Paid Leave and Public Holidays: When Counting in Working Days Changes Everything
Droit-immobilier

Paid Leave and Public Holidays: When Counting in Working Days Changes Everything

📅 Décision du 21 March 1997⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 4 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that when an employee's leave is calculated in working days, a public holiday falling on a non-working day in the company does not have to be compensated. This 1997 decision remains relevant for employers and employees.

Reference decision: cc • No. 92-44.778 • 1997-03-21 • View the decision →

Imagine: you own a small building in Limoges and employ a caretaker. He takes his leave from 22 December to 5 January, a period including Christmas and New Year's Day. Upon his return, he claims an extra day off because Christmas fell on a Sunday, which is usually a non-working day in your company. You argue that his leave is counted in working days and that this public holiday does not entitle him to compensation. Who is right?

This is exactly the question the Court of Cassation had to decide in this 1997 case, opposing an employee of the Caisse Régionale d'Assurance Maladie du Sud-Est to his employer. The employee had taken leave from 22 December 1982 to 5 January 1983, and considered that the public holiday on 1 January (falling on a Saturday, a non-working day in the company) should be 'given back' to him in the form of an extra day of leave.

The judges' answer was clear: when leave is calculated in working days (i.e., the days actually worked in the company), a public holiday falling on a non-working day has no impact on the count. No extension, no extra day. A decision that, nearly thirty years later, continues to govern relations between employers and employees.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr. X, an employee of the Caisse Régionale d'Assurance Maladie du Sud-Est in Brive-la-Gaillarde, had more than one year's seniority. As every year, he submitted an annual leave request for the period from 22 December 1982 to 5 January 1983. Nothing exceptional: many employees choose this period to enjoy the holidays.

Except that 1 January 1983 fell on a Saturday. In this office, Saturday was a non-working day (only Monday to Friday were worked). Mr. X considered that this public holiday, although usually not worked, should be compensated by an extra day of leave, in accordance with a protocol agreement of 26 April 1973 which provided for exceptional leave for legal holidays falling on a working day usually not worked.

The employer refused. According to him, since Mr. X's leave was counted in working days (and not in business days), the fact that 1 January was a non-working Saturday did not entitle him to anything. The employee then referred the matter to the industrial tribunal, then the court of appeal, which ruled in his favour. But the employer appealed to the Court of Cassation. And the Court of Cassation quashed the appeal judgment, remanding the case to another court.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Court of Cassation relied on two texts: Article L. 223-2 of the Labour Code (now L. 3141-3) which defines the concept of business day, and the protocol agreement of 26 April 1973 specific to the Social Security system.

The reasoning is subtle. First, the Court recalls that when leave is counted in business days (Monday to Saturday, except Sunday and public holidays), a public holiday falling on a business day must be extended by one day. This is logical: the employee should not lose a day of leave because a public holiday falls during his holiday.

But in this case, the count was in working days, i.e., the days actually worked in the company (usually Monday to Friday). In this case, a public holiday falling on a non-working day (like Saturday) is not a lost day of leave since the employee would not have worked that day anyway. So no compensation.

The Court further specifies that the protocol agreement provided that the exceptional leave for a legal holiday should be taken on the nearest working day. However, Mr. X was on leave those days, so he could not benefit from it. The decision is logical: one cannot cumulate two advantages for the same fact.

What this means for you — concretely

For employers (landlords employing a caretaker, co-ownership managers with staff, etc.): if you count your employees' leave in working days, you do not have to grant an extra day when a public holiday falls on a non-working day in your company. For example, if your company is closed on Saturday and 1 January falls on a Saturday, an employee on leave that week cannot claim an extra day. Potential saving: one day's salary per concerned employee, which, for a small co-ownership in Limoges employing a caretaker, represents about €150 per year.

For employees: be careful to check how your employer counts your leave. If it is in working days, you will gain nothing if a public holiday falls on a non-working day. On the other hand, if the count is in business days (rarer today), you are entitled to an extension when the public holiday coincides with a business day, even if that day is usually not worked in the company.

For property professionals (property managers, syndics): when drawing up employment contracts for caretakers or concierges, always specify the method of counting leave in the contract. An omission can lead to disputes, as in this case which lasted several years.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Specify the counting method in the employment contract: explicitly state whether leave is calculated in business days (Monday to Saturday) or in working days (days actually worked). In Brive-la-Gaillarde as elsewhere, a well-drafted contract avoids 90% of conflicts.
  • Inform your employee in writing before each leave period: a simple letter or an addendum to the contract reminding the rules applicable to public holidays can prevent any challenge. Keep a signed copy.
  • Use an up-to-date payroll software: modern tools automatically incorporate the rules of the Court of Cassation. Check that your software distinguishes between business days and working days.
  • If in doubt, consult a lawyer specialised in labour law: the rules are complex and vary according to collective agreements. A 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you from a conviction at the industrial tribunal.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This 1997 decision is part of a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. As early as 1995, in a judgment of 10 May (No. 93-42.187), the Court ruled that for employees on a fixed-day scheme, a public holiday falling on a non-working day did not give right to recovery. In 2004, it extended this reasoning to RTT days (judgment of 23 June 2004, No. 02-40.927).

The trend is therefore clear: the judges favour a strict interpretation of the texts, to the detriment of employees' claims. No reversal is to be expected, as the law itself now clearly distinguishes the two counting methods (Articles L. 3141-3 et seq. of the Labour Code).

For the future, employers must be vigilant: some collective agreements may provide for more favourable rules for employees. For example, the collective agreement for the real estate sector (IDCC 1527) provides that public holidays are days off and paid, even if they fall on a non-working day. Always check the applicable collective agreement.

What you absolutely need to remember

FAQ: 5 essential questions

  1. My employee takes leave from 24 December to 2 January. Christmas Day falls on a Wednesday (working day). Do I have to extend his leave by one day? No, because Christmas Day is a working day: it is included in his leave. The employee benefits from 10 days of leave (24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 1, 2 January), without an extra public holiday to make up.
  2. What if 1 January falls on a Saturday (non-working day in my company)? Nothing to do either. The employee has not lost a day of leave since Saturday is not a working day. His count remains unchanged.
  3. Can I change the counting method during the contract? Yes, but only with the employee's agreement, formalised by an addendum. An unilateral change would be considered a modification of the employment contract.
  4. What if my employee still claims an extra day? Explain the rule to him based on this Court of Cassation decision. If he persists, suggest he consult a lawyer or the labour inspection services.
  5. Does this rule apply to public holidays like 1 May? Yes, 1 May is a paid public holiday. But if it falls on a non-working day, it does not give right to recovery, unless your collective agreement provides otherwise.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je récupérer un jour férié tombant un samedi si mes congés sont en jours ouvrés ?

Non, selon la Cour de cassation, si vos congés sont décomptés en jours ouvrés (jours effectivement travaillés), un jour férié qui tombe un jour non ouvré (comme le samedi) n'ouvre droit à aucun jour supplémentaire. Vous ne perdez pas de jour de congé puisque vous n'auriez pas travaillé ce jour-là.

Que faire si mon employeur refuse de me donner un jour de congé pour un jour férié tombé pendant mes vacances ?

Vérifiez d'abord le mode de décompte de vos congés dans votre contrat de travail ou la convention collective. Si le décompte est en jours ouvrables (du lundi au samedi), vous avez droit à une prolongation. Si en jours ouvrés, l'employeur a raison. En cas de doute, consultez un avocat en droit du travail.

Quels sont les délais pour contester un refus de compensation d'un jour férié ?

Le délai de prescription est de 3 ans à compter du jour où vous avez eu connaissance du refus (article L. 3245-1 du Code du travail). Pour un refus survenu en 2024, vous avez jusqu'en 2027 pour agir. Mais il est conseillé de réagir rapidement pour éviter des difficultés de preuve.

Mon employeur peut-il changer le mode de décompte des congés sans mon accord ?

Non, le mode de décompte (jours ouvrables ou ouvrés) est une clause du contrat de travail. Toute modification nécessite votre accord écrit, formalisé par un avenant. Un changement unilatéral est illégal et peut être contesté devant le conseil de prud'hommes.

Cette règle s'applique-t-elle aux jours fériés chômés comme le 1er mai ?

Oui, le même principe s'applique. Le 1er mai est un jour férié légal chômé et payé. S'il tombe un jour non ouvré (dimanche ou samedi selon l'entreprise), il n'y a pas de compensation. Toutefois, certaines conventions collectives peuvent prévoir des dispositions plus favorables.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 92-44.778
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 21 mars 1997

Mots-clés

congés payésjours fériésdécompte jours ouvrésCour de cassationdroit du travailemployeursalariéLimoges

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord employing a caretaker in Limoges

Mr. Dupont, owner of a 6-unit building in Limoges, employs a part-time caretaker. Leave is counted in working days. The caretaker takes leave from 24 December to 2 January 2024. Christmas falls on a Wednesday (working day) and 1 January on a Saturday (non-working day). The caretaker claims an extra day for 1 January.

Application pratique:

Mr. Dupont can refuse based on this case law. He must explain to the caretaker that since Saturday is a non-working day, no leave day was lost. To avoid any dispute, it is advisable to remind the rule in writing and, if the caretaker insists, to suggest a consultation with a specialised lawyer.

2

Employee of a real estate agency in Brive-la-Gaillarde

Mrs. Martin, a real estate agent in Brive-la-Gaillarde, has her leave counted in business days (Monday to Saturday). She takes leave from 20 December to 5 January. Christmas Day falls on a Wednesday (business day) but her agency is closed that day (day off). She believes she is entitled to an extra day of leave.

Application pratique:

In this case, since the count is in business days, the public holiday coinciding with a business day (even if not worked in the company) entitles to a one-day extension. Mrs. Martin can claim an extra day. The employer must grant this day, otherwise risk a conviction at the industrial tribunal.

3

Co-ownership syndic in Limoges managing building staff

The syndic of the co-ownership 'Les Jardins de l'Aurence' in Limoges employs two caretakers. The contract provides for a count in working days. One caretaker requests leave in August, a period including 15 August (Assumption). 15 August falls on a Thursday (working day). The caretaker claims an extra day because 15 August is a public holiday.

Application pratique:

The syndic must refuse: 15 August being a working day, it is included in the leave, without extension. He can inform the caretaker that only a public holiday falling on a non-working day (Sunday) could, according to certain agreements, give rise to compensation, but not in this case. It is recommended to clarify the rule in the employment contract from the outset.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide