Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

The enforcement of the guarantee provided for by

📅 Décision du 23 September 2003⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The enforcement of the guarantee provided for by Article 1638 of the Civil Code, being the consequence of a commitment freely entered into by the parties to the contract, cannot constitute loss for which the notary who drew up the deed could be held liable to compensate. Therefore, a judgment is liable to be quashed if it orders a notary who omitted to mention an easement in a deed of sale to indemnify the seller against the judgment given against the seller in favour of the buyer on the basis of that guarantee, without finding that the buyer suffered loss resulting from the impossibility of obtaining any reimbursement.

Reference decision: cc • N° 99-21.174 • 2003-09-23 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The enforcement of the guarantee provided for by Article 1638 of the Civil Code, being the consequence of a commitment freely entered into by the parties to the contract, cannot constitute loss for which the notary who drew up the deed could be held liable to compensate. Therefore, a judgment is liable to be quashed if it orders a notary who omitted to mention an easement in a deed of sale to indemnify the seller against the judgment given against the seller in favour of the buyer on the basis of that guarantee, without finding that the buyer suffered loss resulting from the impossibility of obtaining any reimbursement.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 99-21.174
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 23 septembre 2003

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide