Eviction compensation: watch out for the 2-year limitation period from the notice
Droit-immobilier

Eviction compensation: watch out for the 2-year limitation period from the notice

📅 Décision du 12 February 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 4 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the 2-year limitation period for claiming eviction compensation runs from the effective date of the notice. A tenant who does not expressly join a request for an expert assessment does not benefit from the suspension of the limitation period.

Decision reference: cc • No. 24-18.382 • 2026-02-12

Imagine a shopkeeper in Porto-Vecchio who receives a notice from his landlord with an offer of eviction compensation. He thinks he has all the time in the world to negotiate the amount, or wait for the result of an expert assessment. Serious mistake: the Court of Cassation has just reminded that the time limit to claim payment of the compensation is two years from the effective date of the notice, and that a simple expert assessment requested by the landlord is not enough to interrupt the limitation period if the tenant does not expressly join it.

The facts: a story like many others

Yvette owns commercial premises in Ajaccio. She gives notice to her tenant, the company Vavintel, refusing renewal and offering to pay eviction compensation. The tenant does not leave and continues to pay an occupation fee. Yvette, wishing to have the amount of the eviction compensation assessed, applies to the interim relief judge on the basis of Article 145 of the Code of Civil Procedure (which allows a pre-trial investigative measure to be requested) to obtain a court-ordered expert assessment. The tenant does not oppose this request but makes no counterclaim. The expert is appointed. Later, Vavintel claims Yvette on the merits for payment of the eviction compensation. But Yvette raises the two-year limitation period under Article L. 145-60 of the Commercial Code. The court rules in Yvette's favour: the claim is time-barred because the two-year period ran from the effective date of the notice, and the tenant did not interrupt the limitation by expressly joining the request for an expert assessment. The Court of Appeal confirms. Vavintel appeals to the Court of Cassation.

The court's reasoning — broken down

The Court of Cassation, in its decision of 12 February 2026, dismisses the tenant's appeal. It recalls that, under Article L. 145-60 of the Commercial Code, the action for payment of eviction compensation is subject to a two-year limitation period running from the effective date of the notice. In other words, the tenant has two years from the day the notice takes effect (for example, the last day of the calendar quarter) to bring a claim for payment of the compensation. Next, the Court specifies that, to benefit from the suspensive effect of the limitation period attached to an investigative measure (such as an expert assessment), the tenant must expressly join the request for an expert assessment or present, even subsidiarily, a request to supplement or modify the expert's terms of reference. In short, if the landlord alone requests the expert assessment and the tenant remains passive, that expert assessment does not stop the limitation clock. In this case, Vavintel had not made a counterclaim nor asked the expert to assess the eviction compensation; it therefore remained inactive. Result: its claim was time-barred.

What this means for you — practically

For tenants: you must act within two years following the effective date of the notice. Do not rely on an expert assessment requested by the landlord to protect you: if you do not join the request (by making observations or requesting a supplementary mission), the limitation period continues to run. Concrete example: a notice effective on 1 January 2024 gives you until 1 January 2026 to sue the landlord for payment of the compensation. If the landlord requests an expert assessment in June 2024 but you remain passive, the deadline still expires on 1 January 2026.

For landlords: this decision is a defensive weapon. If you give notice, note the effective date carefully. If the tenant does not act within two years, you can raise the limitation defence. In Bonifacio, a landlord thus saved €80,000 in eviction compensation by raising the limitation period, because the tenant had waited too long.

For purchasers of commercial premises: check whether a notice has been given and whether the limitation period has expired. This can save you from buying a dispute.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Note the effective date of the notice upon receipt. It is the starting point of the limitation period. Enter it in your diary with a reminder 6 months before expiry.
  • Act without delay. As soon as the notice is received, consult a lawyer to start proceedings on the merits within two years. A claim on the merits interrupts the limitation period.
  • In case of an expert assessment, be active. If the landlord requests an expert assessment, make your own requests (for example, ask the expert to assess the eviction compensation). This way, you will be considered as having joined the measure and the limitation period will be suspended.
  • Document all exchanges. Keep letters, emails, and expert reports. They may serve to prove that you acted within the time limit.

Further reading: related case law and developments

In an earlier decision (Civ. 3e, 12 May 2021, No. 20-14.287), the Court of Cassation had already held that the starting point of the limitation period for an action for payment of eviction compensation is the effective date of the notice. The 2026 decision confirms this line but adds an important clarification on the suspensive effect of investigative measures. Previously, some tenants thought that any expert assessment interrupted the limitation period. Now it is clear that only active participation by the tenant in the request for an expert assessment can suspend the period. This position is part of a general trend to secure time limits in commercial law, to the detriment of parties who remain passive.

What you absolutely must remember

FAQ:

  • What is the time limit to claim eviction compensation? Two years from the effective date of the notice.
  • What should I do if the landlord requests an expert assessment? Expressly join the request, for example by requesting an extension of the expert's mission.
  • Can I wait for the expert assessment to finish before acting? No, if you are not active, the limitation period continues.
  • What happens if the time limit expires? You permanently lose the right to compensation.
  • Do I need a lawyer to act? Yes, because the procedural rules are complex and a simple mistake can be fatal.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quel est le délai pour demander l'indemnité d'éviction après un congé ?

Le délai est de 2 ans à compter de la date d'effet du congé (article L. 145-60 du Code de commerce). Passé ce délai, l'action est prescrite et le locataire perd tout droit à l'indemnité.

Que faire si le bailleur demande une expertise en référé ?

Le locataire doit s'associer expressément à la demande d'expertise, par exemple en formulant des observations ou en demandant à l'expert d'évaluer l'indemnité d'éviction. Sinon, la prescription continue de courir.

Puis-je attendre la fin de l'expertise pour assigner au fond ?

Non, sauf si vous vous êtes associé activement à la demande d'expertise. Dans ce cas, la prescription est suspendue jusqu'au dépôt du rapport. Mais il est plus prudent d'assigner au fond avant l'expiration du délai de 2 ans.

Le propriétaire peut-il opposer la prescription même s'il a proposé une indemnité ?

Oui, la proposition d'indemnité dans le congé n'interrompt pas la prescription. Seule une action en justice du locataire ou une reconnaissance de droit par le bailleur peut l'interrompre.

Quels sont les risques en cas de prescription ?

Le locataire perd définitivement son droit à l'indemnité d'éviction. Il peut être contraint de quitter les lieux sans aucune compensation, même s'il avait droit à une indemnité.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 24-18.382
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 12 février 2026

Mots-clés

indemnité d'évictionprescription biennalebail commercialcongéexpertiseeffet suspensifCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Commercial tenant in Porto-Vecchio: notice received in 2023

A tenant receives a notice with an offer of eviction compensation on 31 March 2023, effective 30 June 2023. He thinks the time limit runs from the notification of the notice and waits. In 2025, he sues the landlord, but the landlord raises the limitation defence.

Application pratique:

The effective date of the notice is 30 June 2023. The 2-year period expires on 30 June 2025. The tenant should have acted before that date. The expert assessment requested by the landlord in 2024 did not interrupt the limitation because the tenant did not make a counterclaim. The claim is inadmissible.

2

Landlord in Bonifacio: notice given in 2022

A landlord gives notice to his tenant on 31 December 2022, effective 31 March 2023. The tenant does not leave and pays an occupation fee. In 2025, he claims eviction compensation.

Application pratique:

The landlord can raise the two-year limitation period since the 2-year period from 31 March 2023 expired on 31 March 2025. The tenant did not interrupt the limitation. The landlord thus saves several tens of thousands of euros.

3

Purchaser of a commercial property in Ajaccio: preliminary check

An investor wishes to buy commercial premises in Ajaccio. The former landlord had given a notice with an offer of eviction compensation to the tenant in 2021, effective 31 March 2022.

Application pratique:

The purchaser must check whether the tenant acted within the 2-year period. If the tenant did not sue before 31 March 2024, his claim is time-barred. The purchaser will not have to pay eviction compensation. He can require the seller to provide a warranty against this risk.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide