Seniority and Sick Leave: The Bonus Cannot Be Reduced (Cass. 2018)
Droit-immobilier

Seniority and Sick Leave: The Bonus Cannot Be Reduced (Cass. 2018)

📅 Décision du 28 June 2018⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 4 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) has ruled that periods of suspension of the employment contract due to illness do not interrupt seniority for the calculation of the seniority bonus provided for by the hairdressing collective agreement. Employees retain their rights even when on sick leave.

Reference decision: cc • No. 16-28.511 • 2018-06-28 • View the decision →

In Andrézieux-Bouthéon, in the Loire department, a hairdresser employed for nearly ten years saw her seniority bonus reduced because she was off sick for several months. Like her, thousands of hairdressing employees are unaware that their collective agreement protects their seniority even in the event of absence. A question gnaws at many salon owners: can sick leave really be deducted from the calculation of seniority? The answer is no, and the French Supreme Court confirmed this on 28 June 2018.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mrs Y. works as a hairdresser in a salon owned by Mr X, a manager in Montbrison. After several years of service, she benefits from a seniority bonus provided for by Appendix No. 12 of the National Collective Agreement for Hairdressing. But in 2012, following several months of sick leave, Mr X decides not to take this period into account when calculating the seniority required for the bonus (5 full and consecutive years in the same establishment). He considers that the absence interrupts the required continuity.

Mrs Y. challenges this: she brings the case before the Saint-Étienne Employment Tribunal (conseil de prud'hommes), which rules in her favour. Mr X appeals. The Lyon Court of Appeal upholds the judgment. The case goes up to the French Supreme Court, which dismisses the manager's appeal. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the phrase: "seniority means a number of full and consecutive years in the same establishment". Should periods of suspension of the contract (illness, unpaid leave) be deducted?

The court's reasoning — broken down

The French Supreme Court relies on Article 1.8 of Appendix No. 12. It recalls that the collective agreement itself defines seniority as full and consecutive years in the same establishment. But it adds a general principle: periods of suspension of the employment contract (such as illness) do not interrupt seniority, unless there is an express provision to the contrary. Seniority means continuity of the contractual relationship, not physical presence.

The judges analyse the wording of the agreement: nowhere does it say that sick leave must be deducted. On the contrary, the phrase "full and consecutive years" aims to avoid counting voluntary absences (such as extended unpaid leave). But illness is involuntary. The court rejects Mr X's argument that continuity is broken by absence. This is a confirmation of consistent case law: since a 2004 decision, the French Supreme Court has considered that seniority is calculated in calendar time, unless the text states otherwise.

The reasoning is simple: if the agreement had intended to exclude illness, it would have said so. Since it does not, the employee retains their seniority. The judges emphasise the protective purpose of the seniority bonus, which rewards loyalty to the company, not actual presence.

What this changes for you — concretely

For hairdressing employees: you can accumulate your seniority bonus even after sick leave. If your employer reduces it, you can claim back pay. Example: in Montbrison, a hairdresser with 7 years' seniority (including 6 months of sick leave) must receive the bonus corresponding to 7 years, not 6.5 years.

For hairdressing salon employers: you must check your calculation method. If you deduct sick leave, you risk litigation and back pay for the last 3 years (limitation period). It is better to regularise immediately. The decision also applies to other collective agreements that use the same wording.

For salon owners (often managers): beware of internal clauses that attempt to circumvent this rule. They would be considered abusive. If you are in this situation, you must recalculate your employees' seniority including periods of suspension.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Consult the applicable collective agreement: check the exact wording on seniority. If it does not specify that illness interrupts seniority, apply the rule of continuity.
  • Calculate seniority in calendar years: add up all periods during which the employment contract exists, even if suspended. A monthly tracking table will prevent errors.
  • Train your payroll manager: a misinterpretation can be costly. If in doubt, seek advice from a lawyer specialising in employment law.
  • Include a clear clause in the employment contract: if you wish to exclude certain absences, do so expressly and in accordance with the collective agreement. But know that illness cannot be excluded without a contractual provision.

Further details: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a protective trend by the French Supreme Court. Already in 2004 (decision No. 02-45.179), it had ruled that strike periods do not interrupt seniority. In 2012 (No. 10-28.244), it extended this principle to parental leave. Here, it confirms it for illness.

Conversely, some collective agreements expressly provide that only periods of actual work count. For example, the hotel-café-restaurant agreement excludes sick leave of more than one year. But in the absence of a clause, the rule is continuity. Courts are increasingly vigilant about protecting employees' rights, especially in precarious sectors like hairdressing.

For the future, we can expect the French Supreme Court to extend this reasoning to other seniority-related bonuses (holiday bonus, etc.). Employers must anticipate.

What you absolutely need to remember

FAQ

  • Does sick leave interrupt seniority for the bonus? No, unless there is a very clear contrary provision in the collective agreement. The duration of the illness counts towards seniority.
  • Can I claim a bonus back-pay if my employer deducted my sick leave? Yes, within the 3-year limitation period. Gather your payslips and employment contract.
  • Does this rule apply to all collective agreements? No, each agreement may have its own rules. Check yours.
  • What should I do if my employer refuses to apply this decision? Bring the case before the employment tribunal. You can also request mediation.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Un arrêt maladie interrompt-il l'ancienneté pour le calcul de la prime d'ancienneté dans la coiffure ?

Non, selon la Cour de cassation (28 juin 2018), les périodes de suspension du contrat de travail pour maladie ne déduisent pas l'ancienneté, sauf disposition contraire expresse de la convention collective.

Puis-je réclamer un rappel de prime d'ancienneté si mon employeur a déduit mes arrêts maladie ?

Oui, vous pouvez réclamer un rappel de salaire sur les 3 dernières années. Rassemblez vos bulletins de paie et saisissez le conseil de prud'hommes.

Cette règle s'applique-t-elle à toutes les conventions collectives ?

Non, chaque convention peut prévoir ses propres règles. Vérifiez les termes exacts de votre convention collective. En l'absence de clause contraire, la maladie ne réduit pas l'ancienneté.

Que faire si mon employeur refuse d'appliquer cette jurisprudence ?

Vous pouvez engager une action prud'homale. Une consultation avec un avocat spécialisé peut vous aider à évaluer vos chances et les démarches.

Quels sont les risques pour un employeur qui ne respecte pas cette règle ?

L'employeur s'expose à un rappel de salaire, des dommages-intérêts et une éventuelle condamnation pour travail dissimulé si les primes ont été omises de manière répétée.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 16-28.511
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 28 juin 2018

Mots-clés

prime d'anciennetéarrêt maladieconvention collective coiffureCour de cassation 2018droit du travail

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Hairdresser employee in Montbrison on sick leave

Mrs A., a hairdresser for 6 years, was off sick for 4 months. Her employer reduces her seniority bonus from 6 to 5.5 years.

Application pratique:

Mrs A. can demand full payment of the bonus for 6 years of seniority. She must send a registered letter to her employer, then bring the case before the Saint-Étienne Employment Tribunal if necessary.

2

Salon manager in Andrézieux-Bouthéon faced with a claim

An employer receives a claim for bonus back-pay from an employee who had several sick leaves. He thought seniority was suspended.

Application pratique:

The employer must regularise the bonus retroactively (max 3 years). He can negotiate a payment schedule. In future, he must include all periods of suspension in the calculation of seniority.

3

Salon owner in Loire wanting to secure practices

A salon manager in Saint-Étienne wants to avoid any dispute. He uses payroll software that automatically deducts sick leave.

Application pratique:

He must configure the software not to deduct sick leave. He can also have his practices audited by a lawyer. Quick compliance avoids costly back-pay.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide