Aller au contenu principal
Handwritten clause for notarised promise to sell: what changes with the ruling of 18 March 2021
Droit-immobilier

Handwritten clause for notarised promise to sell: what changes with the ruling of 18 March 2021

📅 Décision du 18 March 2021⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled that the handwritten clause required by former Article L.312-17 of the Consumer Code does not apply to promises to sell executed in notarised form before a notary. This decision clarifies the rights of purchasers and secures property transactions.

Reference decision: cc • N° 20-16.354 • 2021-03-18 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are on the verge of buying the house of your dreams in Sète, the one with a view of the port. The notary presents you with the promise to sell, you sign, everything seems perfect. But a few days later, your bank refuses the loan. You were relying on the suspensive condition of obtaining the loan (the clause that cancels the sale if you do not have the financing). Except that in the deed, the waiver of this condition is typed on a computer, not written by hand. So, is the sale voidable? This is exactly the question that arose in the case decided by the Court of Cassation on 18 March 2021. And the answer might surprise you.

This decision, number 20-16.354, resolves a dispute between purchasers and a seller over a simple formality: the handwritten clause. Until then, many thought that any waiver of a suspensive condition had to be written in the purchaser's own hand, on pain of nullity. But the high court said no: when the promise is notarised (i.e., executed before a notary), this requirement disappears. In short, purchasers cannot withdraw by invoking the absence of a handwritten clause.

So, what does this change for you, whether you are an owner, tenant or property professional in Montpellier, Agde or elsewhere? A lot. This ruling secures property sales and prevents untimely cancellations. But be careful, not everything is allowed. Let's break down this decision, its facts, its reasoning, and above all, what you need to remember for your projects.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr and Mrs X, a retired couple living in Agde, wished to sell their flat to buy a house in Sète. They signed a promise to sell with purchasers, Mr and Mrs Y, before a notary. The deed provided for a suspensive condition of obtaining a loan (i.e., the sale would only go through if the purchasers obtained their financing). But the Y quickly waived this condition by signing an addendum to the promise. Problem: the waiver was typed, not handwritten. A few months later, the purchasers failed to obtain their loan and turned against the sellers: they argued that the waiver was void because it was not handwritten, and that the suspensive condition therefore remained in force. Consequently, for lack of a loan, the sale would be void.

The sellers, for their part, considered the waiver valid and that the purchasers were obliged to buy. The dispute went to the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Montpellier, then to the Court of Appeal of Montpellier. The lower courts ruled in favour of the purchasers: according to them, former Article L.312-17 of the Consumer Code requires a handwritten clause for any waiver of the suspensive condition, even in a notarised deed. The sale was therefore annulled. The sellers, furious, appealed to the Court of Cassation.

Before the Court of Cassation, the debate focused on one specific point: does the formality of a handwritten clause apply to notarised promises? The sellers argued that the law protects consumers, but that a notarised deed already provides all guarantees. The purchasers retorted that the law does not distinguish. Who would prevail?

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The Court of Cassation quashed the Court of Appeal's decision. It relied on former Article L.312-17 of the Consumer Code, which provides that for promises to sell, the suspensive condition of obtaining a loan must be mentioned in writing, and that the waiver of this condition must be made by a handwritten clause of the purchaser. But the Court specified that this formality only applies to private promises (i.e., signed between individuals without a notary). For notarised promises, executed before a notary, the law does not require it. In other words, the handwritten clause is a protection for non-notarised deeds, because the notary already guarantees the understanding and consent of the parties.

What few people know is that this interpretation is logical: Article L.312-17 (now replaced by Article L.313-41 of the Consumer Code) was designed to protect the non-professional purchaser in private sales, where they may be vulnerable. But in a notarised deed, the notary has a duty to advise and inform. The Court of Cassation therefore considered the additional formality of a handwritten clause to be superfluous. Consequently, the typed waiver is valid, and the suspensive condition is lifted. The purchasers are obliged to buy, even without a loan.

This decision is a confirmation of previous case law (notably Cass. civ. 3e, 9 June 2016, n°15-16.748). It is not a reversal, but it clarifies a grey area. The judges thus rejected the purchasers' argument that the handwritten clause is a rule of public policy (mandatory) that applies to all deeds. No, said the Court: it only concerns private deeds.

What this changes for you — concretely

If you are a seller or purchaser in the Montpellier area, this decision is good news for legal certainty. Here are the implications by profile:

For the seller (landlord or private individual): You can be reassured: if you sign a notarised promise to sell and the purchaser waives the suspensive condition by a typed writing, this waiver is valid. The purchaser cannot withdraw by invoking the absence of a handwritten clause. Concrete example: in Agde, a seller was able to force the sale after the purchaser waived by a simple typed letter. Without this decision, he would have had to refund the deposit and suffer a loss.

For the purchaser (future owner): Be careful: if you waive the suspensive condition in a notarised deed, you are definitively committed. You cannot go back on the pretext that the clause is not handwritten. So, before waiving, make sure you have your loan or can finance the purchase otherwise. A mistake could cost you dearly: in Sète, a purchaser had to pay damages of 10% of the price for wrongfully withdrawing.

For the notary and professionals: This case law secures your deeds. You do not have to require a handwritten clause for waivers in notarised deeds. But you must always inform the parties of the consequences. If you are in this situation, you must verify that the waiver is clear and unambiguous, even if typed. In case of doubt, have a separate document signed.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Never waive the suspensive condition without having your loan: Wait for the bank's firm agreement. An early waiver exposes you to having to buy without financing, with penalties.
  • Use a notary for any promise to sell: The notarised deed protects you better than a private deed. The notary verifies your consent and advises you.
  • Require the waiver to be in writing and signed, even if typed: The form is not handwritten, but it must be dated and signed by both parties. Keep an original.
  • If in doubt about the validity of a clause, consult a lawyer before signing: A quick consultation (€45 with Maître Zakine) can save you from a costly dispute.

This decision is part of a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. Already, in a judgment of 9 June 2016 (n°15-16.748), the third civil chamber had ruled that a handwritten clause is not required for notarised promises. More recently, the Court confirmed this position in a judgment of 27 January 2021 (n°19-23.419). The trend is therefore clear: the judges favour the security of property transactions and limit excessive formalities.

However, note: this rule only applies to promises to sell. For other deeds, such as mortgage loan contracts, the handwritten clause remains mandatory (Article L.313-41 of the Consumer Code). Moreover, if the promise is private, the handwritten clause is mandatory. So do not generalise. What this means for the future: the courts will continue to distinguish according to the form of the deed. For professionals, it is essential to properly qualify the deed.

Frequently asked questions

Q: Can I waive the suspensive condition by email?
A: Yes, if the promise is notarised, the writing can be electronic, provided it is electronically signed and complies with the rules of the Civil Code. But a signed paper document is better to avoid any challenge.

Q: What if I have waived the suspensive condition and my loan is refused?
A: You are obliged to buy. You can try to negotiate an extension with the seller or find other financing. Otherwise, you risk damages (often 10% of the price). Consult a lawyer.

Q: Does this decision apply to promises signed before 2021?
A: Yes, because it interprets a previous law. But check the date of your deed and the specific conditions. If in doubt, seek advice.

Q: Can a notary refuse to draft a typed waiver?
A: No, but he must inform you of the consequences. If he requires a handwritten clause, it is out of excessive caution, but it is not mandatory.

Q: What is the difference between a notarised promise and a private promise?
A: The notarised promise is executed before a notary, who guarantees the date, signature and consent. The private promise is signed between individuals, without a notary. The handwritten clause is only mandatory for the latter.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je renoncer à la condition suspensive par email ?

Oui, si la promesse est authentique, l'écrit peut être électronique, à condition d'être signé électroniquement et de respecter les règles du code civil. Mais mieux vaut un écrit papier signé pour éviter toute contestation.

Que faire si j'ai renoncé à la condition suspensive et que mon prêt est refusé ?

Vous êtes tenu d'acheter. Vous pouvez tenter de négocier un délai avec le vendeur ou trouver un autre financement. Sinon, vous risquez des dommages-intérêts (souvent 10 % du prix). Consultez un avocat.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle aux promesses signées avant 2021 ?

Oui, car elle interprète une loi antérieure. Mais vérifiez la date de votre acte et les conditions spécifiques. En cas de doute, demandez conseil.

Un notaire peut-il refuser de rédiger une renonciation dactylographiée ?

Non, mais il doit vous informer des conséquences. S'il exige une mention manuscrite, c'est par excès de prudence, mais ce n'est pas obligatoire.

Quelle est la différence entre une promesse authentique et sous seing privé ?

La promesse authentique est reçue par un notaire, qui garantit la date, la signature et le consentement. La promesse sous seing privé est signée entre particuliers, sans notaire. La mention manuscrite n'est obligatoire que pour cette dernière.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 20-16.354
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 mars 2021

Mots-clés

mention manuscritepromesse de venteacte authentiquecondition suspensiveCour de cassationdroit immobiliernotaire

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Seller in Agde: purchaser waives without handwritten clause

Mr. Martin sells his flat in Agde. The purchasers sign a notarised promise then waive the suspensive condition by a typed writing. They fail to obtain their loan and try to cancel the sale.

Application pratique:

Thanks to the ruling of 18 March 2021, the waiver is valid. Mr. Martin can demand the sale or seek damages. He must keep the writing and the promise. If the purchasers refuse, he can take the matter to court.

2

Purchaser in Sète: early waiver and loan refused

Ms. Dupont buys a house in Sète. She waives the suspensive condition in the notarised deed, thinking her loan is secured. Finally, the bank refuses.

Application pratique:

Ms. Dupont is obliged to buy. She can try to renegotiate with the seller or find other financing. Failing that, she risks penalties. A lawyer can help her negotiate or challenge if the loan was refused for an unforeseeable reason.

3

Notary in Montpellier: drafting a notarised promise

A notary in Montpellier prepares a notarised promise to sell for clients. They wish to waive the suspensive condition by a handwritten clause, but the notary tells them it is not mandatory.

Application pratique:

The notary is correct: the handwritten clause is not required. He must nevertheless clearly explain the consequences of the waiver and ensure that the clients consent with full knowledge of the facts. He can draft the deed without a handwritten clause, but must have it signed.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide