Aller au contenu principal
Decree of 27 September 1955 on
Droit-foncier

Decree of 27 September 1955 on

📅 Décision du 10 March 1965⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 vues📖 2 min de lecture

The Decree of 27 September 1955 on the revision of the Rural Code introduced into that code paragraph 1° of Article 53, which is merely the literal reproduction of Article 32 of the Law of 19 February 1942 on uncultivated and abandoned land. This decree, regardless of the place it assigned to Article 53 in the Rural Code, which provides for criminal penalties, could not extend it to acts of obstructing the cultivation of consolidated plots, especially since Law No. 60-792 of 2 August 1960 on consolidation does not refer to Article 53(1).

Reference decision: cc • No. 64-91.638 • 1965-03-10 • View decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The Decree of 27 September 1955 on the revision of the Rural Code introduced into that code paragraph 1° of Article 53, which is merely the literal reproduction of Article 32 of the Law of 19 February 1942 on uncultivated and abandoned land. This decree, regardless of the place it assigned to Article 53 in the Rural Code, which provides for criminal penalties, could not extend it to acts of obstructing the cultivation of consolidated plots, especially since Law No. 60-792 of 2 August 1960 on consolidation does not refer to Article 53(1).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly observe legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 64-91.638
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 10 mars 1965

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord facing tenant's cultivation obstruction

A landlord in rural Provence (Aix-en-Provence) owns agricultural land that was consolidated under the 1960 law. A neighbouring farmer, relying on an old decree from 1955, tries to prevent the landlord from planting vines on his consolidated plot, claiming the right to cultivate it himself.

Application pratique:

This case law clarifies that the 1955 decree's criminal penalties for obstructing cultivation do not apply to consolidated plots under the 1960 law. The landlord should ignore the neighbour's claim, as the 1960 law overrides the 1955 decree. To protect his rights, the landlord should gather his consolidation documents and send a formal notice to the neighbour. If the obstruction continues, he can seek a court order for peaceful possession without fear of criminal liability under the 1955 decree.

2

First-time buyer of consolidated farm plot

A first-time buyer in Brittany (Rennes) purchases a small plot that was part of a land consolidation scheme in 1962. The seller mentions a potential claim from a former owner under Article 53(1) of the Rural Code, threatening to block the buyer's farming plans.

Application pratique:

The case law confirms that Article 53(1) of the Rural Code (from the 1955 decree) does not apply to consolidated land under the 1960 consolidation law. The buyer can safely proceed with farming without fear of criminal penalties for obstructing cultivation. He should verify that the plot is indeed consolidated and keep all sale documents. To avoid future disputes, he should register his ownership and, if any claim arises, cite the 1965 decision to assert his rights.

3

Co-owner in dispute over common land use

In a co-ownership in Lyon, a group of co-owners wants to cultivate a common garden area on land that was consolidated years ago. One co-owner, citing the 1955 decree, threatens to report them for obstructing cultivation, claiming he has a right to farm the land himself.

Application pratique:

The case law makes clear that the 1955 decree's criminal provisions do not extend to consolidated plots. The co-owners can safely proceed with gardening without risk of criminal sanctions. They should document the consolidation history and the co-ownership rules. If the dissenting co-owner persists, they can seek a declaratory judgment confirming that the 1955 decree is inapplicable, relying on this 1965 decision to resolve the dispute.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide