Aller au contenu principal
The creditor cannot be deemed to have
Droit Immobilier

The creditor cannot be deemed to have

📅 Décision du 26 May 2009⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 20 vues📖 1 min de lecture

The creditor cannot be deemed to have received payment as long as the sum owed is not made available to him by a transfer to the sub-account of his agent opened at the lawyers' cash settlement fund

Reference decision: cc • N° 08-15.772 • 2009-05-26 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The creditor cannot be deemed to have received payment as long as the sum owed is not made available to him by a transfer to the sub-account of his agent opened at the lawyers' cash settlement fund

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly adhere to statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (deeds, acts, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation for €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 08-15.772
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 26 mai 2009

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord waiting for rent arrears via lawyer escrow

A landlord in Lyon is owed €4,500 in overdue rent. The tenant's lawyer issues a cheque on 1 March and the landlord's lawyer deposits it the same day, but the funds do not appear in the CARPA sub-account until 5 March. The landlord served a formal notice to pay on 3 March, believing the payment was late.

Application pratique:

Under this ruling, payment is not considered made until the sum is actually credited to the recipient lawyer's sub-account at the CARPA (lawyers' cash settlement fund). The landlord should not take enforcement steps (such as issuing a notice to quit or filing a claim) until the account statement proves the funds are available. Always wait for written confirmation of credit before acting, and instruct your lawyer to obtain a dated statement showing the exact credit date.

2

First-time buyer's deposit deadline with notary transfer

A first-time buyer in Bordeaux is purchasing a flat for €200,000. The sale agreement requires a 10% deposit (€20,000) to be paid into the notary's client account on or before 15 June. The buyer initiates the bank transfer at 2 p.m. on 15 June, but the amount is only credited to the notary's sub-account at the lawyers' cash settlement fund on 16 June. The seller attempts to cancel the sale, claiming the deadline was missed.

Application pratique:

According to the case law, payment is effective only when the sum is made available in the sub-account designated for client funds. The buyer's transfer on the due date is insufficient; the credit date governs. To avoid losing the contract, the buyer should always send the deposit several business days before the deadline and obtain unequivocal proof from the notary that the funds are in the appropriate sub-account (CARPA or equivalent) by the deadline. In this situation, if the credit occurred after the deadline, the seller may be entitled to withdraw, so immediate legal advice is essential.

3

Co-owner settlement cheque not cleared in time

In a co-ownership dispute in Marseille, Co-owner A agrees to pay Co-owner B €3,000 via their respective lawyers to settle a claim. Co-owner A hands a personal cheque to his lawyer on 5 April; the lawyer deposits it on 8 April, but the funds are not credited to Co-owner B's lawyer's CARPA sub-account until 12 April. Co-owner B, impatient, sends a default notice on 9 April, alleging breach of the settlement agreement.

Application pratique:

The ruling clarifies that the giving of a cheque is not payment; the debt is only discharged when the sum is irreversibly credited to the receiving party's lawyer's CARPA sub-account. Co-owner A’s lawyer should have used a faster transfer method (e.g., bank wire) to ensure timely credit. Co-owner B’s default notice on 9 April is premature and may be contested. To protect yourself, always confirm the expected credit date with the paying party and verify receipt with a CARPA account statement before alleging default or taking legal action.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide