Reference decision: cc • N° 89-12.365 • 1991-04-10 • Consult the decision →
This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here's what it means for you.
The situation
The preliminary contract, binding only the reserving party and the reservation holder and not entailing an obligation of delivery, the Court of Appeal legally justified its decision which, noting that no document required the co-owners or occupants to have carpets in the flats, deduced that the vendor company and the co-owner, sued for compensation for noise disturbance, had not breached their contractual undertaking.
What the law says
This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.
Key points
- Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appealing
- Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
- Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation
For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail |
→ Browse all our legal articles

