Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

Private individuals unable to invoke

📅 Décision du 29 January 1992⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Private individuals may invoke before the courts of ordinary jurisdiction a breach of planning rules, even where the administrative court has pronounced the annulment of planning permission, only if they establish the existence of personal loss directly connected with the breach and not with the mere presence of the buildings whose planning permission has been annulled; a court of appeal which finds that the loss resulting from the irregularity of the construction was non-existent legally justifies its decision by dismissing the claimants' demolition action.

Reference decision: cc • N° 90-10.113 • 1992-01-29 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Private individuals may invoke before the courts of ordinary jurisdiction a breach of planning rules, even where the administrative court has pronounced the annulment of planning permission, only if they establish the existence of personal loss directly connected with the breach and not with the mere presence of the buildings whose planning permission has been annulled; a court of appeal which finds that the loss resulting from the irregularity of the construction was non-existent legally justifies its decision by dismissing the claimants' demolition action.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 90-10.113
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 29 janvier 1992

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Foncier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit foncier

Tous les articles Foncier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide