Droit Immobilier

By stating, on the one hand, that a

📅 Décision du 08 November 1994⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

By stating, on the one hand, that a company suffering from insufficient equity resorted excessively to bank borrowing and, on the other hand, that the facilities provided to it by the banks were not abnormal, the Court of Appeal, which, as regards the first of these statements, placed itself from the point of view of the structuring of the company's liabilities and its method of financing, and, as regards the second, from the point of view of the credit policy followed by the banks towards that company, merely made different assessments of realities and interests that were themselves different and, in so doing, did not contradict itself.

Reference decision: cc • N° 91-21.160 • 1994-11-08 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

By stating, on the one hand, that a company suffering from insufficient equity resorted excessively to bank borrowing and, on the other hand, that the facilities provided to it by the banks were not abnormal, the Court of Appeal, which, as regards the first of these statements, placed itself from the point of view of the structuring of the company's liabilities and its method of financing, and, as regards the second, from the point of view of the credit policy followed by the banks towards that company, merely made different assessments of realities and interests that were themselves different and, in so doing, did not contradict itself.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 91-21.160
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 08 novembre 1994

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide