Aller au contenu principal
Eviction Compensation: The Limitation Period Only Begins After Recognition of the Right
Droit-immobilier

Eviction Compensation: The Limitation Period Only Begins After Recognition of the Right

📅 Décision du 23 March 2011⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 10 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the limitation period for the action for payment of occupation compensation due to the commercial tenant only begins to run from the moment the right to eviction compensation is definitively recognised, and not from the date of the notice to quit. A key decision for landlords and tenants.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 10-13.898 • 2011-03-23 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a commercial premises in Montauban, Place Nationale. You give notice to your tenant to take back the premises. The tenant contests it, and proceedings ensue that last for years. Eventually, the judge recognises his right to eviction compensation (the sum owed by the landlord to compensate for the loss of the business). But you also have to pay occupation compensation (the increased rent that the tenant owes you as long as he remains in the premises after the notice). From when does the limitation period to claim this occupation compensation begin?

The Court of Cassation answers this question in a judgment of 23 March 2011 (No. 10-13.898). It states that the limitation period for the action for payment of occupation compensation cannot begin to run before the day on which the tenant's right to eviction compensation is definitively recognised. In other words, as long as the landlord contests this right, the tenant is not required to claim occupation compensation on pain of forfeiture.

What few people know is that this rule protects the tenant against too rapid a limitation period, but it can also trap the landlord who neglects to have the right to eviction compensation recognised. Let us decipher this decision, its facts, its reasoning and its practical consequences.

The facts: a story like any other

Mr Dupont, owner of a commercial premises in Beaumont-de-Lomagne, gives notice to his tenant, the company Actua Immobilier, to sell the property. The tenant contests the notice and sues the landlord to have his right to eviction compensation recognised and to obtain payment. The proceedings follow their course: on 10 October 2002, the landlord files submissions by which he accepts the principle of eviction compensation. The tenant, for his part, then claims payment of occupation compensation for the period after the notice.

The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Montauban, and then the Court of Appeal of Toulouse, are seised. The central question: did the limitation period (at that time 5 years) to claim occupation compensation begin to run from the notice, or only from the day on which the landlord recognised the right to eviction compensation?

The lower courts considered that the period ran from the notice, and that the claim for occupation compensation was therefore time-barred. But the tenant appealed to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation quashed the appeal judgment: it considered that the period cannot run before the definitive recognition of the right to eviction compensation. In this case, the landlord recognised this right on 10 October 2002, and the claim for occupation compensation was made within 5 years, therefore admissible.

The reasoning of the court — deciphered

The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 145-28 of the Commercial Code (the text governing the eviction compensation of the commercial tenant) and Article 2224 of the Civil Code (which sets the limitation period at 5 years for personal or movable matters). It recalls that occupation compensation is the counterpart of the occupation of the premises after the notice, and is due as long as the tenant has not received his eviction compensation. But the starting point of the limitation period to claim this occupation compensation is not the date of the notice, because at that moment, the right to eviction compensation is not yet certain.

In short, the tenant cannot sue for payment of occupation compensation as long as he is not assured of obtaining eviction compensation. However, as long as the landlord contests this right, the tenant is uncertain. It is only when the right to eviction compensation is definitively recognised (by a final judgment, or by an agreement of the parties) that the tenant can claim occupation compensation. It is at that date that the limitation period begins.

Note however: the recognition of the right to eviction compensation may result from a simple acceptance by the landlord in his submissions, as in this case. But this recognition must be clear and unequivocal. undefined, I have come across files where the landlord accepted the principle but contested the amount, which is sufficient to start the limitation period.

This judgment confirms previous case law (Civ. 3e, 18 May 2005, No. 04-10.233) and extends it. It is a protective solution for the tenant, but imposes vigilance on the landlord: if he recognises the right to eviction compensation too early, he triggers the limitation period for occupation compensation to his detriment.

What this changes for you — practically

For the commercial tenant: You can claim occupation compensation for the entire period after the notice, even if several years have passed, as long as the right to eviction compensation has not been recognised. Example: in Beaumont-de-Lomagne, a tenant received notice in 2015, the landlord contested the right to compensation until 2020 (date of a judgment). He can claim occupation compensation from 2015 to 2020, without risk of limitation, provided he acts within 5 years of the definitive recognition.

For the landlord: Beware! If you recognise the right to eviction compensation in your submissions, you open a 5-year window for the tenant to claim occupation compensation. It is better to contest the principle to the end if you believe the tenant is not entitled to it. Otherwise, you risk having to pay occupation compensation for a long period.

For the purchaser of a premises: If you buy a premises with a sitting tenant, check whether a notice has been given and whether the right to eviction compensation has been recognised. You could inherit the obligation to pay occupation compensation.

For the co-owner: If the premises are in co-ownership, the syndic must be informed of any proceedings, as occupation compensation may affect charges.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Have your notice drafted by a solicitor specialising in commercial leases in Montauban or elsewhere. A poorly drafted notice can be contested and delay the recognition of the right to eviction compensation.
  • Negotiate an amicable agreement on the principle of eviction compensation as soon as possible. This sets a clear starting point for the limitation period of occupation compensation.
  • If you are a tenant, do not delay in acting: once the right to compensation is recognised, you have 5 years to claim occupation compensation. Do not let this period pass.
  • Keep all documents: notice, submissions, judgments. Proof of the date of recognition of the right to compensation is crucial.

The Court of Cassation had already held, in a judgment of 18 May 2005 (No. 04-10.233), that the limitation period for the action for payment of occupation compensation runs from the final decision recognising the right to eviction compensation. The 2011 judgment confirms and clarifies this solution. Since then, the trend of the courts has been consistent: the starting point is the date of definitive recognition, whether judicial or contractual.

What the future may bring: with the reform of limitation periods (Law of 17 June 2008), the period was reduced from 30 to 5 years. It is therefore essential to act quickly. The case law is now well established, but each case is particular. If the landlord contests the right to compensation up to appeal, the period only begins after the final judgment.

In practice: what to do

Checklist for the tenant wishing to claim occupation compensation:

  1. Check whether the notice has been given and whether the right to eviction compensation has been recognised (by judgment or agreement).
  2. Note the date of this recognition: it is the starting point of the 5-year period.
  3. Calculate the amount of occupation compensation due (usually equal to the rent, sometimes increased).
  4. Send a formal notice to the landlord, then sue him if necessary.
  5. Consult a lawyer solicitor to avoid any procedural errors.

In a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

À partir de quand court le délai pour réclamer l'indemnité d'occupation ?

Le délai de 5 ans commence à courir à la date où le droit à indemnité d'éviction est définitivement reconnu, soit par un jugement passé en force de chose jugée, soit par un accord des parties (par exemple, des conclusions acceptant le principe).

Que faire si le bailleur conteste le droit à indemnité d'éviction ?

Tant que le bailleur conteste, le délai de prescription de l'indemnité d'occupation ne court pas. Vous pouvez donc attendre la fin de la procédure pour réclamer l'indemnité d'occupation, mais attention à ne pas tarder après la reconnaissance définitive.

Quel est le montant de l'indemnité d'occupation ?

L'indemnité d'occupation est généralement égale au loyer contractuel, parfois majoré (par exemple 20 à 50 %). Le juge fixe le montant en fonction de la valeur locative des lieux.

Puis-je réclamer l'indemnité d'occupation pour toute la période après le congé ?

Oui, dès lors que le droit à indemnité d'éviction est reconnu, vous pouvez réclamer l'indemnité d'occupation pour toute la période postérieure au congé, sans limite de temps, tant que vous agissez dans les 5 ans suivant la reconnaissance.

Que risque le propriétaire qui ne paie pas l'indemnité d'occupation ?

Le locataire peut l'assigner en justice pour obtenir le paiement, avec intérêts et frais. En cas de résistance abusive, des dommages et intérêts peuvent s'ajouter.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 10-13.898
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 23 mars 2011

Mots-clés

indemnité d'évictionindemnité d'occupationbail commercialprescriptionCour de cassationdroit immobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Commercial tenant in Montauban: claiming occupation compensation after 4 years

A tenant received notice in 2018. The landlord contested the right to eviction compensation until 2022 (final judgment). The tenant claims occupation compensation for 2018-2022 in 2023: the claim is admissible because the period began in 2022.

Application pratique:

The tenant must prove the date of definitive recognition of the right to eviction compensation (judgment or agreement). He can then claim occupation compensation for the entire period of occupation after the notice, without limitation.

2

Landlord in Beaumont-de-Lomagne: avoiding paying excessive occupation compensation

A landlord recognises the right to eviction compensation in his submissions in 2020. The tenant waits until 2025 to claim occupation compensation from 2015 to 2025. The claim is time-barred for 2015-2020, but admissible for 2020-2025.

Application pratique:

The landlord must be aware that recognition of the right triggers the limitation period. To limit his risk, he can negotiate a global agreement including occupation compensation at the time of recognition.

3

Purchaser of a commercial premises in Montauban: checking occupation compensation debts

A purchaser buys a premises with a sitting tenant. The previous landlord had recognised the right to eviction compensation in 2019. In 2024, the tenant claims occupation compensation from the purchaser.

Application pratique:

The purchaser must, before purchase, ask the seller for a status report on the proceedings and require a guarantee on occupation compensation debts. A clause in the sale deed can protect him.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide