Aller au contenu principal
Having noted that the guarantors of
Droit Immobilier

Having noted that the guarantors of

📅 Décision du 06 February 2014⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Having noted that the insured's guarantors were seeking to establish the insurer's tort liability under Article 1382 of the Civil Code by alleging a wrongful non-performance of the contract causing their own loss, a Court of Appeal correctly deduces that this action brought by third parties to the insurance contract is not subject to the two-year limitation period of Article L. 114-1 of the Insurance Code.

Reference decision: cc • N° 13-10.540 • 2014-02-06 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Having noted that the insured's guarantors were seeking to establish the insurer's tort liability under Article 1382 of the Civil Code by alleging a wrongful non-performance of the contract causing their own loss, a Court of Appeal correctly deduces that this action brought by third parties to the insurance contract is not subject to the two-year limitation period of Article L. 114-1 of the Insurance Code

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly adhere to the statutory time limits for legal action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: a 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 13-10.540
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 06 février 2014

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord sues insurer for tenant’s unrepaired damage

You let a property in Lille. Your tenant’s insurance policy covers damage to the building, but after a leak in January 2022, the insurer unreasonably refuses to pay the €8,000 repair bill, leaving you out of pocket. The tenant did not challenge the refusal.

Application pratique:

As a third party to the insurance contract, your claim against the insurer is in tort (delict), not under the insurance contract. The case law confirms you are not restricted by the two-year insurance limitation period (Insurance Code, Art. L. 114-1). Instead, you benefit from the standard five-year tort limitation (Civil Code, Art. 2224) from when you discovered the loss. You should gather evidence of the wrongful refusal and your financial loss, then consider legal action for damages within that five-year window.

2

First-time buyer discovers defective heating system after purchase

You buy a flat in Bordeaux, completing in March 2021. The seller’s home insurance covered appliance breakdown, but the insurer rejected a valid claim for the broken boiler in November 2020. The seller did not pursue it. You spend €3,500 on a replacement in April 2021.

Application pratique:

Even though you were not a party to the insurance contract, you can sue the insurer in tort for wrongful non-performance that caused your loss. The Cour de cassation decision means this tort claim is not subject to the short two-year insurance limitation period. You have five years from the date you knew of the damage (the boiler failure and insurer’s refusal) to bring a claim. Keep all receipts and correspondence, and instruct a French avocat to send a formal mise en demeure (letter of claim) to the insurer.

3

Co-owner seeks compensation from building’s insurer for water ingress

In your Lyon condominium, a blocked drain in December 2023 caused flooding in your ground-floor flat, ruining parquet flooring worth €5,000. The syndicate’s building insurance inexplicably denied liability, and the syndicate decided not to appeal. You face the repair cost alone.

Application pratique:

As an individual co-owner, you are a third party to the syndicate’s insurance contract. The insurer’s refusal may give you a tort claim for the loss suffered. Under the clarifications in the 2014 decision, this action is governed by the five-year tort limitation period, not the two-year insurance deadline. You are not bound by the syndicate’s inaction. Document the damage immediately, obtain quotes, and seek independent legal advice to pursue the insurer directly for damages.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide