Aller au contenu principal
Termination of commercial lease and judicial liquidation: what can the juge-commissaire do?
Droit-immobilier

Termination of commercial lease and judicial liquidation: what can the juge-commissaire do?

📅 Décision du 18 May 2022⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court clarifies that the juge-commissaire, when seized of a request for a declaration of automatic termination of a lease after judicial liquidation, cannot grant payment delays. Only the three-month period provided by Article R. 641-21 of the Commercial Code is enforceable against the landlord.

Reference decision: cc • No. 20-22.164 • 2022-05-18 • View the decision →

Imagine: you own a commercial premises in Saintes, leased to a company that has just been placed into judicial liquidation. The tenant continues to occupy the premises but no longer pays the post-judgment rents. You want to recover your property, but the liquidator opposes you with a request for time. How far can the judge go? The French Supreme Court ruled on 18 May 2022: the juge-commissaire, seized under Article L. 641-12, 3° of the Commercial Code, cannot grant any payment delays, neither under general law (Article 1343-5 of the Civil Code) nor under the statutory regime for commercial leases (Article L. 145-41 of the Commercial Code). Only a three-month period is enforceable against the landlord, that of Article R. 641-21 of the Commercial Code. This decision clarifies the powers of the juge-commissaire and protects landlords against abusive suspensions. But what exactly does this change for you?

The facts: a story like many others

The company Carla, tenant of a commercial premises in Aytré, was placed into judicial liquidation on 1 March 2018. The landlord, the owning SCI, sent a formal notice to the liquidator to pay the post-judgment rents, which had remained unpaid since February 2018. The liquidator did not pay. The landlord then applied to the juge-commissaire of the Commercial Court of La Rochelle for a declaration of automatic termination of the lease, under Article R. 641-21 of the Commercial Code. The juge-commissaire declared the termination, but the liquidator appealed, arguing that the judge should have granted payment delays. The Poitiers Court of Appeal upheld the termination, and the liquidator appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal: the juge-commissaire has no power to grant delays. The special procedure under Article L. 641-12, 3° is exclusive.

The reasoning of the court — broken down

The Supreme Court distinguishes between two procedures: on the one hand, the action for a declaration of automatic termination of the lease for non-payment of post-judgment rents, based on Article L. 641-12, 3° of the Commercial Code (which allows the landlord to request the juge-commissaire to declare the automatic termination of the lease if the rents are not paid within three months of a formal notice); on the other hand, the action for enforcement of the general law forfeiture clause, based on Article L. 145-41 of the Commercial Code (which governs commercial leases and allows the court to grant payment delays to suspend the termination). The Court recalls that the first procedure is subject to specific conditions and is distinct from the second. Consequently, the juge-commissaire cannot apply Article L. 145-41 (which provides for delays) nor Article 1343-5 of the Civil Code (general grace periods). The only period enforceable against the landlord is the three-month period provided by Article R. 641-21, during which the landlord cannot act. In other words, once the formal notice has been sent, the liquidator has three months to pay; after that period, the juge-commissaire must declare the termination without being able to grant additional delays. What few people know is that the juge-commissaire has no discretion: if the conditions are met (lease in force, judicial liquidation, unpaid post-judgment rents, unsuccessful three-month formal notice), he must declare the termination. He cannot, for example, grant a six-month payment schedule.

What this changes for you — concretely

For the landlord: you can now act more quickly. As soon as your tenant is in judicial liquidation and does not pay post-judgment rents, send a formal notice by bailiff's deed to the liquidator. Wait three months, then apply to the juge-commissaire. He will declare the termination, and you can recover your premises. Concrete example: in Saintes, a 100 sqm premises rented for €1,500 per month. If the tenant does not pay for three months, you lose €4,500, but you recover the premises. Without this decision, the judge could have granted six months' delays, causing you to lose an additional €9,000. For the tenant (or liquidator): you cannot hope for payment delays beyond three months. If you want to keep the lease, you must pay within three months of the formal notice. For the purchaser of the business or premises: be vigilant: if the tenant is in liquidation, the lease can be terminated quickly. Check that post-judgment rents are up to date.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • For the landlord: as soon as a judicial liquidation is opened, ask the liquidator to confirm in writing that he intends to continue the lease. In case of silence, send a formal notice to pay the rents within three months.
  • For the tenant: if you are in judicial liquidation and want to keep the lease, pay post-judgment rents as soon as you receive the formal notice. Do not rely on court delays.
  • For both parties: keep all payment receipts and written exchanges carefully. Proof of the formal notice is crucial.
  • For any professional: anticipate by including a standard forfeiture clause in the lease, but know that in judicial liquidation, the special procedure prevails.

This decision confirms earlier case law (Civ. 3e, 15 November 2018, No. 17-25.622) which had already excluded the application of Article L. 145-41 in the context of judicial liquidation. The Supreme Court goes further by also excluding Article 1343-5 of the Civil Code. The trend is therefore clear: the juge-commissaire is a judge with limited powers, and the legislator intended to protect the landlord by accelerating lease termination after liquidation. undefined, I have encountered cases where liquidators tried to drag things out by requesting delays; this decision discourages them. Note, however, that this solution only applies to post-judgment rents. For pre-judgment rents, general law applies.

Checklist before acting

  • Is the tenant in judicial liquidation? Check the opening judgment at the registry of the commercial court.
  • Are the unpaid rents post-judgment? Yes? You are within the scope of Article L. 641-12, 3°.
  • Have you sent a formal notice by bailiff's deed or registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt? This is mandatory. Wait three months.
  • Has the liquidator paid within three months? No? Apply to the juge-commissaire for a declaration of termination.
  • Can the juge-commissaire grant delays? No, he must declare the termination.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la résiliation de plein droit du bail en liquidation judiciaire ?

C'est une procédure spéciale qui permet au bailleur de demander au juge-commissaire de constater que le bail est résilié automatiquement, sans avoir à passer par un tribunal classique, lorsque le locataire en liquidation judiciaire ne paie pas les loyers postérieurs au jugement dans les trois mois suivant une mise en demeure.

Puis-je obtenir des délais de paiement si je suis locataire en liquidation judiciaire ?

Non, le juge-commissaire ne peut pas vous accorder de délais. Vous devez payer les loyers dans les trois mois suivant la mise en demeure, sinon le bail sera résilié.

Quel délai ai-je pour payer après la mise en demeure ?

Vous disposez de trois mois à compter de la mise en demeure. Passé ce délai, le bailleur peut saisir le juge-commissaire pour faire constater la résiliation.

Que faire si le liquidateur ne paie pas les loyers ?

En tant que bailleur, vous devez envoyer une mise en demeure par acte d'huissier ou lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception. Si le paiement n'intervient pas dans les trois mois, saisissez le juge-commissaire.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle aux loyers antérieurs au jugement de liquidation ?

Non, elle ne concerne que les loyers postérieurs. Pour les loyers antérieurs, vous devez déclarer votre créance au passif de la liquidation.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 20-22.164
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 mai 2022

Mots-clés

bail commercialliquidation judiciairerésiliation de plein droitjuge-commissairedélais de paiement

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner of premises in Saintes: tenant in liquidation not paying

Mr. Dupont rents a commercial premises in Saintes to a restaurant company placed into judicial liquidation in January 2023. Since then, the tenant occupies the premises without paying the rent of €2,000 per month. Mr. Dupont sends a formal notice to the liquidator in February 2023, with no response.

Application pratique:

Mr. Dupont must wait three months from the formal notice (i.e., May 2023), then apply to the juge-commissaire of the Commercial Court of La Rochelle for a declaration of termination. The judge will not grant any delays, and Mr. Dupont will be able to recover his premises and re-let quickly.

2

Tenant in Aytré: wants to keep the lease despite liquidation

The company Bat'art, tenant of a workshop in Aytré, is in judicial liquidation. The manager wishes to continue the activity and keep the lease. The landlord has sent a formal notice to pay the rents of €1,500 per month.

Application pratique:

The liquidator must pay the arrears within three months of the formal notice. If he does not, the lease will be terminated. To avoid this, the manager can ask the liquidator to prioritise this payment or negotiate an amicable agreement with the landlord before the judge is seized.

3

Purchaser of a business in La Rochelle: check the lease

Ms. Martin is considering buying a bakery business in La Rochelle. The seller is in judicial liquidation, but the lease is still in force. She fears the lease may be terminated.

Application pratique:

Before buying, Ms. Martin must check that the post-judgment rents are up to date. If there are arrears, the lease risks termination. She can ask the liquidator to provide a certificate of payment or require that the rents be paid before the sale.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide