Aller au contenu principal
Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014,
Droit Immobilier

Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014,

📅 Decision of 16 November 2023🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 views📖 2 min read

Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014, which, in that it amended Article L. 145-15 of the Commercial Code, replaced the nullity of clauses having the effect of defeating the right to renewal with their being deemed unwritten, is applicable to current leases and the action seeking to have a clause of the lease deemed unwritten is not subject to any limitation period. Thus, the action seeking to have a clause having the effect of defeating the right to renewal deemed unwritten, brought after the entry into force of the Law of 18 June 2014 and relating to a lease in progress at that date, is admissible even though the limitation period for the action for nullity of that same clause would have expired on the date of entry into force of the new law.

Reference decision: cc • N° 22-14.091 • 2023-11-16 • View the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Law No. 2014-626 of 18 June 2014, which, in that it amended Article L. 145-15 of the Commercial Code, replaced the nullity of clauses having the effect of defeating the right to renewal with their being deemed unwritten, is applicable to current leases and the action seeking to have a clause of the lease deemed unwritten is not subject to any limitation period. Thus, the action seeking to have a clause having the effect of defeating the right to renewal deemed unwritten, brought after the entry into force of the Law of 18 June 2014 and relating to a lease in progress at that date, is admissible even though the limitation period for the action for nullity of that same clause would have expired on the date of entry into force of the new law.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 22-14.091
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 16 November 2023

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide