Aller au contenu principal
Latent Defects: Time Limit to Bring Claim is 2 Years from Discovery, but 20-Year Longstop Applies
Droit-immobilier

Latent Defects: Time Limit to Bring Claim is 2 Years from Discovery, but 20-Year Longstop Applies

📅 Décision du 21 July 2023⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 9 vues📖 8 min de lecture

A claim for latent defects must be brought within two years of discovering the defect, and cannot exceed twenty years from the date of sale. The French Supreme Court clarifies the rules for old sales and recourse claims.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 20-10.763 • 2023-07-21

You have just bought a villa in Vallauris, with a breathtaking view of the Mediterranean. Everything seemed perfect, until a persistent smell of dampness invaded the basement after the first rains. The technical survey revealed nothing, but the walls are oozing. You then discover a latent defect: an old infiltration that the seller had concealed. You are furious, but above all, you wonder: do I still have time to take legal action?

This question is asked by hundreds of property owners every year. Because the law sets very precise time limits for bringing a claim for latent defects (serious defects that render the property unfit for use or diminish its use so much that the buyer would not have bought it, or would have paid less, had they known). The decision of the French Supreme Court of 21 July 2023 (No. 20-10.763) serves as a reminder of these rules, with an important clarification regarding the twenty-year longstop.

In short, this decision confirms that you have two years from the discovery of the defect to bring a claim, but this period can never exceed twenty years from the sale. A detail that can change everything, especially in old cases. Analysis.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Imagine a property developer from Nice, the company Riviera Construction, which buys a plot of land in Vallauris in 1998 to build a block of flats. It sells the units to buyers between 2000 and 2002. In 2006, cracks appear on the facade of one of the buildings. The co-owners alert the management company, but nothing is done. In 2010, a court-ordered expert report is obtained: the defect was latent, it is a foundation defect. The co-owners then sue the developer in 2012, more than ten years after the sales.

The developer, in turn, brings a recourse claim against its own seller (the landowner) and its insurer. The question that arises is this: is the co-owners' claim for latent defects against the developer still admissible, given that more than ten years have passed since the purchase? And what about the developer's claim against its seller?

The lower courts (Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence) had declared the co-owners' claim inadmissible, considering that the ten-year limitation period (applicable before the 2008 reform) had expired. The French Supreme Court quashes this judgment. It recalls that, since the Law of 17 June 2008, a claim for latent defects is subject to a limitation period of two years from the discovery of the defect, with a twenty-year longstop from the date of sale. And for sales prior to 2008, this new period applies if the old ten-year period had not expired by 19 June 2008. In other words, the co-owners had until 2022 to bring a claim, since they discovered the defect in 2010. The case is remitted to another court of appeal.

The Court's Reasoning — Analysed

The French Supreme Court relies on two fundamental provisions: Article 1648, paragraph 1 of the Civil Code (which sets the two-year period from the discovery of the defect for bringing a claim for latent defects) and Article 2232 of the same Code (which establishes a twenty-year longstop from the date the right arises, after which no claim can be brought).

But what exactly does this change? Before the 2008 reform, a claim for latent defects was subject to a ten-year limitation period from the sale. The Law of 17 June 2008 reduced this period to two years, but added a twenty-year longstop. For sales concluded before the entry into force of this law (19 June 2008), the new regime applies if the old ten-year period had not yet expired on that date. And account must be taken of the time already elapsed since the sale.

However, be careful: the twenty-year longstop is a limitation period (a maximum period), which does not run from the discovery of the defect, but from the sale. Thus, even if you discover a defect after 19 years, you have two years to bring a claim, but you cannot exceed the twentieth year. For example, if the sale took place on 1 January 2000 and you discover the defect on 1 January 2019, you have until 1 January 2022 to bring a claim (two years after discovery), but in reality, the longstop expires on 1 January 2020 (twenty years after the sale). So you actually only have one year to bring a claim.

What few people know is that this longstop also applies to recourse claims (when the initial seller sues its own seller). In our case, the developer wanted to bring a claim against its seller. The Court specifies that for a recourse claim, the two-year period runs from the date of the claim (summons), but the twenty-year longstop always runs from the date of the sale concluded by the party against whom recourse is sought. In other words, the developer cannot sue its seller if more than twenty years have elapsed since the sale of the land.

What This Means for You — Practically

If you are a buyer of real property (house, flat, commercial premises) and you discover a latent defect, you must bring a claim within two years of that discovery, but never beyond twenty years after the sale. Concretely, if you buy a flat in Nice in 2023 and discover a termite infestation in 2025, you have until 2027 to sue the seller. But if you discover the defect in 2042 (19 years after the sale), you only have until 2043 (20 years after the sale) to bring a claim, i.e. only one year.

For landlord owners, be careful: if you sell a property and the buyer discovers a defect, they can sue you within two years of discovery, even if the sale is old (within the 20-year limit). undefined, I have encountered cases where a seller in good faith had to reimburse thousands of euros for cracks appearing 15 years after the sale, because the buyer only discovered the defect at that time.

As for real estate professionals (developers, builders), know that you can be sued by your buyers long after the sale, but you can also bring a recourse claim against your own sellers within two years of the claim (summons), always within the twenty-year limit from your own purchase. Example with figures: a developer buys a plot of land in Vallauris in 2010, builds and sells the units in 2012. In 2020, defects are discovered by the co-owners, who sue him in 2021. The developer can then sue his seller until 2023 (two years after the claim), but not beyond 2030 (twenty years after his purchase).

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Arrange for full technical surveys before buying. Do not rely solely on mandatory surveys (asbestos, lead, termites...). For a villa in Vallauris, for example, a damp survey and a search for structural cracks can reveal potential defects. This will allow you either to renegotiate the price or to withdraw from the purchase.
  • Keep all documents relating to the sale and surveys. If a defect is discovered later, you will need to prove that the defect existed before the sale and that it was latent. Invoices for previous works, quotes, correspondence with the seller are all evidence.
  • Act quickly as soon as a problem is discovered. Do not delay in having the defect assessed by an expert (expert report or court-ordered). The two-year period runs from discovery, but if you wait, you risk losing the benefit of the claim. Send a recorded delivery letter to the seller to inform them and attempt an amicable solution, but without losing sight of the longstop.
  • For sellers, provide for clauses limiting the warranty in time. Although the latent defects warranty is a matter of public policy (it cannot be waived in advance), you can include a clause limiting the duration of your liability to a certain number of years (e.g., 5 years). This clause is valid if it is clear and not abusive. This protects you against late claims.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This decision is part of a consistent line of French Supreme Court rulings. Already, in a judgment of 3 November 2016 (No. 15-25.447), the Court had specified that the twenty-year longstop applies to claims for latent defects, and that it runs from the sale. The 2023 judgment confirms this solution, extending it to recourse claims and settling transitional issues for sales prior to 2008.

Another important decision is that of 13 September 2017 (No. 16-20.874), which held that the starting point of the two-year period is the date on which the buyer had certain knowledge of the defect, not mere suspicion. The courts are therefore strict on the evidence of discovery.

The tendency of the courts is to protect the buyer by allowing a reasonable time to act after discovery, while setting an absolute limit to prevent claims that are too late. This means that in the future, disputes will focus mainly on the date of discovery of the defect and on the calculation of the longstop in transitional situations. It is therefore essential to document the chronology of events well.

What You Must Absolutely Remember

Here is a 5-point checklist to know if you can bring a claim:

  1. When was the defect discovered? The date of discovery triggers the two-year period.
  2. When did the sale take place? The twenty-year longstop runs from the sale.
  3. If the sale is before 19 June 2008, check whether the old ten-year period had expired by that date. If so, you are out of time. If not, the new two-year period applies, but taking into account the time already elapsed since the sale.
  4. Do you have evidence? Gather surveys, photos, witness statements, expert reports.
  5. Who is the seller? If it is a professional, the warranty is easier to enforce. If it is a private individual, they may rely on good faith.

In summary, as soon as you suspect a latent defect, do not wait: consult a solicitor specialising in property law to assess your chances and act within the time limits.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

Questions fréquentes

Quel est le délai pour agir en garantie des vices cachés après la découverte du vice ?

Vous disposez de deux ans à compter de la découverte du vice pour intenter une action en justice, mais jamais au-delà de vingt ans après la vente. Par exemple, si vous découvrez le vice en 2023, vous avez jusqu'en 2025, mais si la vente date de 2005, le délai butoir expire en 2025 également.

Puis-je agir contre le vendeur si la vente a eu lieu il y a plus de 10 ans ?

Oui, si vous avez découvert le vice après la vente et que moins de 20 ans se sont écoulés depuis la vente. Par exemple, une vente en 2005, vice découvert en 2020 : vous pouvez agir jusqu'en 2025 (2 ans après découverte) mais pas au-delà de 2025 (20 ans après vente).

Que faire si je suis vendeur et que l'acheteur découvre un vice 15 ans après la vente ?

Vous pouvez être poursuivi si l'acheteur agit dans les 2 ans de sa découverte et dans les 20 ans suivant la vente. Pour vous protéger, conservez vos diagnostics et factures de travaux. Vous pouvez aussi limiter votre garantie dans l'acte de vente (clause de durée, mais pas d'exclusion totale).

Quels sont les vices cachés les plus fréquents en immobilier ?

Les infiltrations d'eau, les fissures structurelles, les défauts d'isolation, la présence de termites non détectée, les problèmes de fondations, ou encore les vices affectant les installations électriques ou de plomberie.

Un diagnostic technique qui ne révèle rien me protège-t-il contre un vice caché ?

Non, car le vendeur reste tenu de la garantie des vices cachés même si un diagnostic n'a rien révélé, à condition que le vice soit grave et antérieur à la vente. Le diagnostic n'est qu'un élément de preuve.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 20-10.763
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 21 juillet 2023

Mots-clés

vices cachésgarantie des vices cachésprescriptiondélai butoirimmobilierVallaurisNice

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Buyer of a villa in Vallauris discovering infiltrations

You bought a villa in Vallauris in 2018. In 2023, after heavy rains, you notice infiltrations in the basement. The expert report reveals a waterproofing defect that existed before the sale.

Application pratique:

You have until 2025 to sue the seller (2 years after discovery in 2023), and at the latest until 2038 (20 years after the sale in 2018). Gather evidence (expert report, photos) and consult a solicitor without delay.

2

Property developer in Nice sued 12 years after sale

A developer sold units in 2010. In 2022, cracks appear. The co-owners sue him in 2023. The developer wants to bring a recourse claim against his land seller (purchase in 2008).

Application pratique:

The co-owners' claim is admissible if the defect was discovered in 2022 (2-year period until 2024, and 20-year longstop until 2030). The developer's recourse claim against his seller is possible until 2025 (2 years after the claim), but the 20-year longstop runs from 2008, i.e. until 2028. He must act quickly.

3

Landlord owner in Nice selling a property with a latent defect

You sell a property in Nice in 2015. In 2025, the buyer discovers a construction defect (soundproofing defect). He sues you in 2026.

Application pratique:

You may be held liable if the defect was latent and existed before the sale. You can bring a recourse claim against your own seller or the builder, within 2 years of the claim and within 20 years of your purchase. Check your professional insurance.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide