Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

Are not contrary to the right to

📅 Décision du 26 March 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Are not contrary to the right to respect for private and family life and the home, guaranteed by Article 8, § 1, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the provisions of Articles L. 461-1 and L. 461-3 of the Town Planning Code, which impose no other specification as to the circumstances justifying the inspection of premises accommodating homes or premises comprising parts used for residential purposes for the purpose of checking compliance with town planning rules than the existence of constructions, developments, installations or works completed less than six years previously

Reference decision: cc • N° 25-10.744 • 2026-03-26

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Are not contrary to the right to respect for private and family life and the home, guaranteed by Article 8, § 1, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the provisions of Articles L. 461-1 and L. 461-3 of the Town Planning Code, which impose no other specification as to the circumstances justifying the inspection of premises accommodating homes or premises comprising parts used for residential purposes for the purpose of checking compliance with town planning rules than the existence of constructions, developments, installations or works completed less than six years previously

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, documents, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 25-10.744
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 26 mars 2026

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Foncier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit foncier

Tous les articles Foncier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide