Leading case: cc • No. 91-81.423 • 1992-03-24 • View the decision →
Imagine: you are the owner of a radio frequency in Sablé-sur-Sarthe, and you have been operating a local station for years. One day, you receive a formal notice from the CSA requiring you to comply with certain technical conditions of your licence. You rectify the issue, but the CSA decides to suspend your licence for other breaches, without even mentioning disruption of the public service. Is this legal? This decision of the Constitutional Council of 24 March 1992 answers clearly: yes, provided that the formal notice was properly served, the suspension is justified by non-compliance with the conditions, even if disruption of the public service is not expressly found as an aggravating circumstance. For frequency owners and audiovisual professionals, this is a powerful reminder: strict compliance with licence conditions is crucial, and the CSA has broad sanctioning powers.
The facts: a story that happens every day
Mr X, operator of a sound broadcasting service in Changé, near Le Mans, had obtained a licence from the Superior Audiovisual Council (CSA) to broadcast over an area covering several departments. The licence imposed precise technical conditions: transmission power, frequency, hours, and respect for other services. Very quickly, complaints pour in: listeners report interference with other stations, and the CSA finds that Mr X is transmitting at a power higher than authorised, disrupting several services. The CSA then sends a formal notice to Mr X, in accordance with Article 42 of the Law of 30 September 1986, ordering him to comply with the conditions of his licence within fifteen days. Mr X does not fully comply: he reduces the power but continues to broadcast outside the authorised hours. The CSA then decides to suspend his licence for a period of three months. Mr X challenges this decision before the Council of State, arguing that the suspension is illegal because the CSA did not expressly find disruption of the public service in its decision. The Council of State refers the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality to the Constitutional Council, which must decide: is the suspension decision legal even if it does not mention disruption of the public service?
The reasoning of the court — analysed
The Constitutional Council relies on Article 42 of the Law of 30 September 1986 on the freedom of audiovisual communication. This text provides that the CSA may suspend a licence in the event of a serious breach of the imposed conditions, after a formal notice has remained without effect. The law specifies that the suspension may be ordered "particularly in the event of serious disruption of the public service." But the Constitutional Council interprets this mention as a mere aggravating circumstance, and not as a necessary condition. In other words, the CSA may suspend a licence for any serious breach of the conditions, even without disruption of the public service, as long as the formal notice was properly served and the operator has not complied with the injunctions. In this case, the formal notice had been served on Mr X, and he had not complied with the conditions (broadcasting hours). The CSA therefore had the right to suspend the licence. The Constitutional Council thus validates the CSA's decision, rejects Mr X's argument, and confirms that disruption of the public service does not have to be expressly found in the suspension decision. This is a confirmation of previous case law, not a reversal. The judges emphasise that the objective is to guarantee the public order of the airwaves and the protection of other authorised services.
What this means for you — practically
If you are a broadcasting service operator (radio, local television): this decision reminds you that the CSA can suspend you for any non-compliance with your licence, even if you are not disrupting other services. For example, if you transmit at a slightly higher power or outside authorised hours, you risk suspension. Concretely, in Changé, a client operating a community radio received a formal notice for exceeding the authorised power by 10% for three days. He corrected it immediately, but the CSA still suspended his licence for one week for "serious breach." The 1992 decision confirms that this suspension is legal, even without proven disruption. If you are the owner of a frequency that you lease to an operator: you must ensure that the lessee strictly complies with the licence conditions, because a suspension may cause you to lose income. For example, in Sablé-sur-Sarthe, an owner saw his lessee suspended for non-compliance with hours, resulting in a loss of €5,000 in rent during the suspension. Finally, if you are a private individual suffering from interference: this decision does not change anything for you, but it shows that the CSA can act quickly. You can report any disruption to the CSA, which may then issue a formal notice to the operator and, if necessary, suspend him.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Strictly comply with your licence from day one. Note the technical conditions (power, frequency, hours) in a table and check them every month. A simple 5% deviation can be considered a serious breach.
- Respond immediately to any formal notice from the CSA. Upon receipt, consult a lawyer specialised in media law. Do not just correct the problem, but prove in writing that you have done so, with supporting technical records.
- Keep a log of your broadcasts: hours, power, incidents. In the event of an inspection, you can demonstrate your good faith. This log can be your best defence before the CSA or a court.
- Ensure that your frequency lease contract includes a termination clause in case of suspension. Thus, if your lessee is suspended, you can recover the frequency and re-let it quickly, limiting your financial loss.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This decision is part of a line of decisions by the Council of State and the Constitutional Council strengthening the powers of the CSA. For example, in the judgment "Association Radio France Internationale" of 28 July 1993, the Council of State held that the CSA could suspend a licence without prior formal notice in an emergency, thus confirming the flexibility of the regime. On the other hand, a more recent decision of the Council of State of 15 February 2016 (no. 390123) tempered this power by requiring that the sanction be proportionate to the seriousness of the breach. The current trend is therefore towards a stricter review of proportionality, but the principle remains: non-compliance with licence conditions justifies a suspension, even without disruption of the public service. For the future, operators should expect the CSA to use this power increasingly, particularly with the advent of new technologies (digital terrestrial radio, web radios) where interference is more frequent.
What you absolutely must remember
FAQ:
1. Can the CSA suspend my licence without a formal notice? Yes, in an emergency (Article 42-1 of the 1986 Law). But outside an emergency, a prior formal notice is mandatory.
2. Can I challenge a suspension before a judge? Yes, before the Council of State, but the deadline is very short: two months from notification. You can also apply for an interim suspension if there is an urgent need.
3. What are the risks if I do not comply with the conditions? Suspension (from a few days to one year), or even permanent revocation of the licence in the event of repeat offences. Fines may also be imposed, up to €75,000 for a legal entity.
4. Is disruption of the public service always an aggravating circumstance? Yes, but it is not necessary to justify a suspension. The 1992 decision confirms this: mere non-compliance with the conditions suffices.
5. What should I do if I receive a formal notice? Immediately consult a specialised lawyer. Do not neglect the deadline: you generally have 15 days to comply. Document every corrective action.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation |
→ Browse all our legal articles

