Droit Immobilier

The order must be quashed

📅 Décision du 29 June 1976⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 1 min de lecture

The expropriation order made on the basis of individual notifications subsequent to the opening of the parcel inquiry must be quashed.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 75-70.443 • 1976-06-29 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The expropriation order made on the basis of individual notifications subsequent to the opening of the parcel inquiry must be quashed.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for lodging appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 75-70.443
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 29 juin 1976

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord challenges late expropriation notification in Bordeaux

A landlord in Bordeaux owns a flat worth €220,000, rented for €800 per month. The city is extending a tramway and opens a parcel inquiry on 5 January 2024. The landlord receives an individual notification of expropriation only on 20 January 2024, after the inquiry has already begun.

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation decision (No. 75-70.443, 29 June 1976) holds that an expropriation order based on individual notifications sent after the opening of the parcel inquiry must be quashed. Check the exact dates of the inquiry opening and your notification, keep all correspondence, and file an appeal before the administrative court within two months of the notification date to challenge the expropriation order. Consult a French real estate lawyer to prepare the challenge and protect your rental income.

2

First-time buyer discovers latent expropriation in Marseille

A first-time buyer purchased a house in Marseille in June 2023 for €280,000. In 2024, the local council plans to build a school and opens a parcel inquiry on 1 March 2024. The individual notification was sent to the previous owner and only forwarded to the buyer on 10 April 2024, after the inquiry opened.

Application pratique:

Under this case law, an expropriation order based on individual notifications given after the parcel inquiry has opened is invalid. The buyer should immediately gather the purchase deed, proof of registration, and the forwarded notification envelope showing the late date. They can challenge the expropriation order within two months of receiving the notification by filing an appeal before the administrative court, arguing that proper notification was not given at the correct time. Seek legal advice to ensure the challenge is filed correctly.

3

Co-owners fight collective expropriation of courtyard in Nice

In a residential building in Nice, the city expropriates part of the common courtyard for a public car park. The parcel inquiry opens on 10 September 2024, but individual notifications to each co-owner are sent on 25 September 2024. One co-owner, holding a 15% share, receives the late notification.

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation decision establishes that an expropriation order made on the basis of individual notifications subsequent to the opening of the parcel inquiry must be quashed. The co-owner should check the syndic's records to confirm the inquiry opening date and their notification date, keep the envelope as evidence, and file an appeal within two months of receiving the notification. Acting collectively with other co-owners strengthens the challenge, and a French property lawyer can help coordinate the appeal before the administrative court.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide