Aller au contenu principal
The Builder is, Notwithstanding the Ten-Year Limitation Period, Contractually Liable for Fraudulent Fault
Droit Immobilier

The Builder is, Notwithstanding the Ten-Year Limitation Period, Contractually Liable for Fraudulent Fault

📅 Décision du 12 July 2018⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 18 vues📖 2 min de lecture

The builder is, notwithstanding the ten-year limitation period, contractually liable to the employer for his fraudulent fault where, deliberately, even without an intention to cause harm, he violates his contractual obligations by concealment or fraud. A court of appeal does not characterise such a fault when it holds that the professional committed a gross fault so serious that it must be fraudulent.

Reference decision: cc • No. 17-19.701 • 2018-07-12 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law rights. Here is how it affects you.

The situation

The builder is, notwithstanding the ten-year limitation period, contractually liable to the employer for his fraudulent fault where, deliberately, even without an intention to cause harm, he violates his contractual obligations by concealment or fraud. A court of appeal does not characterise such a fault when it holds that the professional committed a gross fault so serious that it must be fraudulent.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 17-19.701
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 12 juillet 2018

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord uncovers hidden defects after 12 years

A landlord in Bordeaux discovers severe water ingress in a rental flat 12 years after construction. The builder had knowingly used defective waterproofing and concealed it during final inspection. Estimated repair: €45,000.

Application pratique:

This ruling allows you to sue the builder beyond the usual ten-year limit if you can prove deliberate concealment. Gather any evidence showing the builder knew of the defect (e.g. sub-contractor emails, photographs before covering up, or inspection reports). Commission an independent expert to confirm the intentional nature of the fault. Then instruct a solicitor to issue proceedings, citing the 2018 Court of Cassation decision, to recover your repair costs.

2

First-time buyer plagued by falsified soil reports

A first-time buyer in Lyon discovers, 11 years after purchase, that her detached house has sinking foundations. The builder omitted necessary piles and falsified the soil investigation report to hide the omission. Underpinning costs: €70,000.

Application pratique:

Fraudulent concealment extends the builder’s liability indefinitely. You must show the builder intentionally misrepresented the ground conditions. Obtain the original soil report and compare it with a new geotechnical survey to highlight discrepancies. Keep your purchase deed and all correspondence. Contact a property litigation lawyer promptly to bring a claim based on this precise case law, ensuring you act before further deterioration increases costs.

3

Co-owners face costly roof leaks after 13 years

In a Nice condominium completed 13 years earlier, the syndicate discovers persistent roof leaks due to an incorrectly installed membrane. Evidence reveals the builder knew of the fault but covered it up in mandatory progress reports. Repair estimate: €120,000.

Application pratique:

The builder’s fraudulent fault (knowingly hiding a defect) permits legal action outside the ten-year decennial period. The co-owner association should immediately secure all original site reports and any builder correspondence that suggests awareness. Interview residents or workers who may have witnessed the concealment. Then, through your syndic, instruct a lawyer to launch proceedings, relying on the principle that deliberate fraud waives the limitation period, as confirmed in this 2018 ruling.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide