Aller au contenu principal
Public Holiday and Day of Rest: When a Company Agreement Grants You an Additional Day Off
Droit-immobilier

Public Holiday and Day of Rest: When a Company Agreement Grants You an Additional Day Off

📅 Décision du 06 October 2010⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled: according to the 1989 Conforama agreement, an employee whose day of rest coincides with a public holiday is entitled to an additional day off, even if that day falls during their holiday. The employer cannot limit this benefit to weekly rest only.

Reference Decision: cc • N° 09-16.435 • 2010-10-06 • View decision →

Imagine: you are an employee at Conforama in Soustons, and your day of rest falls on a Monday. That Monday is a public holiday. You think you lose that public holiday because you do not work that day. But does your employer grant you an additional day off? The question is divisive. This is exactly the dispute that the Court of Cassation had to resolve in 2010.

Every owner or tenant may feel concerned: after all, employees' rights affect their purchasing power, and therefore their ability to pay rent or maintain property. But beyond that, this judgment illustrates a fundamental principle: a company agreement must be applied literally, without adding conditions that are not in it.

The decision of 6 October 2010 (n° 09-16.435) recalls that Article 28(i) of the Conforama agreement of 15 January 1989 is clear: "employees whose day of rest coincides with a public holiday will benefit from an additional day off." The Court of Cassation censures the Court of Appeal which had added the word "weekly" to the text, thus limiting the benefit. Let us see what this means in practice.

The Facts: A Story Like Those That Happen Every Day

Mr X, an employee of the Conforama store in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, had his day of rest set to Wednesday. On a Wednesday that was a public holiday, he noted that his employer did not grant him an additional day off. He took legal action. His argument: the company agreement provides that any day of rest coinciding with a public holiday entitles an additional day off. The employer retorts that the day of rest referred to is the mandatory weekly rest (Sunday), not a mere contractual rest day. But the text does not specify "weekly".

The dispute went up to the Court of Appeal, which ruled in favour of the employer. According to it, the day of rest must be understood as weekly rest, because the law imposes 24 consecutive hours of rest per week. Mr X appealed to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation quashed the judgment: by adding the word "weekly", the Court of Appeal violated the company agreement. It does not matter whether the day of rest is Sunday or another day, it does not matter if the employee is on holiday that day: as soon as the rest coincides with a public holiday, an additional day off is due.

What to remember: the contractual text does not distinguish according to the nature of the rest. It is therefore applicable to all employees covered by the agreement, regardless of their day of rest.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on Article 28(i) of the Conforama company agreement. This text, clear and precise, stipulates that "employees whose day of rest coincides with a public holiday will benefit from an additional day off." No mention of "weekly rest" appears there. The Court of Appeal had nevertheless interpreted the text in this sense, considering that the legislator referred to weekly rest (24 consecutive hours, usually Sunday). But the Court of Cassation recalls that it is prohibited to add a condition to the contractual text that it does not contain. In other words, the judge cannot rewrite the agreement.

The reasoning is simple: if the parties to the agreement had wanted to limit the benefit to weekly rest only, they would have specified it. In the absence of such specification, the text applies to all days of rest, whether weekly, contractual or otherwise. The decision also confirms that the public holiday can be included in a period of the employee's holiday: even if the employee is on holiday, the day of rest that falls on a public holiday gives entitlement to the additional day. In short, the employer cannot argue that the employee was already on holiday to refuse the benefit.

This decision is neither a reversal nor an evolution: it is a literal application of the text. But it has value as a principle for all similar company agreements. However, caution: it does not create a general right to an additional day for any public holiday coinciding with a rest. It only applies to employees subject to this specific agreement. But it gives an indication: judges are attached to the letter of agreements.

What This Changes for You — Practically

If you are an employee at Conforama (or in a company with an identical agreement), you must check your schedule. Whenever your usual day of rest falls on a public holiday, you are entitled to an additional day off. Even if you are on holiday that day. For example, if your rest day is Monday and Easter Monday is a public holiday, you get a day off to be taken later.

For employers, this decision implies an obligation of precise accounting. An employer in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax who manages 50 employees must identify all cases and grant the additional day. Failing this, they risk back pay and damages. undefined, I have encountered cases where the employer systematically refused these days, thinking that only Sundays counted. Result: years of unallocated days, amounting to several thousand euros per employee.

For landlord owners, this decision may impact the calculation of service charges if your tenant is an employee and their income fluctuates with additional days. But above all, it illustrates the importance of reading contracts and agreements literally. Similarly, a property buyer must check the easements in the deed of sale: a missing word can change the scope of a clause.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Read your company agreement or collective bargaining agreement. Do not rely on your employer's practice. The text is authoritative. Ask your HR department for a copy.
  • Record in writing each public holiday coinciding with your rest day. Keep a simple table: date, rest day, public holiday, and whether the additional day was granted or not. In case of dispute, you will have evidence.
  • Do not hesitate to ask your employer. A written request (email) is better than silence. If the employer refuses, ask on what basis. They must justify their refusal.
  • Consult a lawyer as soon as the first refusal occurs. Do not let months of uncollected rights accumulate. A formal notice may be enough to resolve the situation.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This decision is part of a series of judgments where the Court of Cassation recalls that collective agreements and company agreements must be interpreted strictly, without adding conditions not provided for. For example, a judgment of 3 November 2005 (n° 04-10.405) had already censured a Court of Appeal that had added a condition of "principal residence" to a contractual text. The trend is clear: the judge cannot modify the balance negotiated by the social partners.

Conversely, some decisions have allowed a teleological interpretation (according to the spirit of the text) when the letter was ambiguous. But here, the text was clear. For the future, companies must be vigilant when drafting their agreements: if they want to limit a benefit to weekly rest only, they must write it in black and white.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim an additional day off if my day of rest is Sunday and it is a public holiday? Yes, if your company agreement provides for it. The Conforama judgment does not distinguish Sunday from other days.

What if my employer refuses to grant me this additional day? Gather evidence (schedules, emails, text of the agreement) and send them a formal notice by registered letter. If the refusal persists, take the case to the industrial tribunal.

Does this decision apply to all employees? No, only to those covered by the Conforama agreement of 15 January 1989. However, other agreements may contain similar clauses. Check your own collective agreement.

What is the time limit to claim these additional days? The limitation period for legal action is 2 years from the day you became aware of your right (Article L.1471-1 of the Labour Code). Do not delay.

Can I combine this additional day with other days off? Yes, the agreement does not provide for any exclusion. The additional day is added to your paid leave, RTT or others.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) may save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je prétendre à un jour de congé supplémentaire si mon jour de repos est le dimanche et qu'il est férié ?

Oui, si votre accord d'entreprise le prévoit. L'arrêt Conforama ne distingue pas le dimanche des autres jours. Le texte parle de "jour de repos" sans précision, donc tout jour de repos contractuel est concerné.

Que faire si mon employeur refuse de m'accorder ce jour supplémentaire ?

Rassemblez les preuves (plannings, emails, texte de l'accord) et adressez-lui une mise en demeure par lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception. Si le refus persiste, saisissez le conseil de prud'hommes dans un délai de 2 ans.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle à tous les salariés ?

Non, uniquement à ceux couverts par l'accord Conforama du 15 janvier 1989. Cependant, d'autres accords d'entreprise ou conventions collectives peuvent contenir des clauses similaires. Vérifiez votre propre convention collective.

Quel est le délai pour réclamer ces jours supplémentaires ?

L'action en justice se prescrit par 2 ans à compter du jour où vous avez eu connaissance de votre droit (article L.1471-1 du Code du travail). Ne tardez pas à agir.

Puis-je cumuler ce jour supplémentaire avec d'autres jours de congé ?

Oui, l'accord ne prévoit aucune exclusion. Le jour supplémentaire s'ajoute à vos congés payés, RTT ou autres jours de repos. Il peut être pris à une date ultérieure, selon les modalités prévues par l'employeur.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 09-16.435
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 06 octobre 2010

Mots-clés

jour fériérepos hebdomadairecongé supplémentaireaccord d'entrepriseConforamaCour de cassationdroit du travailsalarié

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Conforama Employee in Soustons: Rest Day on Monday, Public Holiday Falls During Holidays

Mr Dupont, an employee in Soustons, has his rest day on Monday. Easter Monday is a public holiday, but he was on holiday that week. His employer refuses the additional day, arguing that the public holiday falls during his holiday.

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation ruled that the public holiday can be included in a holiday period. Mr Dupont is entitled to an additional day off, even if he was on holiday. He must claim this day in writing, and if refused, take the case to the industrial tribunal.

2

Employer in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax: Schedule Management and Risk of Litigation

A company in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, not subject to the Conforama agreement but with a similar clause in its collective agreement, must manage public holidays coinciding with employees' rest days.

Application pratique:

The employer must identify all cases and grant the additional day. Failing this, they risk back pay and damages. They may implement an automated tracking tool to avoid errors.

3

Landlord Owner: Indirect Impact of Additional Days on Tenant's Income

An owner in Mont-de-Marsan rents an apartment to a Conforama employee. The tenant obtains several additional days off per year, which increases their income (paid holiday allowance).

Application pratique:

The owner has no direct action, but must know that the tenant's financial situation may improve. This may be an argument in case of a request for rent revision or guarantee.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide