Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

Property dispute: understanding your rights and remedies

📅 Décision du 22 February 1965⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Seised, by the owner of a unit in a building in co-ownership, of an action seeking to compel the other co-owners to waive the right to build on the land forming an internal garden and constituting one of the common parts of the building, such waiver being required by the mayor to authorise works planned by the claimant in accordance with the co-ownership regulations, the trial judges merely apply, without distorting them, the provisions of the said regulations, which are moreover in this respect consistent with those of the Act of 28 June 1938, when, noting that the termination of the non-building easement currently encumbering the common courtyard is subject to the decision of the co-owners to demolish the existing buildings around that courtyard and to build others on its current location, they recognise that the co-owners are entitled to exercise the option arising from the possibility of extinguishing the easement.

Reference decision: cc • No. 62-13.114 • 1965-02-22 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Seised, by the owner of a unit in a building in co-ownership, of an action seeking to compel the other co-owners to waive the right to build on the land forming an internal garden and constituting one of the common parts of the building, such waiver being required by the mayor to authorise works planned by the claimant in accordance with the co-ownership regulations, the trial judges merely apply, without distorting them, the provisions of the said regulations, which are moreover in this respect consistent with those of the Act of 28 June 1938, when, noting that the termination of the non-building easement currently encumbering the common courtyard is subject to the decision of the co-owners to demolish the existing buildings around that courtyard and to build others on its current location, they recognise that the co-owners are entitled to exercise the option arising from the possibility of extinguishing the easement.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for taking action.
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence).
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 62-13.114
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 février 1965

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide