Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

A company that manufactures

📅 Décision du 17 January 2002⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 2 min de lecture

A company that manufactures frozen products in all seasons with only a periodic increase in production does not have a seasonal activity and must pay to employees hired under fixed-term contracts the precariousness allowance provided for in Article L. 122-3-4 of the Labour Code, which is sufficient to render payable the contributions collected in this respect by URSSAF. Consequently, the judgment which annulled the reassessment carried out by that body on the grounds that the allowance was not due and that only the employees concerned could rely on non-payment must be censured.

Reference decision: cc • N° 00-14.709 • 2002-01-17 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A company that manufactures frozen products in all seasons with only a periodic increase in production does not have a seasonal activity and must pay to employees hired under fixed-term contracts the precariousness allowance provided for in Article L. 122-3-4 of the Labour Code, which is sufficient to render payable the contributions collected in this respect by URSSAF. Consequently, the judgment which annulled the reassessment carried out by that body on the grounds that the allowance was not due and that only the employees concerned could rely on non-payment must be censured.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 00-14.709
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 17 janvier 2002

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide