judges consider registration to be a substantive formality, not a mere administrative formality. This means that even late registration, a few days after the start of the apprenticeship, can be penalised.

For the future, there is no indication of relaxation. Alsatian-Moselle local law is protected by the Treaty of Frankfurt and specific provisions. Employers must therefore incorporate this obligation into their recruitment process.

Summary and next steps

FAQ:

  • Can I hire an apprentice without a written contract in Alsace-Moselle? No, writing is mandatory on pain of nullity of the contract and loss of the social flat rate.
  • What if I already have an unregistered contract? Contact your Chamber of Trades or Commerce immediately to regularise. But beware, regularisation may not be retroactive.
  • What is the deadline for registering a contract? Ideally before the start of the apprenticeship. Some chambers tolerate 15 days, but it is better not to wait.
  • What are the penalties for failure to register? The employer must pay contributions on the actual salary, with increases and late payment penalties.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je embaucher un apprenti sans contrat écrit en Alsace-Moselle ?

Non, l'écrit est obligatoire à peine de nullité du contrat et de perte du forfait social. L'article 126 du Code local des professions l'exige.

Que faire si j'ai déjà un contrat non enregistré ?

Contactez immédiatement votre chambre des métiers ou de commerce pour régulariser. Mais attention, la régularisation peut ne pas être rétroactive.

Quel est le délai pour enregistrer un contrat d'apprentissage ?

Idéalement avant le début de l'apprentissage. Certaines chambres tolèrent 15 jours, mais mieux vaut ne pas attendre.

Quelles sont les sanctions en cas de défaut d'enregistrement ?

L'employeur doit payer les cotisations sur le salaire réel, avec des majorations et pénalités de retard.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle encore aujourd'hui ?

Oui, le droit local alsacien-mosellan est toujours en vigueur et la jurisprudence est constante.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 69-11.464
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 novembre 1970

Mots-clés

contrat d'apprentissageAlsace-Moselledroit localenregistrementforfait social

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Craftsman in Plouhinec hiring an apprentice

You are a joiner in Plouhinec, you hire an apprentice without a written contract. The fund demands €5,000 in back contributions.

Application pratique:

You must immediately draft a written contract and register it with the Chamber of Trades. Consult a lawyer specialising in local law to negotiate a payment schedule.

2

Trader in Châteaulin with a verbal contract

You run a business in Châteaulin, you have a verbal agreement with an apprentice. An URSSAF inspection detects the absence of a written contract.

Application pratique:

The contract is void. You must regularise as soon as possible and budget for the back contributions. A lawyer can help you contest the amount.

3

Apprentice in Strasbourg without a registered contract

You are an apprentice in Strasbourg, your employer has not registered the contract. You have an accident at work.

Application pratique:

You are not covered by social security. Contact a lawyer to take action against the employer and obtain compensation.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide