Reference decision: cc • No. 74-13.526 • 1976-03-01 • View the decision →
This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.
The situation
Breaches the provisions of Article 4 of the Decree of 9 September 1971, the Court of Appeal which, seised of a party's submissions seeking termination of the disputed agreement on account of the other contracting party's fault due to delay in delivery of the equipment that was the subject of the contract, merely held that, rescission of the sale not being requested by either party, each of them had to perform the obligations incumbent upon it.
What the law says
This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.
Key takeaways
- Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
- Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, letters)
- Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation
For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail |
→ Browse all our legal articles
