Aller au contenu principal
The action seeking to have the
Droit Immobilier

The action seeking to have the

📅 Décision du 10 October 2024⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 17 vues📖 1 min de lecture

The action seeking to have a clause of a co-ownership regulation declared unwritten is only admissible if the syndicate of co-owners is joined or heard.

Reference decision: cc • No. 22-22.649 • 2024-10-10 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The action seeking to have a clause of a co-ownership regulation declared unwritten is only admissible if the syndicate of co-owners is joined or heard.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Scrupulously comply with statutory appeal deadlines
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-22.649
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 10 octobre 2024

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Co-owner challenges ban on short-term rentals

Marie, a co-owner in a 20-unit building in Nice, wants to let her flat on Airbnb for holiday lets. The co-ownership rules contain a clause prohibiting any commercial activity, which the syndicate interprets as banning short-term rentals. Marie believes this clause is unenforceable and wants it declared unwritten by the court, estimating her potential rental income at €1,200 per month.

Application pratique:

Before seeking a court order, Marie must ensure the syndicate of co-owners (the legal body representing all owners) is formally involved in the proceedings. This means she must either name the syndicate as a co-defendant or ensure it is heard by the judge. Without this, her claim will be declared inadmissible. Practically, she should send a registered letter to the syndicate (care of the managing agent) outlining her intention and invite them to an amicable discussion, then include them in any legal action as required.

2

Landlord contests commercial use restriction in Lyon

Alain, a professional landlord, owns three flats in a Lyon co-ownership. The règlement de copropriété (co-ownership rules) states that no unit may be used for 'liberal professions', which prevents him from renting to psychologists and architects. Alain wants a court to declare this clause unwritten, as it reduces his rental yield by about €400 per month per flat compared to market rates.

Application pratique:

Alain's court action will be rejected unless the syndicate of co-owners is joined or heard. He must formally involve the syndicate, typically by naming the syndic (the managing agent representing the syndicate) as a party in the proceedings. He should first check the co-ownership's decision-making records and communicate with the syndic to see if the clause can be amended amicably. If litigation is unavoidable, his lawyer must draft the claim so the syndicate is a proper party, otherwise the case will be stopped at the initial stage.

3

First-time buyer fights pet prohibition clause

Camille just purchased her first flat in Bordeaux. After moving in, she discovered a clause in the co-ownership rules stating 'no animals of any kind are permitted', but her dog is a registered emotional support animal. She seeks to have the clause declared unwritten, arguing it is an unreasonable restriction on her right to use her property. The flat cost her €250,000.

Application pratique:

Camille cannot simply ask the court to annul the clause without involving the syndicate of co-owners. She must ensure the syndicate (via its syndic) is either a defendant or at least given the opportunity to present its views to the judge. As a first step, she should contact the syndic to explain her situation and request that the clause be amended before resorting to litigation. If a lawsuit is filed, her claim will only be admissible if the syndicate is properly joined or heard.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide