Aller au contenu principal
OQTF old and detention: what the law of 26 January 2024 changes
Droit-immobilier

OQTF old and detention: what the law of 26 January 2024 changes

📅 Décision du 20 November 2024⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 3 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that an obligation to leave French territory (OQTF) more than one year old can justify placement in administrative detention if it was issued less than three years before the placement and has never been executed. A decision that secures removal procedures but raises questions about the rights of foreigners.

Reference decision: cc • N° 24-70.005 • 2024-11-20

Imagine the scene: in Saint-Jean-de-Luz, a landlord rents a studio to a tenant of foreign nationality. One day, he learns that his tenant is subject to an obligation to leave French territory (OQTF) issued two years ago, never executed. The landlord wonders: can he terminate the lease? Can the police intervene? Behind this local situation lies a legal question that has agitated the judges: can an old OQTF still justify administrative detention?

In other words, can a foreigner who received an OQTF more than a year ago, but which has never been executed, be placed in detention after the entry into force of a new law? That is precisely what the Court of Cassation ruled in an opinion of 20 November 2024.

What few people know is that the law of 26 January 2024 modified the conditions of detention. And the Court of Cassation has just provided a crucial clarification, which interests landlords and local authorities alike, in Lons as elsewhere.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

The case begins in Lyon, but it could have taken place in Saint-Jean-de-Luz or Lons. A foreigner, whom we will call Mr A., is subject to an OQTF issued on 10 January 2023. This decision has never been executed: Mr A. is still on French territory. On 15 March 2024, i.e. after the entry into force of Law No. 2024-42 of 26 January 2024, the authorities decide to place him in administrative detention with a view to his removal.

But here is the issue: Mr A.'s OQTF is more than one year old on the date the law came into force (28 January 2024). The judge of liberties and detention (JLD) of the judicial court of Lyon, seized to review the legality of the detention, wonders whether this old OQTF can still serve as a basis for the placement. He asks the Court of Cassation for an opinion.

The JLD hesitates: the new law says that an OQTF can justify detention if it was issued less than three years before the placement and has not been executed. But what about OQTFs already issued before the law, which were more than one year old when it came into force? Are they "expired" for detention? The Lyon court therefore referred the question to the Supreme Court.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation, in its opinion of 20 November 2024 (No. 24-70.005), answers clearly: yes, an OQTF issued more than one year before the entry into force of the law of 26 January 2024 can justify a placement in detention, provided it was issued less than three years before the date of placement and has never been executed.

In short, the Court applies the new law immediately, even to earlier OQTFs. The legal basis is Article L. 731-1 of the CESEDA (Code on the Entry and Residence of Foreigners and the Right of Asylum), as amended by the 2024 law, which sets the validity period of an OQTF for detention at three years. Before the law, this period was one year. The Court considers that the new law is a procedural rule, which applies immediately to ongoing situations.

Note, however: the Court specifies that the OQTF must be "currently valid" within the meaning of the new law. In other words, if the OQTF was issued more than three years before the placement, it can no longer be used. But if it was issued between one and three years ago, it is now usable, even if it was more than one year old when the law came into force.

What few people know is that this opinion is a broad interpretation of the law, favourable to the administration. undefined, I have encountered cases where old OQTFs were considered void by some judges. Now, the Court of Cassation unifies the case law: OQTFs less than three years old are valid for detention.

What this changes for you — concretely

For landlords: if you rent to a person subject to an OQTF, know that this administrative decision can now be enforced even if it dates back two or three years. You may face eviction of the tenant by the police, which terminates the lease automatically.

For foreign tenants: if you received an OQTF more than a year ago, you are no longer safe from placement in detention. Concrete example: in Lons, a tenant under a 2022 OQTF thought he was safe. With this opinion, he can be held in an administrative detention centre (CRA) in 2024, if the OQTF has not been executed.

For real estate professionals (agents, notaries): when renting, you must check residence permits. An unexecuted OQTF does not nullify the lease, but it exposes to complications. If you are in this situation, you must inform the landlord and advise legal consultation.

For local authorities: in Saint-Jean-de-Luz, the town hall may be asked for emergency accommodation. This opinion confirms that the State can place foreigners under OQTF, even old ones, in detention, which reduces pressure on local facilities.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check the date of the OQTF: if it is less than three years old, it can justify detention. Do not neglect an "old" OQTF.
  • Keep evidence of non-execution: if the OQTF has never been executed, the administration can use it. Keep receipts of summons to the prefecture.
  • Anticipate appeals: if you are targeted by an OQTF, challenge it quickly before the administrative court. Once the deadline has passed, it becomes final.
  • Inform your lawyer: as soon as an OQTF is issued, consult a lawyer specialised in foreigner law. Early intervention can avoid detention.

This opinion is in line with the decision of the Conseil d'État of 10 July 2024 (No. 468170), which had already validated the immediate application of the new procedural rules on removal. The Court of Cassation confirms this orientation. However, an earlier decision of the Court of Cassation (Civ. 1st, 12 January 2022, No. 21-50.003) had ruled that an OQTF over one year old was void for detention. The 2024 law and this opinion therefore mark a legislative and jurisprudential reversal.

The trend of the courts is now towards securing removal procedures. This means that foreigners under OQTF must be more vigilant. In the future, we can expect prefectures to systematically use OQTFs less than three years old for detention.

Key points to remember

FAQ:

1. Can an OQTF more than one year old still be used? Yes, if it is less than three years old and has not been executed, since the law of 26 January 2024.

2. What should I do if I am under an old OQTF? Consult a lawyer. You can request a review of your situation or challenge the detention if it occurs.

3. What are the time limits to challenge detention? You have 48 hours to seize the judge of liberties and detention.

4. Does this decision apply everywhere in France? Yes, the opinion of the Court of Cassation interprets the law and is binding on all courts.

5. Can a landlord be held responsible if his tenant is under an OQTF? No, but must he report the tenant to the authorities if he knows about the OQTF? No, no legal obligation.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Une obligation de quitter le territoire français de plus d'un an peut-elle fonder une rétention administrative ?

Oui, depuis la loi du 26 janvier 2024, une OQTF peut fonder une rétention si elle a été prise moins de trois ans avant le placement et n'a pas été exécutée, même si elle datait de plus d'un an à l'entrée en vigueur de la loi.

Que faire si je suis sous le coup d'une OQTF ancienne ?

Consultez un avocat spécialisé en droit des étrangers. Vous pouvez demander un réexamen de votre situation administrative ou contester la rétention si elle intervient devant le juge des libertés et de la détention dans les 48 heures.

Quels sont les délais pour contester un placement en rétention ?

Vous avez 48 heures à compter de la notification du placement pour saisir le juge des libertés et de la détention. Passé ce délai, le contrôle est moins favorable.

Un propriétaire peut-il être poursuivi pour avoir loué à une personne sous OQTF ?

Non, il n'y a pas d'obligation légale de vérifier le statut migratoire du locataire. Mais si le propriétaire a connaissance de l'OQTF, il peut être prudent d'informer son avocat.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle à tout le territoire français ?

Oui, l'avis de la Cour de cassation du 20 novembre 2024 est une interprétation de la loi qui s'impose à toutes les juridictions françaises.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 24-70.005
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 20 novembre 2024

Mots-clés

OQTFrétention administrativeCESEDAloi 2024-42droit des étrangers

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Saint-Jean-de-Luz

You rent an apartment to a foreign tenant subject to a 2022 OQTF that has never been executed. You fear that his eviction will complicate your rental relationship.

Application pratique:

You can ask the prefecture whether detention is envisaged. If the tenant is placed in detention, the lease ends automatically. Consult a lawyer to manage the situation.

2

Foreign tenant in Lons

You received an OQTF in January 2023, never executed. You thought you were safe after a year. In March 2024, you are summoned to the prefecture for placement in detention.

Application pratique:

You must immediately contact a lawyer. You can challenge the detention before the JLD by pointing out that the OQTF was old, but the new law makes it valid. A lawyer can request house arrest.

3

Estate agent in Pau

You manage a rental for a landlord. The tenant has an expired residence permit and a 2021 OQTF (over 3 years). The landlord is worried.

Application pratique:

An OQTF over three years old can no longer justify detention. The tenant can stay but without a permit. Advise the landlord to check the situation and consider termination of the lease for legitimate grounds if the tenant is in an irregular situation.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide