Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

The Court of Appeal rightly held

📅 Décision du 22 June 1977⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The Court of Appeal rightly held that the owners of a landlocked property could not claim possessory protection for a right of way over the path crossing their neighbour's land, since it found that these owners used sometimes that path, sometimes a footpath crossing another neighbouring property, sometimes a third route, and therefore did not establish, during the year preceding the disturbance, unequivocal possession of the site of the claimed right of way.

Reference decision: cc • N° 75-13.600 • 1977-06-22 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The facts

The Court of Appeal rightly held that the owners of a landlocked property could not claim possessory protection for a right of way over the path crossing their neighbour's land, since it found that these owners used sometimes that path, sometimes a footpath crossing another neighbouring property, sometimes a third route, and therefore did not establish, during the year preceding the disturbance, unequivocal possession of the site of the claimed right of way.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for legal remedies.
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence).
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 75-13.600
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 juin 1977

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Foncier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit foncier

Tous les articles Foncier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide