Reference decision: cc • N° 99-21.174 • 2003-09-23 • View the decision →
This decision provides important insight into property law. Here is what it changes for you.
The situation
The enforcement of the guarantee provided for by Article 1638 of the Civil Code, being the consequence of a commitment freely entered into by the parties to the contract, cannot constitute loss for which the notary who drew up the deed could be held liable to compensate. Therefore, a judgment is liable to be quashed if it orders a notary who omitted to mention an easement in a deed of sale to indemnify the seller against the judgment given against the seller in favour of the buyer on the basis of that guarantee, without finding that the buyer suffered loss resulting from the impossibility of obtaining any reimbursement.
What the law says
This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.
Key points
- Strictly comply with the legal time limits for bringing claims
- Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
- Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation
For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes |
→ Browse all our legal articles
