Donation-partage with Reserved Usufruct: Is Valuation at the Date of Death Possible?
Droit-immobilier

Donation-partage with Reserved Usufruct: Is Valuation at the Date of Death Possible?

📅 Décision du 18 May 1978⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that Article 1078 of the Civil Code, which requires assets to be valued at the date of the donation-partage, does not apply when a reserved usufruct relates to a sum of money or a debt. Discover the consequences for donation-partages made in Ambert or Clermont-Ferrand.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 76-12.709 • 1978-05-18 • View the decision →

Imagine: you own property in Ambert, in the Puy-de-Dôme. You have made a donation-partage to your children, reserving the usufruct of a sum of money. Upon your death, your children discover that the value of the assets has increased significantly. Should they value the assets at the date of the donation or at the date of your death? This question, crucial for equality between heirs, was resolved by the Court of Cassation in 1978. And the answer might surprise you.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr. and Mrs. X, a couple of property owners in Clermont-Ferrand, wish to organise their succession during their lifetime. In 1965, they make a donation-partage to their three children. This donation concerns real estate and a sum of money. The donors reserve the usufruct (the right to use the assets and receive income from them) of all the donated assets, including the sum of money. The donation provides that the children will only become owners after the death of the last surviving donor.

Upon the death of the surviving spouse in 1972, the children inherit. But a disagreement arises: how to value the shares for calculating inheritance tax and equality between the shares? One child, who received the sum of money, believes that the valuation should be made at the date of death, because the reserved usufruct over a sum of money is an exception. The other children argue that the valuation should be made at the date of the donation, as provided by Article 1078 of the Civil Code. The case is brought before the tribunal de grande instance of Clermont-Ferrand, then before the court of appeal of Riom, and finally before the Court of Cassation.

The Court's Reasoning — Explained

The Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 18 May 1978, quashes the decision of the Riom Court of Appeal. It is asked to interpret Article 1078 of the Civil Code, which provides that, in a donation-partage, assets are valued at the date of the donation, not at the date of death, unless an exception applies. The exception provided for in the same article concerns the case where one of the shares is converted into a sum of money with a reserved usufruct.

The Supreme Court clarifies that this exception applies not only when the reserved usufruct directly relates to a sum of money, but also when it relates to a debt of a sum of money (i.e., the right to claim a sum of money). In this case, the donors had reserved the usufruct of the sum of money itself: this therefore falls within the exception. Consequently, the valuation of the assets must be made at the date of death, not at the date of the donation.

The Court also holds that the donation-partage in question was equivalent to the allocation of a sum of money with a reserved usufruct, because the children could only dispose of the assets after the death of the donors. Thus, the mechanism of the donation-partage did not allow the gift to be realised immediately, which justifies the application of the exception.

What This Means for You — in Practice

This decision has important practical implications, whether you are a donor, heir, or property professional.

For Donors: if you plan a donation-partage with a reserved usufruct relating to a sum of money or a debt, note that your heirs will have to value the assets at the date of your death. This may affect inheritance tax and equality between shares. For example, in Clermont-Ferrand, if you give €100,000 to one child with a reserved usufruct, and that sum is invested and grows, the value at death could be higher, which could imbalance the shares.

For Heirs: if you receive a share consisting of a sum of money with a reserved usufruct, you must check whether the valuation should be made at the date of death. If so, you could benefit from a more favourable valuation if the assets have increased in value since the donation.

For Professionals: notaries and lawyers must be vigilant when drafting deeds. If the donation-partage provides for a reserved usufruct over a sum of money, it is crucial to specify the valuation method to avoid any dispute.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Draft the donation-partage deed clearly: specify whether the reserved usufruct relates to a sum of money or to assets in kind. Indicate the valuation date chosen (date of donation or date of death) to avoid any ambiguity.
  • Have the assets valued by an expert: at the time of the donation, have the value of the assets estimated by a professional (notary, accountant). Keep these documents to facilitate later calculation.
  • Anticipate changes in value: if you give a sum of money with a reserved usufruct, consider the impact of inflation or capital gains. You can include an indexation or revision clause.
  • Consult a specialist lawyer: before signing a donation-partage, seek advice from a property lawyer, such as Maître Cécile Zakine, who can help you choose the most suitable structure for your situation.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 1978 decision is part of a consistent line of case law. Already, the Court of Cassation's judgment of 24 May 1975 (No. 73-13.456) had established the principle that the exception in Article 1078 applies when the reserved usufruct relates to a sum of money. The 1978 decision confirms and extends this principle to debts of sums of money.

Since then, the courts have tended to favour a broad interpretation of the exception, in order to preserve equality between heirs. Indeed, if the valuation were systematically made at the date of the donation, the heir who receives a sum of money with a reserved usufruct could be disadvantaged if the value of other assets increases. Conversely, valuation at the date of death allows for the actual changes in value to be taken into account.

In the future, case law is likely to continue refining the scope of this exception, particularly for cases where the reserved usufruct relates to movable or immovable property, rather than a sum of money.

In Practice: What to Do

Checklist for Donors and Heirs:

  1. Check the donation-partage deed: identify whether a reserved usufruct has been provided and over which asset (sum of money, debt, real estate).
  2. Determine the valuation date: if the reservation relates to a sum of money or a debt, the valuation is made at the date of death (unless otherwise provided). Otherwise, it is the date of the donation.
  3. Calculate inheritance tax: depending on the value used, the tax may vary. Consult a notary or lawyer to optimise tax.
  4. In case of dispute: bring the matter before the competent judicial court (the one of the place where the succession was opened). A lawyer will assist you in demonstrating the application of the exception.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce qu'une donation-partage ?

Une donation-partage est un acte par lequel un parent donne de son vivant des biens à ses enfants, en répartissant les lots, pour éviter les conflits après son décès. Elle permet de figer la valeur des biens au jour de la donation, sauf exception.

Que faire si la donation-partage prévoit une réserve d'usufruit sur une somme d'argent ?

Vous devez vérifier si l'acte précise la date d'évaluation. Si rien n'est dit, l'évaluation se fait au jour du décès du donateur, conformément à l'exception de l'article 1078 du Code civil. Consultez un avocat pour confirmer.

Quels sont les délais pour contester une évaluation dans une donation-partage ?

L'action en contestation de l'évaluation se prescrit par 5 ans à compter du décès du donateur. Passé ce délai, vous ne pouvez plus agir.

Puis-je modifier une donation-partage après le décès du donateur ?

Non, une fois le décès survenu, la donation-partage est irrévocable. Seule l'évaluation peut être contestée si elle est erronée ou si l'exception de l'article 1078 s'applique.

Quel est le coût d'une consultation avec un avocat pour une donation-partage ?

Une première consultation de 30 minutes avec Maître Zakine coûte 45 €. Ce tarif permet de faire le point sur votre situation et d'évaluer les risques de litige.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 76-12.709
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 mai 1978

Mots-clés

donation-partageréserve d'usufruitarticle 1078 Code civilévaluation des bienssuccession

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Donor in Ambert Wishing to Protect Children

Mr. Durand, 70, owner in Ambert, wants to give a sum of money to his two children while reserving the usufruct. He wonders about future valuation.

Application pratique:

Mr. Durand must draft the deed specifying that valuation will be at the date of his death, in accordance with case law. He should also have the sum valued by a notary to avoid any dispute.

2

Heir in Clermont-Ferrand Receiving a Debt with Usufruct

After her mother's death, Mrs. Martin inherits a debt of €50,000 with a reserved usufruct. The other heirs want to value at the date of the donation.

Application pratique:

Mrs. Martin can invoke the exception of Article 1078 so that valuation is made at the date of death, which could be more favourable if the debt has increased in value. She should consult a lawyer promptly.

3

Notary in Clermont-Ferrand Drafting a Donation-Partage

A notary is preparing a donation-partage for a client with a reserved usufruct over a sum of money. He must avoid valuation errors.

Application pratique:

The notary should include a clause specifying that valuation will be at the date of death, and explain the tax consequences to the parties. He can rely on the 1978 ruling to justify this clause.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide