Aller au contenu principal
SCI and foreign partner: taxation of profits and tax treaty
Droit-immobilier

SCI and foreign partner: taxation of profits and tax treaty

📅 Décision du 12 January 2022⚖️ Cour de cassation com.👁️ 4 vues📖 4 min de lecture

<p>This article analyses the taxation of profits of a French property investment company (SCI) whose partner is foreign, in light of the judgment of the Court of Cassation of 12 January 2022. It deciphers the tax issues, international treaties and the role of the specialised lawyer.</p>

Case Reference: Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 12 January 2022, No. 20-21.543

SCI and Foreign Partner: A Complex Tax Framework

The acquisition of real estate in France through a French Civil Real Estate Company (SCI) is a common practice for foreign investors. However, the taxation applicable to profits distributed to a non-resident partner raises delicate issues, particularly in the presence of an international tax treaty. The judgment handed down by the Court of Cassation on 12 January 2022 (No. 20-21.543) provides essential clarification on the treatment of income distributed by an SCI to a foreign partner and its interaction with tax treaties.

The Facts and the Decision of the Court of Cassation

Context of the Case

In this case, a French SCI owned a building and had distributed profits to its partner, a company incorporated under foreign law (established in a Member State of the European Union). The French tax authorities subjected these distributions to the withholding tax provided for in Article 119 bis of the French General Tax Code (CGI), on the grounds that the distributed profits were not taxable in the hands of the SCI (the latter being fiscally transparent). The foreign partner contested this withholding tax by invoking the applicable Franco-foreign tax treaty.

Solution Adopted

The Court of Cassation held that, in order to determine whether the withholding tax is due, the distributed income must first be classified according to the tax treaty. If the treaty allocates the right to tax this income to the partner's State of residence (and not to France), the French withholding tax is not applicable. In the present case, the Court overturned the Court of Appeal's judgment which had not verified whether the tax treaty excluded taxation in France. This decision confirms the principle of the primacy of international treaties over domestic law (Article 55 of the Constitution).

The Fiscal Transparency of the SCI

Under French law, the SCI is fiscally transparent: its profits are taxed directly in the hands of the partners, in proportion to their shares (Article 8 of the CGI). Consequently, the distributed profits are not deducted from the company's results and are considered income received by the partners. For a foreign partner, this income is subject to a withholding tax of 25% (Article 119 bis 2 of the CGI), unless a tax treaty applies.

The Impact of Tax Treaties

Tax treaties concluded by France generally provide that dividends (or similar income) distributed by a French company to a partner resident in the other State are taxable in that State, with a limited withholding tax rate (often 15% or 0% for certain shareholdings). However, the classification of SCI distributions may be disputed: are they dividends or real estate income? In its judgment, the Court of Cassation emphasises the need to classify the income according to the treaty, taking into account the nature of the company and the origin of the profits. If the treaty assimilates SCI distributions to real estate income, taxation may revert to the State where the property is situated (France).

The Scope of the Judgment of 12 January 2022

This decision serves as a reminder that the judge must verify, on a concrete basis, whether the tax treaty precludes the application of the withholding tax. It highlights the importance of treaty analysis and the classification of income. For practitioners, it underscores the necessity of correctly identifying the type of income distributed (dividends, interest, real estate income) and consulting the applicable treaty.

Practical Advice for the Foreign Partner

Before the Acquisition

  • Choose the appropriate structure: The SCI is not always the most advantageous for a foreigner. A company subject to corporate income tax (IS) may sometimes offer better optimisation.
  • Analyse the tax treaty: Verify the provisions of the treaty between France and the partner's country of residence concerning real estate income and dividends.
  • Anticipate exit taxation: In the event of a transfer of shares or the building, capital gains may be taxable in France.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

During the Holding Period

  • Declare the income: The foreign partner must declare their share of the profits in France, even if the treaty provides for an exemption.
  • Claim the benefit of the treaty: To avoid the withholding tax, they must provide the SCI with a certificate of residence.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 20-21.543
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation com.
  • Date de décision: 12 janvier 2022

Mots-clés

étrangernon-résidentSCIfiscalité immobilièreconvention fiscale
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide