Aller au contenu principal
Neither the stipulation of the regulation of
Droit Immobilier

Neither the stipulation of the regulation of

📅 Décision du 04 January 1989⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 20 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Neither the stipulation in the co-ownership regulations nor a decision of the general meeting of co-owners may impose a restriction on a co-owner's rights over his lot. The decision ruling that the caretaker's lodge, established as a private lot upon the division of the building, must remain designated as the caretaker's dwelling, given that the regulations provide that the charges for this lot will be included in the common charges as long as it is designated for common use and that the general meeting decided to maintain the caretaker's post, must be overturned.

Reference decision: cc • No. 87-14.545 • 1989-01-04 • View the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Neither the stipulation in the co-ownership regulations nor a decision of the general meeting of co-owners may impose a restriction on a co-owner's rights over his lot. The decision ruling that the caretaker's lodge, established as a private lot upon the division of the building, must remain designated as the caretaker's dwelling, given that the regulations provide that the charges for this lot will be included in the common charges as long as it is designated for common use and that the general meeting decided to maintain the caretaker's post, must be overturned.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 87-14.545
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 04 janvier 1989

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide