Aller au contenu principal
The judgment which, by way of interpretation
Droit Immobilier

The judgment which, by way of interpretation

📅 Décision du 26 October 1983⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 16 vues📖 2 min de lecture

The judgment which, by a necessary interpretation, excluding any distortion of the ambiguous terms of a co-ownership regulation that grants the owners of shops the right to connect to the building's collective heating, holds that the option becomes irrevocable once exercised upon completion of the building, rightly decides that a co-owner who has chosen to connect his premises to the heating cannot, by giving up use of that common equipment, be exempted from contributing to the charges it generates.

Reference decision: Cass. • No. 81-16.768 • 26 October 1983 • View decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The judgment which, by a necessary interpretation, excluding any distortion of the ambiguous terms of a co-ownership regulation that grants the owners of shops the right to connect to the building's collective heating, holds that the option becomes irrevocable once exercised upon completion of the building, rightly decides that a co-owner who has chosen to connect his premises to the heating cannot, by giving up use of that common equipment, be exempted from contributing to the charges it generates.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly respect the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 81-16.768
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 26 octobre 1983

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide