Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Real estate case law: analysis and practical advice

📅 Décision du 21 March 2006⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The Court of Appeal legally justified its decision in holding that it was not proven by the consignment note or any other document that the air carrier, to whom a shipper had entrusted a package containing a tender for the construction of motorway structures, knew that a one-day delay in delivery would deprive the shipper of the opportunity to participate in the tender process and would cause it the damage for which it sought compensation; it was therefore able to deduce that this carrier had not been aware of the probability of the damage that its fault could cause.

Reference decision: cc • No. 04-19.246 • 2006-03-21 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The Court of Appeal legally justified its decision in holding that it was not proven by the consignment note or any other document that the air carrier, to whom a shipper had entrusted a package containing a tender for the construction of motorway structures, knew that a one-day delay in delivery would deprive the shipper of the opportunity to participate in the tender process and would cause it the damage for which it sought compensation; it was therefore able to deduce that this carrier had not been aware of the probability of the damage that its fault could cause.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 04-19.246
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 21 mars 2006

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide