Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 05-19.736 • 29 November 2006 • View the decision →
This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.
The situation
As the parties are not required to instruct a lawyer in matters where representation is not mandatory, the erroneous mention in the writ of summons of the instruction of a lawyer not practising within the territorial jurisdiction of the court seised does not constitute a substantial irregularity.
What the law says
This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.
Key points
- Strictly comply with statutory limitation periods for appeals
- Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
- Be proactive: preventive advice is always less costly than litigation
For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail |
→ Browse all our legal articles

