Holiday Pay Indemnity: Bonuses and Supplementary Hours Must Be Included
Droit-immobilier

Holiday Pay Indemnity: Bonuses and Supplementary Hours Must Be Included

📅 Décision du 13 September 2023⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 4 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that all remuneration paid in consideration of or in connection with work, including bonuses and allowances, must be taken into account in calculating holiday pay indemnity. A decision that secures employees' rights and impacts employers.

Reference Decision: cc • N° 22-10.529 • 2023-09-13

In Charleville-Mézières, an academic researcher wonders while filling in his tax return: should bonuses for marking exam papers and sitting on professional degree viva voce panels, received in addition to his basic salary, be taken into account to calculate his holiday pay indemnity? A question that arises for any employee receiving supplementary remuneration. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 13 September 2023, answers in the affirmative: any sum paid in consideration of or in connection with work must be included in the basis of calculation of the holiday pay indemnity. A decision that clarifies a often contentious point and protects employees' rights.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr X, a lecturer at the University of Reims, receives each year bonuses for marking exam papers and participating in viva voce panels for professional degrees. In 2018, he claims from his employer, the university, a back-payment of holiday pay indemnities for the periods 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, considering that these bonuses should have been integrated into the calculation. The university refuses, arguing that these payments are exceptional and not linked to his main activity. The dispute is brought before the employment tribunal, then the Reims Court of Appeal. The latter rules in favour of the employer in 2021, considering that the bonuses in question are not part of the normal remuneration and therefore should not be taken into account. Mr X appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation quashes the appeal judgment, ruling that the sums paid for marking exam papers and viva voce panels are indeed paid in consideration of or in connection with work, and must therefore be included in the basis of calculation of the holiday pay indemnity.

The Court's Reasoning — Analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 3141-22 of the Labour Code, which provides that the holiday pay indemnity is calculated on the employee's total remuneration. It clarifies that this remuneration includes all sums paid in consideration of or in connection with work, including bonuses and allowances, whatever their designation. In this case, the bonuses for marking exam papers and viva voce panels are paid for tasks performed within the scope of the employee's professional activity, even if they are occasional or distinct from his main duties. The Court of Appeal had excluded these sums on the ground that they were not part of the usual remuneration, but the High Court reminds that the criterion is not regularity, but the link with work. This decision confirms consistent case law: since a judgment of 26 January 2022 (n° 20-21.813), the Court of Cassation requires the inclusion of all work-related bonuses, such as target bonuses or 13th-month bonuses. The employer's arguments – exceptional nature, lack of direct link – are therefore dismissed.

What This Means for You — Practically

For employees receiving bonuses (seniority, year-end, profit-sharing, or supplementary hours), this decision means that their holiday pay indemnity must be calculated on the basis of their total remuneration, and not solely on the basic salary. Concretely, in Épernay, a salesperson receiving €2,000 fixed salary and €500 monthly bonuses will see their holiday pay indemnity calculated on €2,500, not €2,000. For an employer, the cost can be significant: they must check their payroll records and regularise any underpayments for the last three years (three-year limitation period). If you are an employee and you notice that your holiday pay indemnity does not include your bonuses, you can claim a back-payment. For employers, it is urgent to update your payroll software and employment contracts.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Check your payslips: ensure that the holiday pay indemnity mentions the total gross salary, including bonuses. If in doubt, ask for a breakdown from your employer.
  • Keep all evidence of bonuses: contracts, riders, payslips, bank statements. This will facilitate proof in case of a dispute.
  • For employers: update your payroll software to automatically include all bonuses in the calculation of holiday pay. Train your HR department on the latest case law.
  • In case of disagreement: send a recorded delivery letter to your employer requesting a back-payment, then refer the matter to the employment tribunal within 3 years of the end of the contract or the disputed payment.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This decision is part of a protective trend for employees' rights. Already, in a judgment of 26 January 2022 (n° 20-21.813), the Court of Cassation had ruled that the target bonus must be included. However, certain bonuses not linked to work (such as reimbursement of professional expenses) remain excluded. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has also reminded that the right to paid leave is a fundamental principle of European social law, reinforcing the obligation of an indemnity calculated on normal remuneration. In the future, one can expect judges to extend this rule to other types of variable remuneration, such as tips or commissions. Employers must therefore anticipate a broad interpretation of the notion of "total remuneration".

What You Must Absolutely Remember

FAQ:

  • Which bonuses are affected? All those paid in consideration of or in connection with work: seniority bonuses, 13th-month bonuses, target bonuses, profit-sharing bonuses, supplementary hours, etc. Sums not linked to work (reimbursement of expenses) are excluded.
  • Can I claim a back-payment for past years? Yes, within the three-year limitation period (3 years from the end of the contract or the disputed payment).
  • What if my employer refuses? Refer the matter to the employment tribunal. A consultation with a specialised lawyer can help you assess your rights.
  • Does this decision apply to civil servants? Yes, the principle is similar in the civil service, but the applicable texts differ.
  • How is the holiday pay indemnity calculated? The method most favourable to the employee is applied: either 1/10th of the total remuneration received during the reference period, or the maintenance of the basic salary. Your employer must apply the most advantageous rule.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quelles primes doivent être incluses dans le calcul de l'indemnité de congés payés ?

Toutes les sommes versées en contrepartie ou à l'occasion du travail : primes d'ancienneté, de 13e mois, d'objectif, heures complémentaires, etc. Les remboursements de frais professionnels sont exclus.

Puis-je réclamer un rappel d'indemnité de congés payés pour les années passées ?

Oui, dans la limite de la prescription triennale : vous avez 3 ans à compter de la fin du contrat ou du paiement litigieux pour agir.

Que faire si mon employeur refuse d'inclure mes primes dans le calcul ?

Adressez une lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception pour demander un rappel. En cas de refus, saisissez le conseil de prud'hommes. Un avocat peut vous assister.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle aux fonctionnaires ?

Oui, le principe est similaire, mais les textes applicables diffèrent (Code général de la fonction publique). Consultez un avocat spécialisé.

Comment est calculée l'indemnité de congé payé ?

Deux méthodes : 1/10e de la rémunération totale perçue pendant la période de référence, ou maintien du salaire de base. L'employeur doit appliquer la plus favorable au salarié.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-10.529
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 13 septembre 2023

Mots-clés

indemnité congés payésprimescalcul indemnitéCour de cassation 2023droit du travail

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Employee with target bonuses

A salesperson in Épernay receives a fixed salary of €2,000 and target bonuses of €500 per month. His employer calculates his holiday pay indemnity on the fixed salary only.

Application pratique:

The employee can claim a back-payment for the last 3 years. He must gather his payslips, calculate the difference (€500 x number of leave days), and send a written request to his employer. If refused, refer the matter to the employment tribunal.

2

Employer facing a back-payment claim

A small shop in Charleville-Mézières employs a salesperson with a monthly bonus of €200. The employer has never included this bonus in the calculation of holiday pay.

Application pratique:

The employer must immediately regularise for the future and check the limitation period. He can propose an amicable settlement to the employee for the sums owed. It is advisable to consult a lawyer to assess the risk and update payroll software.

3

Academic researcher with marking bonuses

A lecturer at the University of Reims receives annual bonuses for marking exam papers and viva voce panels. His employer excludes these bonuses from the calculation of holiday pay.

Application pratique:

Since the judgment of 13 September 2023, these bonuses must be included. The lecturer can claim a back-payment for 3 years. He must provide evidence of the bonuses and proof of the link with work. A lawyer specialised in employment law can assist him.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide