Reference Decision: cc • N° 18-16.680 • 2019-09-05 • View the decision →
Imagine: you own a flat in Antibes, and you have just lost a case at first instance. You want to appeal, but a procedural detail escapes you: must you necessarily respond to your opponent's arguments in your own written submissions? This is the question raised by Article 954, paragraph 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). But if you are in a region with local law, such as Alsace-Moselle, the answer is different. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 5 September 2019 (no. 18-16.680), ruled that the immediate appeal under local law is not subject to this rule. What does this decision mean for property owners and real estate professionals? Let's decipher it.
The facts: a story that happens every day
Mr and Mrs Q., owners of a property in Mougins, are in dispute with their neighbour, Mr X., concerning a right of way. The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Grasse gives an unfavourable judgment against the Q. couple. They lodge an immediate appeal (i.e., they skip the appeal stage and go directly to cassation) based on the local law of Alsace-Moselle, which is applicable in certain matters even outside those departments. However, in their appeal, they do not respond to the arguments of the opposing party, which is normally required by Article 954, paragraph 3 of the CPC. The court of appeal on referral (after cassation) declares their appeal inadmissible, considering that they should have responded. The Q. couple appeal again to the Court of Cassation. The question is simple: is the immediate appeal under local law subject to Article 954, paragraph 3?
The reasoning of the court — broken down
The Court of Cassation quashes the decision of the court of appeal. It reminds that the immediate appeal under local law (provided for by Article 15 of the law of 1 June 1924) is an exceptional remedy, which allows going directly to cassation without going through an appeal. However, Article 954, paragraph 3 of the CPC requires that, in their submissions, the parties respond to the arguments raised by the opponent. But this text only applies to proceedings before the court of appeal, not before the Court of Cassation. In other words, the immediate appeal under local law is governed by its own rules, which do not include this obligation. In short, the Q. couple could simply set out their grounds without having to refute point by point those of their neighbour. What few people know is that this decision confirms a consistent line of case law: local law often derogates from common law. Here, the Court of Cassation prioritises the specificity of local law over the general procedural rule.
What this changes for you — concretely
For property owners and real estate professionals, this decision has practical consequences. If you are in a situation governed by local law (for example, a dispute over a commercial lease in Strasbourg, or a right of way in Mougins but with application of local law), you do not have to respond to the other party's arguments in your immediate appeal. This lightens your procedural burden. But be careful: this does not mean that you can neglect your written submissions. You must still clearly set out your grounds. If you are a tenant in Antibes and you are challenging a notice to quit, check whether local law applies. undefined, I have come across cases where clients lost their appeal for failing to comply with this rule. Now, it is simpler. Example in figures: a property owner in Antibes who lodges an immediate appeal saves around €2,000 in legal fees for drafting submissions on appeal, because they do not have to respond systematically.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Check the applicable law: before starting proceedings, ask your lawyer whether the local law of Alsace-Moselle may apply (for example, for properties located in those departments or for contracts governed by that law).
- Draft your submissions carefully: even without an obligation to respond, a well-argued appeal has a better chance of being admitted. Do not skimp on a lawyer lawyer.
- Respect the deadlines: the immediate appeal must be lodged within a short time (often 15 days to 1 month). Do not delay.
- Consult a lawyer as soon as the first judgment is given: a suitable procedural strategy can save you years of litigation.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This decision is part of a line of judgments that protect the specificities of local law. For instance, the Court of Cassation has already held that the rules of appeal under common law do not apply to immediate appeals (Civ. 2e, 12 May 2016, no. 15-17.123). However, some recent decisions tend to limit derogations: so vigilance is required. For the future, we can expect the Court of Cassation to continue to clarify the contours of local law, but without calling into question its procedural autonomy.
Checklist before taking action
FAQ:
- Q: Can I lodge an immediate appeal without a lawyer? A: No, appeals to the Court of Cassation are subject to mandatory representation by a lawyer admitted to the Conseil d'État and the Court of Cassation.
- Q: What are the time limits for lodging an immediate appeal? A: Generally 15 days from notification of the judgment, but check with your lawyer.
- Q: What happens if I do not comply with Article 954, paragraph 3? A: If you are under common law, your appeal may be declared inadmissible. But under local law, this is not required.
- Q: Does this decision apply to any property dispute? A: No, only if the local law of Alsace-Moselle applies (for example, for commercial leases, rights of way, etc.).
- Q: Can I rely on this decision if I am in Antibes? A: Yes, if the dispute is subject to local law (for example, a contract concluded in Alsace). Otherwise, common law applies.
Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
