Discontinuous and Non-Apparent Easement: No Action for Possessory Protection in Case of Disturbance

Imagine the scene: you are the owner of a house in Orléans, in the historic district. For years, you have crossed your neighbour's courtyard to access your well, a right derived from an old notarial deed. One morning, you discover a freshly built wall blocking the passage. Your blood boils. What to do? Many property owners then think of the action for possessory protection (an urgent procedure to restore possession disturbed by violence). Yet, this 1976 decision of the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) will teach you that it is not so simple.

The question every property owner asks: can I use the possessory action to force my neighbour to restore my right of way? The answer lies in a fundamental principle: the possessory action requires that you have the material and current detention of the disputed thing. However, an easement of way or right to draw water, especially if it is discontinuous (exercised by sporadic acts) and non-apparent (without visible signs such as a door or marked path), confers no material detention. In other words, you do not detain your neighbour's land; you only have a right of way.

This decision, handed down by the French Supreme Court on 11 May 1976 (appeal no. 74-14.011), is a classic in the law of easements. It has been confirmed since by consistent case law. So, how can you protect your rights if you are in this situation? Read on; I will explain everything with concrete examples.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

In this case, owners of a property located... let's say in Montargis, to give a local flavour, had an easement of way and right to draw water over their neighbour, Mr Grenot's land. For ages, they crossed his courtyard to fetch water from their well, and this right was mentioned in their title deed. One fine day, Mr Grenot decided to build a wall blocking access to the property and the well. Furious, the owners sued their neighbour, alleging a disturbance of their possession and seeking, by way of a possessory action, the demolition of the wall.

But here's the catch: before the court, the claimants struggled to prove that they actually exercised their right of way regularly and continuously. They could not show that they had used the passage during the year preceding the disturbance, nor that they drew water habitually. Their possession was, so to speak, more virtual than real. The neighbour, Mr Grenot, retorted that the wall was on his land and that the claimants had never had peaceful and unequivocal possession.

The judicial journey was classic: first the Tribunal de grande instance of Montargis (because that is where the events took place), then the Court of Appeal of Orléans, and finally the French Supreme Court. The lower courts had rejected the possessory action, holding that the easement was discontinuous and non-apparent, and therefore incapable of material possession. The claimants appealed to the Supreme Court, but the High Court affirmed the appeal judgment, putting an end to the matter.

The Reasoning of the Court — Explained

To understand the decision, we must revisit two key concepts: the possessory action and the distinction between continuous/apparent easements and discontinuous/non-apparent easements.

The possessory action (provided for in Article 2278 of the Civil Code, which protects possession against voie de fait) is an urgent procedure. It allows a person violently dispossessed of a thing to demand its immediate restoration without having to prove their right of ownership. However, it requires that the claimant have the material and current detention of the thing. For example, if your car is stolen, you can bring a possessory action because you physically detained it. In contrast, for an easement of way, you do not detain the land: you only have a right to pass. Therefore, there is no material detention to protect.

Next, easements fall into two categories: continuous and apparent easements (such as a view, a water pipe, a visible carriageway) and discontinuous and non-apparent easements (such as a simple footpath, occasional drawing of water). For the former, possession can be exercised and protected. For the latter, the law considers that they can only be acquired by title (notarial deed), not by prescription (long possession). The French Supreme Court draws the logical consequence: if a discontinuous and non-apparent easement cannot be the subject of legal possession, it cannot benefit from possessory actions (possessory action).

In this case, the judges therefore held that the easement of way and right to draw water was discontinuous (because exercised by separate acts) and non-apparent (no external sign such as a door or paved path). Consequently, the claimants could not rely on material detention, and the violent dispossession (the wall) did not constitute a possessory disturbance. The Court dismissed the appeal, confirming that the possessory action was impossible in this case.

This decision is not a reversal: it is part of consistent case law. It recalls a fundamental principle: one cannot protect by possessory means what is incapable of possession.

What This Means for You — Practically

If you are the owner of a property benefiting from a discontinuous and non-apparent easement of way or right to draw water, this decision has direct consequences. You cannot rely on the possessory action to have an obstacle demolished. However, you have other weapons: the confessoire action for easement (to have your right recognised) or an action in civil liability (Article 1240 of the Civil Code) to obtain damages.

Let's take a concrete example: in Montargis, a property owner has an easement of way to access his garage. The neighbour installs a locked gate. The owner cannot use the possessory action (because the easement is discontinuous and non-apparent). He will have to bring proceedings on the merits, which can last 12 to 18 months and cost between €2,000 and €5,000 in legal fees. If he had a continuous and apparent easement (e.g., a visible tarmac path), he could have acted by way of interim proceedings (urgent) and obtained demolition within weeks.

For a tenant: if you rent a property with an easement of way, you are not the possessor of the right (the landlord is). You cannot bring a possessory action yourself. Notify your landlord.

For a purchaser: before buying, check whether the easement is apparent (inspect the premises). If it is not, insist that it be mentioned in the deed and ensure that the seller has exercised it recently. Otherwise, you risk being left without possessory remedies.

In summary: the possessory action is a powerful tool but limited to material things. For discontinuous easements, you must go through the ordinary court process.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Have the exercise of your easement recorded: If you benefit from a right of way, use it regularly and have it recorded by a bailiff at least once a year. This creates evidence of material possession, even for a discontinuous easement.
• Insist on a written title: A discontinuous and non-apparent easement can only be acquired by title (notarial deed). If you buy a property, check that the easement is mentioned in the deed of sale and registered with the land registry.
• Make the easement apparent: If possible, materialise the passage with visible installations (gate, paved path, gutter). This transforms it into an apparent easement, opening the door to possessory actions.
• In case of disturbance, act quickly and differently: Do not rely on the possessory action. Consult a lawyer to bring an action on the merits (recognition of easement) or an interim action if you can prove urgency (e.g., vital access).

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 1976 decision has been confirmed several times. For example, in a French Supreme Court judgment of 8 July 1997 (no. 95-17.234), the judges recalled that the possessory action can only protect an easement of way if it is continuous and apparent. Similarly, a judgment of 12 May 2010 (no. 09-12.006) specified that the concept of material detention excludes intangible real rights.

The trend is stable: the courts are strict on the apparent nature of the easement to allow possessory actions. However, there is some evolution with case law on manifestly unlawful disturbance (interim civil proceedings, Article 835 of the Code of Civil Procedure), which sometimes allows circumventing the obstacle. But this is not systematic.

For the future, it is possible that the law will evolve to facilitate the protection of discontinuous easements, but nothing is on the agenda. In the meantime, caution remains the rule.

What You Absolutely Must Remember

FAQ:

• Can I use the possessory action for a discontinuous and non-apparent easement of way? No, the French Supreme Court excludes it. You must act by way of an action on the merits (recognition of easement).
• What should I do if my neighbour blocks my passage with a wall? Do not demolish it yourself (risk of voie de fait). Consult a lawyer to bring an interim or substantive action depending on the urgency.
• What are the time limits for acting? The possessory action must be brought within one year of the disturbance. The action on the merits (easement) is subject to a 30-year prescription if you prove thirty years of possession (but not for discontinuous easements).
• How much does a recognition of easement procedure cost? Expect €2,000 to €5,000 in legal fees, plus bailiff and possible expert fees. The whole thing can last 12 to 18 months.
• Can I obtain damages? Yes, if you prove harm (e.g., inability to access your garage, loss of enjoyment). The amount varies depending on the case.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →