Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014,

📅 Décision du 16 November 2023⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014, which, in that it amended Article L. 145-15 of the Commercial Code, replaced the nullity of clauses having the effect of defeating the right to renewal with their being deemed unwritten, is applicable to current leases and the action seeking to have a clause of the lease deemed unwritten is not subject to any limitation period. Thus, the action seeking to have a clause having the effect of defeating the right to renewal deemed unwritten, brought after the entry into force of the Law of 18 June 2014 and relating to a lease in progress at that date, is admissible even though the limitation period for the action for nullity of that same clause would have expired on the date of entry into force of the new law.

Reference decision: cc • N° 22-14.091 • 2023-11-16 • View the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014, which, in that it amended Article L. 145-15 of the Commercial Code, replaced the nullity of clauses having the effect of defeating the right to renewal with their being deemed unwritten, is applicable to current leases and the action seeking to have a clause of the lease deemed unwritten is not subject to any limitation period. Thus, the action seeking to have a clause having the effect of defeating the right to renewal deemed unwritten, brought after the entry into force of the Law of 18 June 2014 and relating to a lease in progress at that date, is admissible even though the limitation period for the action for nullity of that same clause would have expired on the date of entry into force of the new law.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-14.091
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 16 novembre 2023

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide