Aller au contenu principal
Living Space in a Shared Ownership Property: Must a Converted Cellar Be Measured?
Droit-immobilier

Living Space in a Shared Ownership Property: Must a Converted Cellar Be Measured?

📅 Décision du 02 October 2013⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled that a basement room, even if described as a cellar in the co-ownership regulations, must be included in the calculation of the private area if it has been converted into a storage room. This decision protects the buyer against errors in area and clarifies the seller's obligations.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 12-21.918 • 2013-10-02 • View the decision →

You have just purchased a flat in Biscarrosse, with a cellar in the basement. The seller indicated an area of 70 m², but after the sale, you realise that the cellar, although described as such in the deed, has been fitted out as a storage room and measures 10 m². Should it be included in the calculation of the area? This apparently technical question has direct financial consequences: every square metre counts, especially when the price per m² in the Landes region is close to €3,000.

Article 46 of the Law of 10 July 1965 requires that the area of the private part of a co-ownership unit be stated in the sale deed. But what happens if a room, described as a cellar in the co-ownership regulations, is in fact a habitable storage room? The Court of Cassation ruled on 2 October 2013: the trial judges have the power to independently assess the actual nature of the room, regardless of its contractual description. In short, if the cellar has become a storage room, it counts towards the area.

This decision is a breath of fresh air for wronged buyers, but a wake-up call for sellers and their notaries. We will see how this practical case, which could have taken place in Mimizan, ended up before the Supreme Court, and what you should take away from it for your property transactions.

The Facts: An Everyday Story

SCI Sacre (the company) purchased, by notarised deed dated 18 May 2005, a co-ownership unit from the X heirs. The sale deed and the co-ownership regulations stated that the unit included a cellar in the basement. However, after the sale, SCI discovered that this basement room was no longer a cellar: it had been converted into a storage room, with direct access and fittings. The actual area of the private part was therefore different from that declared.

SCI then sued the sellers for a reduction in price on the basis of Article 46 of the Law of 10 July 1965 (which provides for an action for reduction of the price if the area is more than 5% less than that stated). The sellers resisted, arguing that the cellar, even if converted, should be excluded from the calculation of the area because it was described as a cellar in the contractual documents.

The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of SCI, holding that the description as a cellar was not decisive: what matters is the physical reality of the room. The sellers then appealed to the Court of Cassation, but the Court dismissed their argument, upholding the Court of Appeal's decision. In other words, the trial judges independently found that the room was a storage room, not a cellar, and concluded that it should be included in the area. What few people know is that this decision is part of a jurisprudential trend that protects the buyer, prioritising reality over contractual statements.

The Court's Reasoning — Explained

The Court of Cassation relied on Article 46 of the Law of 10 July 1965, which provides: 'Any unilateral promise to sell or buy, any contract that concludes or records the sale of a unit or part of a unit must state the area of the private part of that unit or part of a unit.' In clear terms, the seller must indicate the actual area of the private part, i.e., the rooms used exclusively by the co-owner, excluding common parts.

The sellers argued that the cellar was excluded from the area because the co-ownership regulations and the sale deed described it as a cellar. But the Court of Cassation recalled that the contractual description is not absolute: the trial judges independently assess the nature of the room based on its physical characteristics. In this case, the Court of Appeal had found that the room was no longer a cellar (dark, damp storage space) but a storage room (fitted, accessible). Therefore, it formed part of the private part and had to be measured.

Note, however, that this solution is not a departure from precedent, but a confirmation of earlier case law (Civ. 3e, 9 June 2010, No. 09-13.439). The Court of Cassation leaves a margin of appreciation to the trial judges, which can create uncertainties. But overall, the trend is clear: reality prevails over written statements. undefined that if a 'cellar' is converted into a bedroom, office or storage room, it must be included in the stated area.

What This Means for You — in Practical Terms

For the buyer: You have just bought a flat in Mont-de-Marsan. The deed states 80 m², but after the sale, you discover that the basement, described as a cellar, is actually a fitted room of 15 m². If the actual area is more than 5% less than that stated, you can demand a reduction in price. For example, if the price per m² is €2,500, 15 m² represents €37,500. You can claim this amount from the seller.

For the seller: Be careful not to underestimate the area. If you have converted a cellar into a storage room without mentioning it, you risk an action for reduction in price. Before selling, have the area measured by a professional (diagnostician) and check the exact description of each room. undefined, I have come across cases where the seller had to repay several thousand euros for a simple error in description.

For the co-owner: If you plan to convert a cellar into a living space, be aware that this may alter the co-ownership shares (proportionate share in the common parts) and require the approval of the general meeting. Furthermore, if the conversion is not declared, you may be required to restore the premises to their original state.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Have a Carrez measurement carried out by a certified professional before the sale. This document, mandatory for units over 8 m², protects you in case of a dispute. In Biscarrosse, the cost of a measurement is around €150, a trivial sum compared to a potential dispute.
  • Check the description of rooms in the co-ownership regulations. If a cellar has been converted, have the regulations amended by the general meeting to avoid any ambiguity. Otherwise, the seller assumes the risk.
  • When buying, insist on a warranty clause for the area. Even though the law protects the buyer, a contractual clause can strengthen your rights and facilitate an amicable procedure.
  • Keep all documents relating to the condition of the property. Photos, plans, surveys: they will be useful in case of a dispute to prove the actual nature of the room at the time of sale.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This decision is part of a line of cases protecting the buyer. Already in 2010 (Civ. 3e, 9 June 2010, No. 09-13.439), the Court of Cassation had ruled that converted attics must be included in the area, even if described as 'loft' in the regulations. More recently, in 2018 (Civ. 3e, 14 June 2018, No. 17-18.392), it extended this logic to terraces and balconies, provided they are enclosed and covered.

The trend is therefore towards a broad interpretation of the concept of 'private part': any space used exclusively by the co-owner, regardless of its name in the documents, must be measured. However, cellars strictly used for storage without any fittings remain excluded. The boundary can be blurred, hence the importance of an accurate survey.

For the future, we can expect the courts to continue to prioritise physical reality over formal descriptions. Notaries and estate agents must therefore be extra vigilant when drafting deeds.

What You Absolutely Must Remember

FAQ:

Q: Is a converted cellar always excluded from the Carrez area?
R: No, if it is fitted and accessible, it must be included. The description in the deed does not bind the judges.

Q: Can I claim a reduction in price if the stated area is less than the actual area?
R: Yes, if the difference is more than 5% of the stated area. The action is subject to a 5-year limitation period from the sale.

Q: How much does a court action for incorrect area cost?
R: Legal fees and expert costs can reach €3,000 to €5,000, but they are often recoverable if you win. A preliminary 30-minute consultation (€45) may save you from an unnecessary trial.

Q: What should I do if I am a seller and have a converted cellar?
R: Describe it as a 'storage room' in the deed and have it measured. This will avoid any subsequent dispute.

Q: Does this case law apply to leases?
R: Indirectly, because the habitable area (Boutin law) excludes cellars. But if the lease mentions an area including a converted cellar, the tenant may challenge it.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat copropriété & ASL  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Une cave transformée en réserve est-elle toujours exclue de la surface Carrez ?

Non, si elle est aménagée et accessible, elle doit être incluse dans la superficie de la partie privative, même si le règlement de copropriété la qualifie de cave. La Cour de cassation a jugé que les juges du fond apprécient souverainement la nature réelle du local.

Puis-je demander une réduction de prix si la surface annoncée est inférieure ?

Oui, si l'écart est supérieur à 5 % de la superficie mentionnée dans l'acte de vente. L'action en diminution du prix est fondée sur l'article 46 de la loi du 10 juillet 1965 et se prescrit par cinq ans à compter de la vente.

Combien coûte une action en justice pour surface erronée ?

Les frais d'avocat et d'expertise peuvent varier entre 3 000 et 5 000 €, mais ils sont souvent récupérables si vous gagnez. Une consultation préalable de 30 minutes à 45 € peut vous aider à évaluer vos chances et éviter un procès inutile.

Que faire si je suis vendeur et que j'ai une cave transformée ?

Mentionnez-la comme 'réserve' dans l'acte de vente et faites-la mesurer par un professionnel certifié. Vous éviterez ainsi toute contestation ultérieure sur la superficie.

Cette jurisprudence s'applique-t-elle aux locations ?

Indirectement. La surface habitable (loi Boutin) exclut les caves, mais si le bail mentionne une surface incluant une cave transformée, le locataire peut contester. Il est recommandé de distinguer clairement les pièces dans le contrat de location.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 12-21.918
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 02 octobre 2013

Mots-clés

surface Carrezcave transforméecopropriétéloi 10 juillet 1965réduction de prixBiscarrosseMimizanMont-de-Marsanlitige immobilieravocat immobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Buyer in Biscarrosse discovers a converted cellar not counted

You buy a 70 m² flat in Biscarrosse. The deed mentions a 10 m² cellar in the basement. After the sale, you find that this cellar has been converted into a storage room with electricity and heating. You hire a surveyor who measures 80 m² of private area. The seller had thus underestimated the area by 10 m².

Application pratique:

You can bring an action for reduction of the price under Article 46. Calculate the difference: if the price per m² is €3,000, you can claim €30,000. Consult a specialist lawyer to initiate proceedings before the 5-year limitation period expires.

2

Seller in Mimizan risks a dispute for undeclared cellar conversion

You are selling your house in Mimizan. The basement contains an old cellar that you converted into a workshop 10 years ago. You describe it as a 'cellar' in the deed. After the sale, the buyer discovers the conversion and sues you for reduction of price due to missing area.

Application pratique:

You risk having to repay the difference in price. To avoid this, before the sale, have the area measured by a professional and describe the room as 'storage room' in the deed. If the dispute has already begun, try an amicable settlement to avoid legal costs.

3

Co-owner in Mont-de-Marsan wishes to convert their cellar

You are a co-owner in Mont-de-Marsan and want to convert your cellar into a guest room. You request permission from the general meeting, but some co-owners object because it would alter the co-ownership shares.

Application pratique:

Before undertaking any work, check the co-ownership regulations and obtain approval from the general meeting (simple or absolute majority depending on the case). If permission is refused, you can challenge it in court, but be aware that unauthorised conversion may result in an order to restore the premises.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide