Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

The decision is legally justified

📅 Décision du 17 June 1970⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The decision is legally justified which rejects the claim for termination of contract made by the quarry concessionaire for disturbances of quiet enjoyment caused by the landowner who operates an industrial facility nearby, even if this plant prevents the quarry from being worked to its extreme limits, and even if the coexistence of the two businesses made lawful administrative measures detrimental to the concessionaire inevitable, the landowner's obligation to ensure the concessionaire's peaceful enjoyment not implying that he must cease or slow down his own operation, which benefits from priority.

Reference decision: cc • No. 68-12.543 • 1970-06-17 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The decision is legally justified which rejects the claim for termination of contract made by the quarry concessionaire for disturbances of quiet enjoyment caused by the landowner who operates an industrial facility nearby, even if this plant prevents the quarry from being worked to its extreme limits, and even if the coexistence of the two businesses made lawful administrative measures detrimental to the concessionaire inevitable, the landowner's obligation to ensure the concessionaire's peaceful enjoyment not implying that he must cease or slow down his own operation, which benefits from priority.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, letters)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 68-12.543
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 17 juin 1970

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide