Characterised the interference of an individual

Application pratique:

This case law confirms that the manager's actions constitute interference in the owner's affairs. The landlord should immediately request proof of authorisation, formally reject the agreement in writing, and refuse payment. If necessary, they can seek a court order to declare the arrangement void and recover any sums already paid.

Application pratique:

The case law shows that the agent had no authority to bind the sellers. The buyer should have demanded a valid power of attorney before relying on the statement. Now, they can challenge the misrepresentation, using the decision to argue that the promise was unauthorised and seek compensation for the higher charges through negotiation or litigation.

Application pratique:

Under this case law, the acting co-owner's interference is unauthorised and unenforceable. The other co-owners should jointly reject the bill, call an emergency general meeting to ratify or reject the decision, and if necessary, take legal action to have the contract declared null and void against them. They must keep all documentation to prove lack of consent.