Aller au contenu principal
Written Submissions Notified to the Adverse Party
Droit Immobilier

Written Submissions Notified to the Adverse Party

📅 Décision du 15 November 2006⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 12 vues📖 2 min de lecture

The written submissions notified to the opposing party prior to referring the matter to the court are a separate act from the initial application for revision of the rent under a revised commercial lease; they have different effects and their notification does not constitute a prior application. Consequently, the Court of Appeal violates Articles 10 and 14, paragraph 1, of Deliberation No. 094 of 8 August 2000 on the revision of rents under leases of buildings or premises for commercial, industrial or artisanal use in New Caledonia, which provisions are identical to those applicable in Metropolitan France, when it declares admissible an action for revision of the rent of a commercial lease despite the absence of a prior application for revision before notification of the written submissions.

Reference decision: cc · No. 05-18.259 · 2006-11-15 · Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification of your real estate law. Here is how it affects you.

The Situation

The written submissions notified to the opposing party prior to referring the matter to the court are a separate act from the initial application for revision of the rent under a revised commercial lease; they have different effects and their notification does not constitute a prior application. Consequently, the Court of Appeal violates Articles 10 and 14, paragraph 1, of Deliberation No. 094 of 8 August 2000 on the revision of rents under leases of buildings or premises for commercial, industrial or artisanal use in New Caledonia, which provisions are identical to those applicable in Metropolitan France, when it declares admissible an action for revision of the rent of a commercial lease despite the absence of a prior application for revision before notification of the written submissions.

What the Law Says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key Points to Remember

  • Scrupulously observe the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 05-18.259
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 15 novembre 2006

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide