Aller au contenu principal
In an unregistered partnership,
Droit Immobilier

In an unregistered partnership,

📅 Decision of 15 July 1987🔄 Updated on 12 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 24 views📖 2 min read

In an unregistered partnership, each partner contracts in his own name and is alone bound towards third parties; however, it is different if the participants act in the capacity of partner openly and to the knowledge of third parties, or if a partner, by his interference, led the other contracting party to believe that he intended to be bound towards him. The partners of such a partnership cannot therefore be held jointly and severally liable to repay a loan taken out by one of them with a bank, and after the latter had communicated the partnership agreement to the bank, without the personal acts of the participants being established enabling it to be considered that they had acted in the capacity of partners openly and to the knowledge of the bank, or that they had interfered in the agreement entered into by the borrowing partner with the bank, leading the bank to believe that they intended to be bound towards it.

Reference decision: cc • No. 86-10.787 • 1987-07-15 • View decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

In an unregistered partnership, each partner contracts in his own name and is alone bound towards third parties; however, it is different if the participants act in the capacity of partner openly and to the knowledge of third parties, or if a partner, by his interference, led the other contracting party to believe that he intended to be bound towards him. The partners of such a partnership cannot therefore be held jointly and severally liable to repay a loan taken out by one of them with a bank, and after the latter had communicated the partnership agreement to the bank, without the personal acts of the participants being established enabling it to be considered that they had acted in the capacity of partners openly and to the knowledge of the bank, or that they had interfered in the agreement entered into by the borrowing partner with the bank, leading the bank to believe that they intended to be bound towards it.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 86-10.787
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 15 July 1987

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide