Aller au contenu principal
Eviction Compensation: Starting Point of Limitation Period Set by the Court of Cassation
Droit-immobilier

Eviction Compensation: Starting Point of Limitation Period Set by the Court of Cassation

📅 Décision du 10 December 1997⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 8 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled that the limitation period for an action for payment of occupation compensation runs from the date of the eviction compensation offer in the notice to quit, where the landlord does not dispute the tenant's right to such compensation. A key decision for commercial landlords and tenants.

Reference decision: cc • No. 96-13.373 • 1997-12-10 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of commercial premises in Pont-à-Mousson, and you give notice to your tenant, offering eviction compensation (the amount due to compensate them for losing their business). The tenant remains on the premises without paying occupation compensation (compensation for use of the premises after the lease ends). Years pass, and you suddenly claim arrears. But until when can you do so? This is the very question raised by this decision of the Court of Cassation of 10 December 1997.

In clear terms, the judges ruled: the starting point of the limitation period (the time after which legal action can no longer be brought) for an action for payment of occupation compensation is fixed at the effective date of the notice to quit, where the landlord has offered eviction compensation and has never disputed the tenant's right to benefit from it. In other words, if you acknowledge that your tenant is entitled to eviction compensation, you cannot wait years to claim occupation compensation. This decision, though technical, has immense practical consequences for commercial landlords and tenants.

But what exactly does it change for you, whether you are in Toul or elsewhere? Let us delve into the details.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr X, owner of commercial premises in Pont-à-Mousson, gives notice to his tenant, Mr Y, offering eviction compensation (the statutory compensation due to the evicted tenant for the loss of their business). The notice takes effect on a certain date, but Mr Y remains on the premises without paying occupation compensation (the amount due for use of the premises after the lease ends). For several years, Mr X claims nothing. Then, suddenly, he sues Mr Y for payment of occupation compensation for the entire period. Mr Y raises the limitation defence: according to him, the action is late because the period started running from the notice.

The tribunal, and then the court of appeal, rule in favour of Mr Y: they fix the starting point of the limitation period at the effective date of the notice, considering that Mr X, by offering eviction compensation, acknowledged Mr Y's right to such compensation and cannot now go back on it. Mr X appeals to the Court of Cassation, arguing that the offer of eviction compensation in the notice is only provisional (it can be revised) and that the limitation period cannot run until the right to compensation is definitively established.

The Court of Cassation dismisses his appeal. It holds that the court of appeal justified its decision by noting that Mr X had offered eviction compensation and had never subsequently disputed the tenant's right to benefit from it. Consequently, the starting point of the limitation period for the action for payment of occupation compensation is indeed the effective date of the notice. What few people know is that this decision rests on a simple logic: if the landlord acknowledges the right to eviction compensation, he cannot drag things out to claim occupation compensation several years later.

The reasoning of the court — explained

To understand, we must return to the legal framework. Articles 20 and 33 of the Decree of 30 September 1953 (now codified in the Commercial Code, notably Article L.145-28) govern the commercial tenant's right to eviction compensation. When the landlord gives notice without serious grounds, the tenant is entitled to eviction compensation, subject to exceptions. The landlord may offer this compensation in the notice, but such offer is provisional: it can be revised by the court.

In this case, the Court of Cassation (the highest French court) upheld the reasoning of the Nancy Court of Appeal. The trial judges had noted that Mr X (the landlord) had offered eviction compensation in the notice and had at no time subsequently disputed the tenant's right to such compensation. Consequently, the starting point of the limitation period for the action for payment of occupation compensation (which is due from the end of the lease) had to be fixed at the effective date of the notice.

This reasoning relies on Article 1240 of the Civil Code (extra-contractual liability) for occupation compensation, but also on the principle of estoppel (one cannot contradict oneself to the detriment of another) implicit in French law. In clear terms, if you acknowledge that your tenant is entitled to eviction compensation, you cannot wait years to claim occupation compensation without the limitation period running.

However, note: this decision does not mean that the limitation period systematically runs from the notice. It clarifies that this is the case when the landlord has offered eviction compensation and has not disputed the tenant's right. If the landlord disputes this right (for example, by refusing compensation), the starting point might be different. undefined, I have encountered cases where limitation was a real headache because the parties did not know when the period had started.

What this means for you — practically

For landlord owners: if you give notice to your commercial tenant offering eviction compensation, you must be vigilant. From the effective date of the notice, the limitation period for claiming occupation compensation begins to run. Generally, this period is 5 years (ordinary limitation period, Article 2224 of the Civil Code). If you wait too long, you risk losing your right to claim sometimes considerable sums. For example, in Toul, a 100 m² commercial premises can generate occupation compensation of €1,500 per month. Waiting 6 years potentially means €90,000 lost.

For tenants: if your landlord has offered you eviction compensation and you remain on the premises, know that the landlord cannot claim occupation compensation beyond 5 years after the effective date of the notice. This is an important protection. However, if the landlord disputes your right to compensation, the limitation period may be suspended or postponed. In this case, you should consult a lawyer promptly.

For buyers of commercial premises: if you buy a property with a sitting tenant, check whether notice has been given and whether eviction compensation has been offered. Limitation periods can affect the value of the property. A concrete example: in Pont-à-Mousson, a property with a limitation dispute may lose 20% of its value.

If you are in this situation, you must act quickly. Do not let years pass without claiming what is owed to you, or without asserting your rights. A simple registered letter can interrupt the limitation period (Article 2244 of the Civil Code). But be careful: a simple letter is not always enough; it requires legal action or a bailiff's act.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Tip 1: Act from the notice. As soon as you give notice to your tenant, clearly set the effective date and, if you offer eviction compensation, state that it is provisional. But above all, do not wait to claim occupation compensation. Send a formal notice by registered letter within weeks of the tenant's departure.
  • Tip 2: Record the absence of dispute. If you acknowledge the tenant's right to eviction compensation, formalise it in writing. This will avoid any ambiguity as to the starting point of the limitation period. Conversely, if you dispute that right, make it known immediately.
  • Tip 3: Monitor limitation periods. Note the effective date of the notice in your calendar and schedule legal action before the expiry of the 5-year period (or 2 years for certain leases). A simple oversight can be costly.
  • Tip 4: Consult a lawyer lawyer. Each case is unique. A lawyer will help you determine the exact starting point of the limitation period and the actions to take. In Nancy, for example, local case law must be known.

This 1997 decision is part of a consistent line of Court of Cassation decisions. We can cite the judgment of 3 April 1996 (No. 94-16.782) which had already fixed the starting point of the limitation period for occupation compensation at the date of the summons to determine eviction compensation, where the landlord disputes the right to compensation. The 1997 decision goes further in the absence of dispute.

More recently, the Court of Cassation has clarified that the limitation period for occupation compensation runs from each due date (for periodic payments) or from the event giving rise to the claim (for the global compensation). See for example the judgment of 15 September 2010 (No. 09-12.007). The trend is therefore towards protecting the tenant against late claims by the landlord.

For the future, case law may evolve towards a shorter limitation period (2 years) for occupation compensation, as is already the case for rent. But for now, the 5-year period remains the rule.

Key points to remember

  • When does the limitation period run? From the effective date of the notice, if the landlord offered eviction compensation and did not dispute it.
  • What is the time limit? 5 years (Article 2224 of the Civil Code) from that date.
  • What if the landlord disputes? The limitation period may be postponed to the date of the court decision fixing the eviction compensation.
  • How to interrupt the limitation period? By issuing a writ, a demand for payment, or an acknowledgment of debt.
  • Why is this important? To avoid losing significant sums (for example, €60,000 in unpaid occupation compensation in Toul).

You find yourself in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quand commence la prescription pour réclamer une indemnité d'occupation ?

La prescription (délai pour agir en justice) commence à la date d'effet du congé si le bailleur a offert une indemnité d'éviction dans le congé et n'a pas contesté le droit du locataire à cette indemnité.

Puis-je réclamer des indemnités d'occupation plusieurs années après le congé ?

Non, si le bailleur a reconnu le droit à indemnité d'éviction, l'action est prescrite (en général 5 ans) à compter de la date d'effet du congé. Passé ce délai, vous ne pouvez plus réclamer.

Quels sont les délais pour agir en justice pour une indemnité d'occupation ?

Le délai de prescription est de 5 ans (article 2224 du Code civil). Il court à compter de la date d'effet du congé si le droit à indemnité d'éviction est reconnu, sinon à compter de la fixation judiciaire de l'indemnité.

Que faire si mon bailleur ne m'a pas offert d'indemnité d'éviction ?

Dans ce cas, le point de départ de la prescription peut être différent. Il est conseillé de consulter un avocat pour déterminer la date exacte et éviter toute forclusion.

Comment interrompre la prescription ?

La prescription peut être interrompue par une assignation en justice, un commandement de payer, ou une reconnaissance de dette. Un simple courrier recommandé ne suffit pas toujours.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 96-13.373
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 10 décembre 1997

Mots-clés

indemnité d'évictionprescriptionbail commercialindemnité d'occupationCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner in Pont-à-Mousson facing a tenant who remained on the premises

Mr Martin, owner of commercial premises in Pont-à-Mousson, gave notice to his tenant in 2018 with an offer of eviction compensation. The tenant remained without paying occupation compensation. In 2024, Mr Martin wants to claim the 6 years of arrears, approximately €72,000.

Application pratique:

According to this decision, the limitation period started running in 2018. In 2024, sums prior to 2019 are time-barred. Mr Martin can only claim occupation compensation from 2019 onwards, i.e., approximately €48,000. He must act quickly to avoid losing the rest.

2

Tenant in Toul benefiting from an offer of eviction compensation

Ms Dubois, tenant of a shop in Toul, received notice with an offer of eviction compensation in 2019. She remained on the premises without paying occupation compensation. In 2024, the landlord claims 5 years of arrears.

Application pratique:

Thanks to this case law, Ms Dubois can raise the limitation defence for sums prior to 2019. The landlord can only claim occupation compensation from the date of notice (2019) and within the 5-year limit. She must check whether the landlord disputed her right to compensation, as this could change the starting point.

3

Buyer of commercial premises in Nancy with ongoing litigation

Mr Leroy buys commercial premises in Nancy in 2024. The former owner gave notice to the tenant in 2017 with an offer of eviction compensation but never claimed occupation compensation. The tenant is still in occupation.

Application pratique:

The buyer must be aware that limitation has almost run for occupation compensation prior to 2019. He can only claim sums from 2019 onwards. He must also check whether the right to eviction compensation was disputed, as this could postpone the limitation period. It is advisable to negotiate a reduction in the purchase price accordingly.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide