Aller au contenu principal
The claim for assessment of an astreinte (penalty for non-compliance)
Droit Immobilier

The claim for assessment of an astreinte (penalty for non-compliance)

📅 Décision du 27 September 2016⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 2 min de lecture

A claim for the assessment of an astreinte (periodic penalty) arising from the non-performance of a court decision ordering a landlord to carry out works in the leased premises is connected to the landlord's claim for rent, so that the tenant is entitled to oppose set-off.

Reference decision: Cass. • No. 15-10.393 • 27 September 2016 • View decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A claim for the assessment of an astreinte (periodic penalty) arising from the non-performance of a court decision ordering a landlord to carry out works in the leased premises is connected to the landlord's claim for rent, so that the tenant is entitled to oppose set-off.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for appeal
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 15-10.393
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 27 septembre 2016

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Commercial tenant offsets astreinte against rent in Bordeaux

A bakery owner in Bordeaux leases a shop with a leaking roof. Despite a court order obtained on 15 March 2024 requiring the landlord to complete repairs by 1 May, the landlord fails to act. The order includes an astreinte (periodic penalty) of €150 per day of delay. By 31 May, 30 days have passed, accruing €4,500 in penalties. The tenant faces lost stock and customer complaints.

Application pratique:

Under the Cour de cassation ruling of 27 September 2016, the tenant's claim for astreinte is connected to the landlord's right to rent, allowing legal set-off. The tenant may deduct the €4,500 from the next quarterly rent payment of €6,000, paying only €1,500. To do this safely, the tenant should send the landlord a formal notice by registered post, enclosing the court order, a calculation of the accrued astreinte, and a statement that the rent is being partially offset. Keep copies of all correspondence to evidence good faith should the landlord challenge the deduction.

2

Residential tenant withholds rent over broken boiler in Lyon

A family renting a flat in Lyon’s 3rd arrondissement endures a broken boiler from January to mid-February 2024. The tribunal d’instance orders the landlord to replace it by 20 February, with an astreinte of €80 per day for non-compliance. The landlord ignores the order, and by 5 March the penalty totals €1,200 (15 days). The tenants' monthly rent is €800, and they wish to offset.

Application pratique:

The 2016 Cour de cassation precedent confirms that an astreinte arising from unperformed works can be set off against rent. The tenants can withhold the full March rent (€800) and apply the remaining €400 against April’s rent. They must provide the landlord with a detailed written statement before the rent due date, referencing the court order, the daily penalty rate, and the exact period of default. To avoid being labelled as non-paying tenants, they should continue to pay the balance of rent once the astreinte is exhausted and maintain proof of all communications.

3

Landlord in Marseille faces rent set-off after ignoring works order

A landlord in Marseille’s Panier district leases a ground-floor commercial unit. After a court orders him to repair a collapsed ceiling by 10 April 2024, with an €200/day astreinte, he delays the work for 25 days, accumulating a €5,000 penalty. The tenant then informs him she is deducting that amount from the upcoming quarterly rent of €7,500.

Application pratique:

This landlord must recognise that the Cour de cassation (27 September 2016) allows tenants to lawfully offset such astreinte claims against rent, provided they are connected to the same lease and the landlord’s default. To limit his loss, he should immediately complete the ordered works to stop further penalty accrual. Legally, he cannot successfully sue for the unpaid rent portion that is covered by the astreinte set-off unless he proves the works order was complied with or the tenant’s calculation is wrong. Moving forward, he should treat court-ordered repair deadlines as strict to avoid similar financial deductions.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide