Aller au contenu principal
A legally justified decision which
Droit Immobilier

A legally justified decision which

📅 Décision du 15 January 1997⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 24 vues📖 2 min de lecture

A decision is legally justified which, to reject a claim for compensation for damage caused by hares to an apple orchard, holds that a plantation of field-grown fruit trees, however extensive, constitutes an orchard, and that under the law applicable in Alsace-Lorraine, damage to orchards does not give rise to compensation where one has neglected to establish protective installations that are usually sufficient to prevent damage, and that in this case the sleeves used did not constitute protective installations sufficient to usually prevent damage.

Reference decision: cc • N° 94-15.434 • 1997-01-15 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A decision is legally justified which, to reject a claim for compensation for damage caused by hares to an apple orchard, holds that a plantation of field-grown fruit trees, however extensive, constitutes an orchard, and that under the law applicable in Alsace-Lorraine, damage to orchards does not give rise to compensation where one has neglected to establish protective installations that are usually sufficient to prevent damage, and that in this case the sleeves used did not constitute protective installations sufficient to usually prevent damage.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 94-15.434
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 15 janvier 1997

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide