Aller au contenu principal
The condition relating to the confiscable nature
Droit-immobilier

The condition relating to the confiscable nature

📅 Décision du 05 December 2018⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 7 vues📖 2 min de lecture

The condition relating to the confiscable nature, under French law, of the property concerned by the request for mutual assistance, set out in Article 713-37, 2°, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which aims to exclude the enforcement of a foreign confiscation order contrary to the rules in force on national territory, is assessed in the light of the rules applicable on the date on which the French court seised of the request rules. An order is not subject to censure if, relying on the provisions of Article 131-21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in force on the date on which the Court of Appeal ruled, it authorised, after verifying that the conditions were met, the enforcement in France of a value confiscation ordered by a foreign court over a property of which the convicted person was not the owner but had free disposal.

Reference decision: cc • No. 17-86.695 • 2018-12-05 • View decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The condition relating to the confiscable nature, under French law, of the property concerned by the request for mutual assistance, set out in Article 713-37, 2°, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which aims to exclude the enforcement of a foreign confiscation order contrary to the rules in force on national territory, is assessed in the light of the rules applicable on the date on which the French court seised of the request rules. An order is not subject to censure if, relying on the provisions of Article 131-21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in force on the date on which the Court of Appeal ruled, it authorised, after verifying that the conditions were met, the enforcement in France of a value confiscation ordered by a foreign court over a property of which the convicted person was not the owner but had free disposal.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 17-86.695
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 05 décembre 2018

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord facing foreign confiscation order

A landlord in Paris (Paris) owns a flat rented to a tenant convicted of drug trafficking in Germany. The German court issues a value confiscation order over the flat, even though the landlord is the owner. The French court must decide whether to enforce the order.

Application pratique:

Under this case law, the French court will assess the confiscation order based on current French law. Since the tenant has free disposal of the property (as a tenant), the court may authorize enforcement if conditions are met. The landlord should immediately provide proof of ownership and argue that the tenant does not have free disposal in a sense that would allow confiscation of the property itself. Consult a French real estate lawyer to contest the enforcement and protect your ownership.

2

First-time buyer with title dispute

A first-time buyer in Lyon (Lyon) purchases an apartment, but later discovers a foreign court had issued a confiscation order against the previous owner. The buyer fears losing the property.

Application pratique:

The case law confirms that French courts apply current law at the time of ruling, not at the time of the order. If the buyer acquired the property in good faith before the enforcement request, they may have a defense. The buyer should gather all purchase documents and prove they are a bona fide purchaser for value. Act quickly to file a motion with the French court to oppose enforcement, citing your ownership rights.

3

Co-owner in dispute over shared asset

In Nice (Nice), a co-owner owns a 50% share of a holiday home. The other co-owner is convicted of fraud in Italy, and an Italian confiscation order targets the entire property. The French court considers enforcement.

Application pratique:

This case law shows that enforcement may be allowed if the convicted person had free disposal of the property. However, as a co-owner, you have ownership rights. You should argue that your share is not subject to confiscation because you are not the convicted person. Provide the co-ownership agreement and evidence of your separate interest. A lawyer can help file a claim to protect your share from enforcement.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide