Aller au contenu principal
Sale by Lots of More Than 10 Dwellings: Nullity of Notices for Formal Defect
Droit-immobilier

Sale by Lots of More Than 10 Dwellings: Nullity of Notices for Formal Defect

📅 Décision du 24 June 2009⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation annuls notices to sell served by the City of Paris because the mandatory formalities of the collective agreement of 9 June 1998 had not been observed, even though the decision to sell predated the agreement.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 08-14.731 • 2009-06-24 • See the decision →

Imagine: you are a tenant in Cuincy, an apartment you have occupied for ten years. One day, your landlord tells you he is selling the building by lots and gives you notice to quit. You wonder if this is legal. And what if the landlord had not complied with all the mandatory formalities? The question is crucial: can a simple procedural error invalidate the entire notice?

The Court of Cassation answered in the affirmative in this judgment of 24 June 2009. It reminds us that certain formalities are of public policy (i.e., they cannot be disregarded by the parties) and must be completed before the service of notices to sell, even if the decision to sell was taken before the entry into force of the collective agreement that imposes them.

Specifically, a landlord who sells more than ten lots in the same building must comply with preliminary obligations (information to tenants, consultation, etc.). If he does not do so, the notices are void. Analysis of this decision that protects tenants but also imposes increased vigilance on landlords.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

The City of Paris, owner of a building located at 12 rue des Nonnains-d'Hydres, decides to sell the entire building by lots, which contains more than ten dwellings. In 2005, it serves notices to sell to several tenants, including Mrs. X. These notices are served in the context of a sale by lots, falling within the scope of the collective agreement of 9 June 1998, made mandatory by decree of 22 July 1999.

Mrs. X contests the validity of the notices. She argues that the City of Paris did not comply with the mandatory formalities provided for by this agreement, notably the prior information of tenants and consultation of tenants' representatives. The City argues that the decision to sell was taken before the agreement came into force, so these formalities would not apply to it.

The dispute goes up to the Paris Court of Appeal, which rules in favour of the tenant: the notices are annulled. The City appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation dismisses the appeal and confirms the nullity. Mrs. X's story, who could have lost her home, ends well thanks to judicial rigour.

The Reasoning of the Court — Explained

The Court of Cassation relies on the collective agreement of 9 June 1998, made mandatory by Decree No. 99-628 of 22 July 1999. This agreement requires landlords who sell more than ten dwellings in the same building to comply with preliminary formalities before serving notices: information to tenants about the sale project, consultation of the tenants' council or tenants' representatives, etc. These formalities are described as public policy (they are binding on everyone, even if the landlord and tenant decide otherwise).

The City of Paris claimed that since the decision to sell predated the entry into force of the agreement, the formalities did not apply. The Court rejects this argument. It distinguishes between the decision to sell (which may be earlier) and the sale by lots operation (which is materialised by the notices). The formalities apply to operations in progress when the agreement comes into force, i.e., sales that were not yet completed. Since the notices were served after the agreement came into force, the formalities had to be observed.

The Court also recalls that the nullity of the notices arises as soon as the formalities have not been observed, regardless of whether the sale was decided earlier. This is a protective solution for tenants, which prevents mass sales from taking place behind their backs without prior information.

What This Means for You — Practically

For tenants: if you receive a notice to sell in the context of a sale by lots of more than ten dwellings, check that your landlord has complied with the preliminary formalities. For example, in Denain, a building of 15 dwellings put up for sale: the landlord must inform you in writing of the project, consult you, and respect a deadline. If he has not done so, the notice can be annulled, and you can stay in the premises. Do not hesitate to consult a lawyer to verify the regularity.

For landlord-proprietors: if you are selling more than ten lots in the same building, even if your decision to sell dates from before 1999, you must comply with the formalities of the agreement. Non-compliance leads to the nullity of the notices, which delays the sale and can be costly. For example, a landlord in Cuincy who started a sale by lots in 2008 without informing the tenants had to restart the entire procedure, losing six months and legal fees.

For purchasers: if you are buying a building by lots, ensure that the notices served to the tenants are valid. An annulled notice can block the sale or expose you to a claim. Demand a certificate from the seller regarding compliance with the formalities.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Before serving a notice to sell, check the number of lots sold in the building: if you are selling more than ten lots, the collective agreement applies. Consult Decree No. 99-628 of 22 July 1999 for the exact formalities.
  • Inform tenants in writing at least six months before serving the notice: specify the sale by lots project, the number of lots, and the terms. Keep proof of receipt (registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt).
  • Consult the tenants' council or tenants' representatives: meet with them and gather their opinion. Even if the opinion is not binding, its absence can lead to nullity.
  • Engage a lawyer specialised in property law: a professional will check the compliance of your procedure. The cost of a consultation (£45) is trivial compared to the costs of litigation.

This decision is part of a line of cases protecting tenants. The Court of Cassation had already held, in a judgment of 17 January 2008 (No. 06-21.123), that the formalities of the agreement applied to ongoing sales, thus confirming a broad interpretation. Conversely, some lower courts had previously held that the agreement applied only to sales started after its entry into force. The Court of Cassation puts an end to this divergence.

Since 2009, the trend has been towards strengthening tenants' rights in the face of sales by lots. The Alur law (2014) even extended these obligations to certain buildings with fewer than ten lots. Landlords must therefore be vigilant: a simple omission can be costly. In the future, we can expect courts to continue severely sanctioning failures to comply with mandatory formalities.

Checklist Before Acting

  • Have I checked if the sale concerns more than ten lots? Yes / No → If yes, the agreement applies.
  • Have I informed the tenants in writing of the sale by lots project? Yes / No → If no, do not serve a notice before doing so.
  • Have I consulted the tenants' representatives (tenants' council or other)? Yes / No → If no, organise a meeting.
  • Were the notices served after the completion of these formalities? Yes / No → If no, the notices are void.
  • Have I kept evidence (letters, minutes)? Yes / No → Keep them in case of a challenge.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (£45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que l'accord collectif du 9 juin 1998 ?

C'est un accord entre bailleurs et locataires, rendu obligatoire par décret, qui impose des formalités préalables (information, consultation) avant la vente par lots de plus de dix logements d'un même immeuble.

Puis-je contester un congé pour vendre si mon propriétaire n'a pas respecté ces formalités ?

Oui, vous pouvez demander la nullité du congé devant le tribunal judiciaire. Le délai est généralement de deux mois après la réception du congé.

Combien coûte une procédure pour contester un congé ?

Les frais d'avocat varient, mais une première consultation est à 45 €. En cas de procédure, comptez entre 1 500 € et 3 000 €, selon la complexité.

Que faire si je suis propriétaire et que j'ai déjà délivré des congés sans respecter les formalités ?

Il est urgent de consulter un avocat. Vous pourriez être contraint de retirer les congés et de recommencer la procédure, ce qui retarde la vente.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle si mon immeuble a moins de dix logements ?

Non, l'accord du 9 juin 1998 ne concerne que les immeubles de plus de dix logements. Pour les immeubles plus petits, d'autres règles s'appliquent (loi Alur, etc.).

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 08-14.731
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 24 juin 2009

Mots-clés

vente par lotscongé pour vendreformalités d'ordre publicaccord collectif 1998nullité des congés

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Tenant in Cuincy: notice annulled for lack of information

Mr. Dupont, a tenant in Cuincy, receives a notice to sell. The building has 12 lots. The landlord did not inform him of the sale by lots project. Mr. Dupont challenges it.

Application pratique:

Mr. Dupont can seek nullity of the notice based on this judgment. He must act quickly (2 months). He will likely succeed because the lack of information is a public policy formality.

2

Landlord in Denain: sale by lots blocked

Mrs. Martin, a landlord in Denain, sells a building of 15 lots. She serves notices without consulting the tenants' council. The tenants challenge it.

Application pratique:

Mrs. Martin risks annulment of the notices. She will have to restart the procedure, losing 6 to 12 months. She should have consulted a lawyer before serving the notices.

3

Purchaser of a building by lots: check the notices

Mr. Legrand buys a building of 20 lots in Cuincy. The seller provides him with the notices, but they were not preceded by the formalities. A tenant challenges.

Application pratique:

Mr. Legrand can claim against the seller for latent defect or failure to deliver conforming goods. He should demand a warranty in the sale deed.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide