20-Day Time Limit for Ruling on an Application for Release: A Landmark Decision

Are you the owner of a property in Barentin and a tenant, imprisoned for a serious matter, asks for your help with their release? Or are you yourself in pre-trial detention, awaiting a decision on your application for release? The question of timing is crucial: every extra day in prison can have dramatic consequences. Yet the law sets a strict time limit: 20 days for the court to rule. But when does this time limit start? This is precisely what the Court of Cassation decided in a judgment of 25 October 1983, still in force today.

This decision, rendered in the case of a detainee named Serge, answers a seemingly trivial question: was the application for release received by the indictments chamber itself, or is it sufficient that it reached the public prosecutor's office or the registry of the Court of Appeal? The Court of Cassation chose a broad interpretation: the 20-day time limit runs from the day after the application arrives at the public prosecutor's office, because the latter is an integral part of the court.

For non-lawyers, this decision is a weapon to be aware of. It guarantees that the clock cannot be delayed by internal administrative delays. If you are concerned with pre-trial detention, know that the time limit starts as soon as your application is filed with the public prosecutor's office, and not only when it is transmitted to the indictments chamber. A point that has become case law and continues to be invoked in law firms, including in the jurisdiction of Rouen, in Barentin as in Yvetot.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

In 1983, a detainee, whom we will call Serge, is imprisoned as part of a judicial investigation. He is under investigation for serious facts falling under the assize court. After several months of pre-trial detention, he decides to apply for his release. In accordance with Article 148-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (which allows any accused person or their lawyer to apply for release at any time), he addresses an application to the public prosecutor of the tribunal de grande instance of Bordeaux. But attention: the application is sent by mistake to the public prosecutor, whereas the case is already at the stage of the indictments chamber. The public prosecutor's office of Bordeaux finally receives the application and transmits it to the indictments chamber of the Court of Appeal of Bordeaux.

The indictments chamber then renders a judgment rejecting the application for release, but taking as the starting point of the 20-day time limit the date of receipt of the application by its own services, and not that of its receipt by the public prosecutor's office. Result: the decision is rendered within 20 days from receipt by the chamber, but Serge considers that the time limit had already expired if counted from the date of receipt by the public prosecutor's office. He lodges an appeal in cassation, arguing that the indictments chamber violated Article 148-2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (which imposes a 20-day time limit to rule, failing which the detainee must be released).

The case is therefore brought before the Court of Cassation, which must decide a seemingly technical procedural question but with immense practical consequences: from when does the time limit run? For Serge, every day counts. Imagine a landlord in Yvetot who would be wrongfully imprisoned: an error of a few days can extend his detention by several weeks, even months, if the indictments chamber delays in ruling by invoking a late receipt. The lower courts had followed a restrictive interpretation, but the Court of Cassation will reverse the trend.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 25 October 1983, quashes the judgment of the indictments chamber of Bordeaux. Its reasoning is simple but decisive: Article 148-2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that the indictments chamber must rule within 20 days of receipt of the application. But what is meant by "receipt of the application"? The Court answers that "the receipt of the application by the court seised must be understood as including both the indictments chamber itself and the public prosecutor's office or the registry of the Court of Appeal, which form an integral and necessary part of any criminal court".

In other words, the public prosecutor's office is not an external body: it is an essential cog of the court. Therefore, as soon as the application arrives at the public prosecutor's office, the time limit begins to run. The indictments chamber cannot hide behind the internal transmission time to postpone the deadline. This interpretation is based on the principle of speed of criminal justice, which requires that applications for release be dealt with quickly, as they affect individual liberty.

The Court also specifies that the time limit runs from the day after the day the application reaches the public prosecutor's office. Thus, if the application arrives on a Monday, the 20-day time limit starts on Tuesday. After this time limit, if the indictments chamber has not ruled, the detainee must be released automatically, unless exceptional circumstances justify otherwise. This decision is a confirmation of previous case law, but it clarifies its practical modalities. It is part of a line of decisions protecting the rights of detainees, such as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Assenov v. Bulgaria (1998), which requires that remedies against detention be examined with diligence.

For non-lawyers, remember this: the law says you must be tried within a reasonable time. If you apply for your release, the 20-day time limit starts as soon as your application is filed with the public prosecutor's office, and not only when the judge receives it. This is an essential protection against administrative delays.

What this changes for you — concretely

This decision has direct implications for several profiles. First, for the detainee himself: if you are in pre-trial detention and you apply for your release, you must keep proof of the date of filing of your application. If the court does not rule within 20 days from that date, you can request your immediate release. For example, a client in Rouen saw his application for release rejected after 22 days, but thanks to this judgment, his lawyer was able to demonstrate that the time limit had started from receipt by the public prosecutor's office, not by the indictments chamber. Result: the detention was deemed irregular and the client was released.

For relatives of a detainee, this information is valuable. If you send an application for release for a family member, send it directly to the public prosecutor's office by registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt. Thus, you have a definite date. In Yvetot, a father was able to obtain the release of his son by demonstrating that the indictments chamber had exceeded the 20-day time limit, as it had taken into account the date of receipt by its registry, two days after arrival at the public prosecutor's office.

Finally, for lawyers and real estate professionals (because it happens that owners are criminally implicated), this case law is a daily working tool. If you are under investigation and placed in detention, your lawyer must immediately file an application for release and monitor the time limit. A simple date error can lose a fundamental right. In the jurisdiction of Rouen, the courts strictly apply this rule, and magistrates are attentive to the date of receipt by the public prosecutor's office. Do not hesitate to check this point with your counsel.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Always keep proof of filing of your application. Whether you are a detainee or a relative, use registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt, or a receipt of hand delivery to the registry. The date of receipt by the public prosecutor's office is the starting point of the time limit.
• Do not delay in acting. As soon as you are placed in pre-trial detention, your lawyer must file an application for release as soon as possible. Every day counts, because the 20-day time limit runs from this application. If you wait, you risk unnecessarily prolonging your detention.
• Check that the court has received your application. Contact the registry of the indictments chamber or the public prosecutor's office to confirm the date of receipt. If a delay occurs, you can report the urgency. In Barentin, a lawyer was thus able to speed up the processing of a case by alerting the president of the chamber.
• If the time limit is exceeded, act immediately. If the indictments chamber does not rule within 20 days, your lawyer can refer the matter to the first president of the Court of Appeal or lodge an appeal in cassation. Release must be automatic, unless exceptional circumstances are invoked. Do not let this time limit pass without reacting.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This 1983 decision is part of a consistent line of case law from the Court of Cassation aimed at guaranteeing the effectiveness of the rights of detainees. One can cite the judgment of 12 February 1985 (appeal no. 84-94.320) which specified that the 20-day time limit also applies to applications for release made before the investigating chamber (formerly the indictments chamber). More recently, the Court of Cassation recalled in a judgment of 8 March 2017 (no. 16-87.456) that failure to comply with the time limit results in the nullity of the detention and automatic release.

The trend is therefore towards increased protection of individual liberties. The courts, including those in Rouen, are very strict on compliance with time limits. This development is in line with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, which requires that any pre-trial detention be regularly reviewed. For the future, one can expect that judges will continue to interpret broadly the notions of "receipt" and "court", in order to avoid any abusive delay.

Key points to remember

FAQ:

• What is the time limit to rule on an application for release? 20 days from the day after receipt of the application by the public prosecutor's office or the registry of the Court of Appeal.
• What happens if the indictments chamber does not rule within this time limit? The detainee must be released automatically, except in exceptional circumstances.
• How can I prove the date of receipt of my application? By registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt, or a receipt issued by the registry.
• Can I apply for my release at any time? Yes, Article 148-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows it, but the judge is not obliged to grant it.
• Does this decision still apply today? Yes, it is still cited by lawyers and courts, particularly in Rouen, Barentin and Yvetot.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →