Usufruct of the Surviving Spouse: Beware of the Date of Conversion into Capital
Droit-immobilier

Usufruct of the Surviving Spouse: Beware of the Date of Conversion into Capital

📅 Décision du 10 May 1989⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 4 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that the value of the usufruct to be converted into full ownership must be assessed at the date closest to the conversion, not at the date of death. A crucial decision for surviving spouses and heirs.

Reference decision: cc • No. 86-17.766 • 1989-05-10 • View decision →

Imagine: you have just lost your wife in Mayenne, and you discover that her marriage contract allows you to convert your usufruct (right to use property and receive its income) into full ownership. Except that the value of this usufruct, estimated at the date of death, is much lower than what it would be today. Result: you lose thousands of euros. This is the kind of conflict that regularly pits surviving spouses against heirs. Should the usufruct be valued at the date of death or at the date of conversion? The Court of Cassation ruled in a decision of 10 May 1989. And its answer changes everything.

This question, which seems technical, has very concrete consequences for your assets. If you are a property owner in Évron, or elsewhere in France, and you are affected by a succession, this decision directly concerns you. The Court of Cassation reminds that the conversion of the usufruct into capital must be valued at the date closest to its implementation, and not at an earlier fixed date. Why? Because the usufruct is a life interest (lasting for the life of the usufructuary): its value depends on the life expectancy of the surviving spouse, which changes over time.

In this article, we will analyse this decision, understand the reasoning of the judges, and above all see what it means for you, whether you are a surviving spouse, heir or property professional.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr Auguste X, a property owner in Mayenne, is married under the regime of universal community (all assets are common) with a gift to the last survivor (the surviving spouse receives part of the deceased's assets). His wife dies leaving children from a first marriage. According to the marriage contract, Mr X is entitled to half of the estate in usufruct. But the children wish to recover full ownership of the assets. To do this, they offer to pay Mr X a capital sum equivalent to the value of his usufruct. This is called the conversion of the usufruct into capital.

The problem: at what date should this usufruct be valued? The children believe it should be valued at the date of their mother's death. Mr X, on the other hand, argues that the valuation must be made at the time of the actual conversion, several years later. In the meantime, he has aged, his life expectancy has decreased, and therefore the value of his usufruct is higher (because the usufruct lasts for a shorter time, it is worth more in capital).

The court of appeal (second instance court) rules in favour of the children: it values the usufruct according to Mr X's age at the date of death, using the mortality table of insurance companies. Mr X appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation quashes the judgment of the court of appeal. It holds that the conversion aims to substitute a capital sum for a pre-existing usufruct: the conditions for its realisation must therefore be determined at the date closest to the implementation of the conversion. In short, the valuation must be made at the date on which the conversion takes effect, not at the date of death.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation bases its decision on Article 1134 of the Civil Code (now Article 1103), which provides that agreements lawfully entered into have the force of law for those who have made them. In other words, the marriage contract provides for a conversion of the usufruct into capital: the intention of the parties, which is that the capital replaces the usufruct for the future, must be respected.

The lower courts had used the fiscal table for usufruct, which sets a value according to the age of the usufructuary at the date of death. But the Court of Cassation considers that this table is not suitable for conversion, because it is designed to value the usufruct at the time of the liquidation of the estate (i.e., at the time of death). The conversion, on the other hand, is a subsequent act that replaces a life interest with immediate capital. The value of the usufruct must therefore reflect the economic reality at the time the capital is paid.

In practice, this means that if the surviving spouse is aged 70 at the date of death but 75 at the date of conversion, his life expectancy has decreased: the usufruct is worth more (because it is deemed to last for a shorter time, the capital to be paid is higher). The Court of Cassation refers the case to another court of appeal for a new valuation according to this principle.

This decision is a confirmation of previous case law (notably Cass. civ. 1re, 20 March 1979) and is not a reversal. It simply reminds that the reference date for the valuation must be the date closest to the realisation of the conversion.

What this means for you — concretely

If you are a surviving spouse in Évron, and you are negotiating the conversion of your usufruct with the heirs, you must insist that the valuation be made at the date of conversion, not at the date of death. In Mayenne, a usufructuary aged 80 at the date of conversion will obtain a higher capital than if he had been valued at the date of death at age 75. For example, for a property worth €200,000, the difference can reach €10,000 to €15,000 depending on age.

For heirs, beware: if you pay a capital based on age at death, you may have to pay a supplement if the surviving spouse takes legal action against you. It is better to negotiate from the outset on the basis of the date of conversion.

For professionals (notaries, lawyers, estate agents), this case law requires you to be vigilant when drafting conversion deeds. The date of valuation must be expressly mentioned and justified by an updated life interest table (such as the INSEE table or that of insurance companies).

Finally, if you are a purchaser of property burdened with a usufruct, note that the value of the usufruct may vary according to the date of conversion. If you purchase the bare ownership (ownership without the usufruct), the usufructuary may request to convert his right at a time that maximises its value.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Specify in the marriage contract or gift the date of valuation of the usufruct in case of conversion. A clear clause avoids any subsequent challenge.
  • Use a notary or a specialised lawyer to draft the conversion deed. A professional knows the tables and applicable case law.
  • Negotiate the conversion as soon as possible after death. The longer you wait, the older the usufructuary becomes, and the higher the capital value (for him) or lower (for the heirs).
  • In case of disagreement, apply to the interim relief judge for an expert assessment. An accountant or actuary can calculate the value of the usufruct at the date closest to the conversion.

Further details: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. Already in a judgment of 20 March 1979 (No. 77-14.567), the Court had held that the value of the usufruct must be assessed at the date of conversion. More recently, in a judgment of 14 January 2015 (No. 13-25.843), it reminded that the fiscal table is only an indicator, and that judges may use other valuation methods, such as the life interest table.

The trend is therefore towards flexibility: courts favour a real economic valuation rather than an automatic application of a table. This means that in future, disputes will focus less on the date and more on the calculation method (discount rate, life expectancy, etc.). Professionals must therefore master these techniques to best defend their clients' interests.

Key points to remember

FAQ

  • What date should be used to value the usufruct in case of conversion? The date closest to the actual conversion, not the date of death.
  • Can I challenge a conversion already carried out based on age at death? Yes, if the deed is not final (no settlement or irrevocable judgment). You must act within 5 years (general limitation period).
  • Which table should be used? The INSEE table or that of insurance companies, updated to the date of conversion. The fiscal table (Article 669 CGI) is not suitable.
  • What if the heirs refuse to revalue? Apply to the judicial court to have the value fixed by an expert.
  • Does this rule also apply in case of sale of the usufruct? Yes, the same logic applies: the value of the usufruct sold must be valued at the date of sale.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quelle est la date à retenir pour évaluer l'usufruit en cas de conversion ?

La date la plus proche de la conversion effective, pas celle du décès, selon la Cour de cassation (arrêt du 10 mai 1989).

Puis-je contester une conversion déjà réalisée sur la base de l'âge au décès ?

Oui, si l'acte n'est pas définitif. Il faut agir dans les 5 ans (délai de prescription de droit commun).

Quel barème utiliser pour évaluer l'usufruit ?

Le barème de l'Insee ou des compagnies d'assurances actualisé à la date de conversion. Le barème fiscal (article 669 CGI) n'est pas adapté.

Que faire si les héritiers refusent de réévaluer ?

Saisir le tribunal judiciaire pour faire fixer la valeur par un expert.

Cette règle s'applique-t-elle aussi en cas de vente de l'usufruit ?

Oui, la même logique s'applique : la valeur de l'usufruit cédé doit être évaluée au jour de la cession.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 86-17.766
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 10 mai 1989

Mots-clés

usufruitconjoint survivantconversion en capitalsuccessionévaluation usufruit

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Surviving spouse in Mayenne: valuation of usufruct

Mrs Dupont, aged 78, loses her husband in Mayenne. The children want to convert her usufruct into capital using her age at death (75).

Application pratique:

Mrs Dupont must insist on a valuation at the date of conversion, i.e., age 78. On a property worth €250,000, she will gain about €8,000 more. She should contact a lawyer to negotiate or apply to the court.

2

Heirs in Évron: risk of undervaluation

The children of a deceased person in Évron offer their stepmother aged 80 a conversion based on age at death (75).

Application pratique:

They risk having to pay a supplement if the stepmother challenges. It is better to accept a valuation at age 80 from the outset to avoid litigation. Consult a notary to fix the value.

3

Property professional: drafting a conversion deed

A notary in Laval must draft a conversion deed for a complex succession.

Application pratique:

He must specify the date of valuation (date of the deed) and use an updated life interest table. If in doubt, call on an accountant. This secures the deed and avoids challenges.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide